Posted on February 10 at 10:10 a.m.

To whoever is pretending to be ‘the truth 1001’, but in fact is definitely not reliable.

Whenever a scientist disagrees with Armenian commissars, they are insulted as if they are paid agents of some evil establishment. Armenians on the other hand act as if they have every right to propagandize their self serving agenda and falsifying historical truth. Their last act is creation of an agency called ‘Genocide scholars’. Who decides if their credentials are fit is beyond the world body. Their only specialty seems to accept ‘Armen geno’ hook line and sinker.

There is enough diplomatic eye witnesses plus US archive material to prove the Turks were victims of a world war and not aggressors. IT is not very honest that you are selecting only material suiting your pre determined conclusion.

Where are the Turks who owned 80% of Bulgaria’s land titles? How many Turks are left in Selanik if not Mora, and Crete? At the turn of the century two third of the Balkan population was Muslim. Where are they now? Does anybody have ‘my grandmother told me stories’ of how soldiers who were assigned to accompany them on their way to Anatolia shared their bread ration with those poor women and children during their escape into Turkish Anatolia?

Armenians have plenty of liars and brainwashed Christian brothers to propagate their false stories. They will be humiliated when they examine the truth.

I could very well claim that Prof. Willmar Keiser is in the pocketbook of the Diaspora just like Taner Akcam. One German does not mean 4 million Turks living in Germany or the German government have examined in depth events regarding World War I events of Eastern Anatolia.

Only Armenian propagandists claim without any substance that self defense against Armenian or Greek aggression should be labeled geno-.

On Calling for Consistency

Posted on February 10 at 10:08 a.m.

To Suzy:

I am not surprised at the number of propagandists attacking the persona of those who present logical explanations and ‘accuse’ them of being Turkish. With the same token Armenians should be banned from speaking on the subject as they are very well prejudiced and biased.

I invite you to find ‘millions’ in the accounts of the historians who have concluded that 1915 events cannot be labeled as geno. Armenian propagandists are quick to slander when they are left speechless.

You are insinuating that there are some unopened archive material in Turkish archives. Why do you not mention that ZERO percent of Armenian Dashnak archives located in Boston are opened. The only person, who studied them, a PhD. Student named Yekta was jailed in the Republic of Armenia for buying books that were sold in Armenia.

Since Armenia became a republic in 1990 the population has dropped down by one third in the country. Over 40,000 Armenians escaped into Turkey. Have you wondered why?

As for regards to Kars treaty, Republic of Armenia is the only country who turned back on that agreement. They had signed it 90 years ago, now they are renegotiating. As for their claims on Eastern Anatolia, do not fool yourself. The land you claim is home to 20 million Turks now. Armenian claims are not bringing peace to the region, or to their country.

You are saying that Turkish denial has failed, I doubt that you can materialize your land claims of Western Armenia.

In the light of your insults do not blame me for asking you this, but ‘Who likes Armenia or Armenians?’ Take a look at neighbors of Armenia. Is there any one they respect? What about Armenia’s illegal occupation of Karabagh?

On Calling for Consistency

Posted on February 8 at 9:57 a.m.

My grandmother told me stories are no substitute for the likes of Nuremberg Trials. Turks have their grandmother stories, plus unearthed mass graves to verify those stories.

If they wished to search the truth, Armenians would open the ARF archives just like the Turks opened up the Ottoman Archives.

On Calling for Consistency

Posted on February 8 at 9:52 a.m.

The United Nations excluded warring parties from the definition of ‘genocide’ upon Raphael Lemkin’s recommendation. Armenians were a party in a major world conflict against the Turks. Their leaders boasted in 1918 that 150,000 armed Armenians men volunteered in the Russian Army. 30,000 armed Armenians fought elsewhere.

Armenians were busy wiping out the Moslems living in Eastern Anatolia in an attempt to gain majority in the cities they wished to declare their autonomy at a time when the Ottoman Empire was being attacked by major imperialist powers of the times. Any war sounds like a genocide if the dead of only one side is counted.

The Armenians are now carrying out a campaign to distort the truth with false documents and propaganda methods. However, we are not all ignorant to swallow their claims at face value.

Our historical evaluation can not be labeled as denial. Objecting to one sided opinion is definitely not denial.

ADL and NPFH cannot be bullied.

On Calling for Consistency