WEATHER »

Comments by sbs124

Page 1 of 6 | Next

Posted on March 5 at 7:36 a.m.

Priceless is spot on. Seems they can find money for their pet projects (a new jail), but when it comes to needed infrastructure, the county claims there is no money. Hmmmm.

On Maintenance Ordinance Dead on Arrival?

Posted on February 21 at 1:26 p.m.

JohnTieber - here's a copy of the civil complaint known as the gang injunction.
http://www.missionandstate.org/ms/wp-...

On About Santa Barbara's proposed gang injunction …

Posted on February 4 at 12:34 a.m.

"No dice nada" does not make sense in this context. What was most likely said is "no hice nada", which means "I didn't do anything".

On Downtown Stabbing at Carrillo and Chapala

Posted on January 27 at 5:45 p.m.

Oh wow. The Independent has stooped to a new low on this one. I personally saw various persons in Judge Hill's courtroom swear under oath that the signatures on the trombetta waivers were not theirs. Kasi Beutel was the arresting officer. The DA's office could not find one handwriting expert to testify that the signatures were not forged. The case then was dismissed and the whole issue conveniently went away. The mayor promised an investigation and years later we are still waiting for the outcome. There Roger, now you know some of the story. As others have mentioned there is more. That is why this thing you wrote is an insult to the residents of Santa Barbara, who deserve an honest police and honest journalism. So sorry that we have neither.

On The S.B. Questionnaire: Kasi Beutel

Posted on August 14 at 12:42 a.m.

That was definitely SBPD Officer Kasi Beutel in the video. The names of all officers involved should be released by the Indy, if they have them. I can't believe how the man who was probably a sheriff's deputy yelled at the woman who it seems worked for the victim. All I can say is WOW.

On Tased and Confused

Posted on July 31 at 6:48 p.m.

I also wonder if she was driving under the influence.

On Paula Lopez Arrested

Posted on July 23 at 7:52 a.m.

I would also love a community pool in Goleta. Great idea! A skate park would also be good, but I prefer a pool. The ice skating rink isn't as appealing though.

On A Community Pool in Goleta

Posted on June 22 at 5:04 p.m.

DonR, I am sorry for your loss. It must be incredibly painful to lose a child. We may not agree on some points but I commend you for doing what you think is right. In the end I think most people fight for what they think is right and fair. We may not always agree on what is right and fair but in your situation I understand why you take the position you do. Peace.

On Stop the Impound Madness

Posted on June 22 at 9:54 a.m.

Botany, and most people here are referring to unlicensed drivers as one group. In reality, and legally, there are two groups. One is unlicensed (never issued a license or license expired). Two is suspended or revoked license (due to DUI, wreckless driving, etc.)
AB 353 only applies to unlicensed drivers, if you are driving on a suspended license you will still have your car impounded even at checkpoints. There are separate vehicle codes and consequences for driving without a license and for driving on a suspended license. The study that was quoted above, I think called unlicensed to kill, misconstrues the facts because it combines data from people driving without a license and people driving on a suspended license (two distinct groups) and calls them both "unlicensed".
But yes, I do believe it would be safer if everyone living in California could apply for a driver's license. And yes, I believe people people driving on a suspended license should have their car impounded. Their license was suspended for safety reasons. Immigrants are no longer eligible for licenses in California due to xenophobia. Big difference.

On Stop the Impound Madness

Posted on June 22 at 1:12 a.m.

There are so many many untruths in the comments I don't even know where to start.
1. Unlicensed drivers can, and most do, get car insurance
2. AB 353 prohibits car impoundment for unlicensed driving only at checkpoints. This is because police departments throughout California were found to be conducting checkpoints in areas with high immigrant populations in order to increase revenue, as opposed to stopping drunk driving. The bill was passed to discourage this practice.
3. The study which stares unlicensed drivers cause more collisions is correct. The data is based on unlicensed drivers, not " illegal alien" drivers. It includes people who have had their licenses suspended for DUI or wreckless driving as well as youth who have not yet been issued a license. Of course they found higher collision rates among that group.
4. If the person who killed DonR's son had temporary protected status, he had permission to be in the US and was fully documented. He was eligible for a driver's license.

On Stop the Impound Madness

Page 1 of 6 | Next

Jagwar Ma

Sydney psych rock band performs in support of their 2013 ... Read More