Page 1 of 17
Posted on September 16 at 11:17 a.m.
She makes a few good points - nepotism should never dictate justice. But as the rest of the commentators pointed out, its the criminal that is responsible for their sentence, not the DA or the SBPD or the judge.
Maybe, just maybe the Latinos who commit the crimes are the ones who are responsible for their time... You think?
Every single time I have been called into court for jury duty there are Latino police, Latino court employees, Latino jurors and Latino lawyers and Latino Judges... There is no race issue here! There is a crime issue among a certain demographic that thinks they deserve special treatment though... I wonder which demographic that is? Hmm....
How about dont commit the crime to begin with? This isnt about releasing a wrongfully convicted person, its about lessening the sentences of convicted criminals because her feeling is that they dont deserve what they were given... violent, worthless people who should be locked away and more than likely deported. Good grief she's clueless.
No sympathy here, not an ounce.
On Unfair Sentencing in Santa Barbara?
Posted on August 26 at 3:24 p.m.
It was rhetorical Jarvis but I do appreciate your lengthy and well thought out list.
We've been fleeced, had, lied to and cheated. And the worst part is that those who stole all the money have pawned their fate onto their children and grandchildren and great grandchildren... For its the next few generations that will have to pay dearly for the excesses of the Baby Boomers and the Lost Generation and their myopic use of public funds and the public trust.
On Funk Zone Funny Business Leads to Evictions
Posted on August 26 at 1:55 p.m.
Oh that's all...
Posted on August 26 at 10:36 a.m.
Holy f'n crap Jarvis. I knew we were getting swindled but I had no idea how much.
If I didnt just read these myself, I would have never believed it... the total compensation for some of these (most of these) people is astronomical.
These salaries eclipse any in the private sector and there are NO PENSIONS in the private sector. None.
How did this happen and more importantly, how can we reverse this insanity?
Posted on August 26 at 8:47 a.m.
Hughes is a minimalist landlord. He's cheap as can be and does everything possible to remain unseen by the powers that be... Can't really blame him as the city is so f'd up and the people that run the building department are some of the most inept, incompetent bureaucrats the world has ever seen. Talk about nepotism. The city and its staff are living breathing cliches. They live to extort money from business owners and landlords and do as little as possible...
Posted on August 20 at 10:37 a.m.
Jarvis you obviously have no contact or relationships with the so-called "uber wealthy" for you're clueless...
#1 rule in business is to sell products or services to the available market. You dont try and predict the market or create it... you serve what is there. Your idea that if you build it they will come is indicative of a spectator, not a participant. I assume you've never built or run a business based on your naivete.
Let's see how many of these units sell. So far, not many. And your vision of this area of State becoming some sort of a destination is just stupid.... the tourists dont come up this far on the street. The city would be better served if they closed lower State to traffic all together and opened up the street to cafe's kiosks and small biz. State St should be closed to traffic in the summer. Its an idea that is overwhelmingly supported by citizens and small business owners. Let's do that before we approve another stupid mixed use building.
On The S.B. Questionnaire: Marge Cafarelli
Posted on August 19 at 1:05 p.m.
Jarvis seems either confused or borderline delusional.
Nothing about this development is geared for the market. It was/is a bet and one that I personally believe will fail based on the economics of the community and its insanely high prices.
I dont think Jarvis is either successful or wealthy nor does he spend much time with the uber wealthy for if he did he'd know they dont buy tiny condos.
These will end up as vacation rentals bought by out of town investors. That is a guarantee and I stick by my previous assertion that in a years time the market will be half empty and in process of leasing to a large retail corp. (I have spoken with several of the purveyors who have said they will / would not renew.) The rents are way too high and the traffic is much, much lower than they expected.
See for yourself how well this place is doing during the winter months when tourism drops and the foot traffic dies...
Posted on August 18 at 12:56 p.m.
Jarvis, what is your skin in this game?
As someone who is able to purchase one of these places, I stand by my assertion that they will not sell. Why would you buy a tiny apartment with low income neighbors for the same price you can buy a 2500sqft condo with ocean breezes?
Personally I own a 2.5 m home in SB and have another elsewhere... no one I know is interested in dropping this much for a small apartment. Why would you when you can rent a gorgeous home, stay in a great hotel, or buy a nice yacht for far less??
Again, who exactly is the target buyer for these places? They're touted as urban living for professionals but they'll end up as vacation rentals competing with the local hotels.
My guess is that you're one of the insiders on this deal... while beautiful, they're not correct for the economy or the community. Just look to the rest of the over 1m condos downtown for an idea of how well they sell or dont... there are many that have never sold including those at Chapala One.
And to top it off, who exactly are the folks buying the $40 a pound steaks or the $5 avocados sold by the shops inside the mart?
Posted on August 18 at 11:40 a.m.
This place is unsustainable. While very pretty the prices are just ridiculous. I cannot see how any of the fresh food purveyors could possibly make their rents let alone a profit... I predict the entire space becomes one multi national chain store within the next 3 years...
And who spends $1.2m on a 1bdrm condo? I have no idea... No one I know with the means or the money would consider those units... My guess is that they end up sold to wealthy investors and are on AirBnB 350 days a year.
You cannot engineer a community to act in the neo-progressive manner. The jobs downtown are low wage service jobs sprinkled with professionals like bankers, lawyers and accountants. Very few people are willing to spend $7500 a month for the privilege of walk a few blocks in a place like SB. Where traffic isnt a problem.
This whole project will go down in local history and an utter failure. I cannot image how much money she will lose in the process. Give it a year, the apartments will be empty and the stores will be closing.
Posted on June 24 at 10:10 a.m.
There is no longer anything funky about the funk zone. Its now a designated tourist stop and is printed in all the tourist guides and articles... What are they saying? That its an artsy, fun area with wine bars and galleries and of course, a strip club... In other words a non-homogenized area of a city that mostly looks like it was built and designed by Pottery Barn.
And in the way that the money and the lack of creativity has infected every other aspect of SB, the Funk Zone is quickly becoming devoid of color and creativity and uniqueness. Its only a matter of time before the chain stores open and the area becomes "revitalized" with $1.5m white stucco red tiled condos sold to retired dentists...
I'll wager that in 3 years, there will be Pilates studios, cheese shops, over priced women clothing boutiques and galleries selling 100k paintings.
The Funk Zone is dead, long live the Funk Zone!
On Building Manager, Cops Shut Down Mural Event