Page 1 of 1
Posted on March 10 at 4:43 p.m.
The ignorance and naivete displayed by Sandra Brown is mind numbing. This candidacy sounds more to me like a disgruntled employee who was passed over for promotion, and now would like to jump to the top through distortions and bumper sticker slogans. Not a single thing she has stated here in this letter are backed up by facts. It seems to me more like innuendo and department gossip.
Heaven help the county if this person is elected Sheriff. I would rather vote for the current sheriff, not because I support everything he does, but rather to not have a "disgruntled employee" who seems to have an ax to grind, become Sheriff. Please have some ideas - not slogans.
On A Word from Sandra Brown
Posted on March 10 at 4:34 p.m.
Once again the "let us bash public sector employees" crowd is at the forefront and are not bothered by facts. So I looked up the County Budget available online (gosh FACTS)!! and here is what I found.
The total county budget is +- $840 million. Approximately 75% of that is in the form of non-discretionary revenue (from State and Federal sources) that can only be spent on the designated purpose for which the fed and state provided the funds. Therefore a Ballot Box budget would not get that money, and by law those funds cannot be used by the Board for any purposes they deem fit, or what the ordinance will force the County to do.
The only money that can be used by the County would be discretionary General Fund money (approx 25% of the $840 million) - and guess what - the Sheriff's Department & Fire Department is funded by General fund money. Those departments account for approximately 60% of the General Fund. So that leaves 40% of 25% for ALL the other discretionary services, including maintenance. So go ahead and vote for the measure M - and you will see less law enforcement, less fire services, less services from planning & development, longer waits for building permits, very if any agricultural inspections of pests etc. etc. etc.... - but heck they will have real nice roads to drive on!
What amazes me is that many of the commentators here believe that the solution for all the ills in the world is is to insult, belittle and beat up on public sector employees. Guess what - public sector employees are our neighbors, they go to the same church as you, they shop at your business, their kids go to the same schools as your kids and drive on the same roads as you, I wish that people would just show some common decency and manners and stop listening to the "facts" the get from their Tea Party sources.
On Maintenance Ordinance Dead on Arrival?
Posted on October 14 at 2:14 p.m.
The Affordable Care Act has no relation to this issue and anyone who thinks it does has a "bumper sticker" view of the world. But that is besides the point as facts seem to interfere with the Tea Party types "righteous anger".
The writer of this opinion piece also shows complete ignorance of how health insurance and health care costs work. Cottage Hospital and Sansum are a monopoly and charge almost 40%-50% more for the same procedures (look it up on any 3rd party health care cost comparison site, even the Centers for Medicare shows it). You cannot have "cheap" health insurance and have expensive services - that is the way the world works. If the true cost were charged in premiums then the UCSB faculty would be up in arms how expensive premiums are - so they have a choice. Drive 25-30 miles to Ventura or even a little further; or take what you call Tier 2 insurance.
For too long people want to pay e.g. $10,000 a year in premiums and demand $20,000 in services. Put pressure on Sansum and Cottage as these 2 "non-profits" is what is making health insurance un-affordable in Santa Barbara. I know how hospitals and places like Sansum work as I have worked on the financial side of this industry for over 30 years
And just throw a little factoid to the the Tea Party types - The Affordable Care Act holds health insurers accountable (all PRIVATE SECTOR companies) to consumers and ensures that subscribers receive value for their health insurance premium dollars . One such mechanism is the 80/20 rule, or Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule. This rule requires that the spend $0.80 ($0.85 for large employer plans like UCSB) of every $1 collected, on healthcare. Prior to this there was no law and they could spend 50% on healthcare and 50% on "admin fees". I am sorry that facts sometimes do get in the way of the Fox News slogans.
On UC (Doesn't) Care
Posted on April 18 at 4:18 p.m.
The CHP were there because this was a State of California event and there were State officials making a presentation.
On Bees (and Flies) in the Bonnet
Posted on February 21 at 9:57 a.m.
These wealthy NIMBY's from Montecito are so selfish and myopic that they do not care about the working people who have to travel the 101 everyday to get to work and back. But I guess with all the time and money on their hands they will always find something to be upset about.
It seems that they are taking a leave out of the their fellow bretheren from Beverly Hills and their opposition to the tunnel under BH High School for the subway. No care for working people - just worried about their "latte" being messed up because the subway runs under their favourite Starbucks.
On Montecitans Pull Rank on Caltrans
Posted on February 21 at 8:37 a.m.
I simply do not understand what certain people are getting upset about! There is absolutely nothing wrong with someone seeking a a higher paid position with greater responsibility. Her contract is up in October and she has every right to look for something new or better. She is under no obligation to let anyone know. How many of these "constant complainers" that post here would inform their current employer that they are looking and/or interviewing for a new job (the word " hypocrite" comes to mind).
The way this is being reported, by journalists who should know better, and the way some people are reacting to it, is almost if she has committed the "crime of the century" - Geez people get a life and grow up!! The last time I looked this was a free country and one could take your "labor" to any employer that wanted to buy it.
On Greener Grass in Orange County?
This inspiring human rights advocate, UNICEF Advocate for Children Affected ... Read More
Previous Month | Next Month