WEATHER »

Comments by geeber

Page 1 of 65 | Next

Posted on October 31 at 3:30 a.m.

Off topic, sort of - on another local site that has seen major debate on P by letters to ed's and commenters there has been an exposure of No-P deception. Jim Thomas who heads the No on P campaign has been commenting using two different monikers on one site. I can understand using different monikers on different sites, but using two monikers to comment on one site , and even on one letter , reeks of deception. It seems the NoPes are boosting the appearance of more folks in their ranks using deceptive tactics.
$7,000,000 reasons not to trust the No on P camp and now a former sheriff , who heads the campaign, revealed to be double dipping the comment section of a major local media source. Yuck!

On An Anti-Endorsement

Posted on October 31 at 2:57 a.m.

Why is former S.B.Co Sheriff Thomas posting under two different monikers on this site? Is it to give the impression that more folks support the Nopes? If he is doing it here, is he doing it on other sites as well ? Is this another No on P tactic in their campaign of deception? Sheriff ?

On Measure P: Shocked

Posted on October 31 at 2:52 a.m.

Natty-G, why do you run when I ask you a question? Was the Business Times lying in their piece about SME investment and their intention/ capability to expand by 7700 + wells on their newly acquired lease lands? Why have they been so busy expanding their lease holdings? To graze cows?

On Measure P: Shocked

Posted on October 30 at 7:18 p.m.

Molly & Nuffy are both full of the stuff cows drop behind them. SME has been approved to emit 87,000 tons of greenhouse gases making them the single largest air polluter in S.B.Co. Where were you two during the approval process and how can you be so misinformed unless you are straight up lying?

On Sleep with Dogs, Wake with Fishes

Posted on October 30 at 4:57 a.m.

Thanks Poodle for reminding voters that the P vote is not only about potential water contamination. Santa Maria Energy will become our biggest local air polluter with their newly approved expansion plans, a fact not much discussed in this campaign full of deceptive misinformation.

On Sleep with Dogs, Wake with Fishes

Posted on October 30 at 4:48 a.m.

49erfan, rats , I have one thing in common with you, our shoot themselves in the foot team.
Cyclic steam injection has its problems and you know it. In Alberta it has caused a year long leak contaminating fresh water aquifers and the engineers have no clue how to stop it. Locally we have seen sink holes, surface eruptions and one company pulling emergency permits to install containment "cans" to control surface seeping. I believe that the claims of no water contamination will be dispelled when we get more aggressive in testing. Again, what goes on behind locked gates stays behind locked gates.
Additionally, SME's latest well expansion approval moves them into 1st place among single entity air polluters allowing them to emit 87,000 tons of greenhouse gasses annually. Stop acting like you guys are saints.
I see Sheriff Thomas is posting under two monikers here. Solvangman & formersbso,. What's up with that? More deception?

On Measure P: Shocked

Posted on October 30 at 4:23 a.m.

Santa Maria Energy's recently approved expansion plans allow them to add 87,000 tons of air polluting greenhouse gasses annually. This is indisputable fact. It makes them the regions single largest source of air pollution with the equivalent of 17,000 car trips daily. We don't even need to talk about potential water contamination, spills, hundreds of transport truck trips, etc. to know these high impact extraction techniques are bad for our county. Yes on P

On Measure P Is Not Flawed

Posted on October 29 at 9:28 p.m.

Despite the Nope's insistence that massive expansion is not planned, Pac Coast Biz Times gets it straight from the horses mouth.
http://www.pacbiztimes.com/2014/01/10...

On Geology Experts Confirm Fracking Risks

Posted on October 29 at 7:12 p.m.

Still waiting for Natty-G to contradict the Pacific Coast Business Times article which speaks of SME's touting their potential to drill 7700 wells in Santa Barbara. County. PacCoastBizTimes is a major proponent of the oil industry. I dare Natty-G to dispute their reporting.

On Geology Experts Confirm Fracking Risks

Posted on October 29 at 7:05 p.m.

If P is defeated, Sheriff Thomas can get his big bonus from Chevron for successfully spreading misinformation. Then he can go back to collecting his taxpayer funded $202,000 /year pension that we all pay for.

On Measure P: Shocked

Page 1 of 65 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: