Page 1 of 36
Posted on August 22 at 8:03 p.m.
What other public figure is hated because of the color of his skin?
If the Democrats thought skin color was a liability why did they bother to groom some half-black prep school kid from Hawaii when there were thousands of equally qualified whites? No, Ken, Obama's skin color is his only unique qualification. Without that skin color Barry Soetoro would still be Barry Soetoro.
On Right Racist
Posted on August 22 at 6:15 p.m.
Is racism really a national issue? People discriminate throughout their lives in choosing their friends and mates, in choosing a place to live, in choosing religious affiliation, etc. If race were not a major roadblock in our associations, separate races never could have developed.
But racism is a new word that is designed to impugn a natural preference in an unnatural situation. It is unnatural for a people to be transported thousands of miles from their evolutionary home, their culture, and their kinsmen to live among people who are foreign in every respect.
The Civil War was not enough to set things right for Africans and that is why the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln made this pledge:
"Let us be brought to believe it is morally right to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be."
Lincoln was shot; his pledge died with him and the interests that thrive on domestic conflict to gain power for themselves worked for the next hundred years to keep that conflict alive. I used to think that a "race war" was far-fetched, but I'm not so sure anymore.
Posted on August 22 at 1:27 p.m.
Obama's only claim to fame is being the "first black" president. He was groomed for that distinction beginning with his arranged transfer to Columbia from Occidental. The problem for his handlers was not Columbia, Harvard, and the University of Chicago, but the absence of black bona fides.
Obama lost a run for the House of Representatives to Bobby Rush who was perceived as a "real" black man with legitimate roots in Chicago. It was hard work to make a Hawaiian prep school kid into a Chicago "black", The impresarios who created him had the connections and pull to get him a job at the U. of C. but they did not have any favors to trade with Chicago's black community. They coached him on black speech and manner. They had him join a "black" Christian Church - which he dumped as soon as he was elected. Obama is a celebrity cooked up in the same kitchen as any Hollywood flash-in-the- pan.
Posted on August 21 at 5:46 p.m.
While blacks kill each other in record numbers, including small children caught in the spray of bullets, Obama and Holder are called into action only when the shooter is perceived as white. In that regard we may as well have Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson as president and attorney general - they could hardly be worse.
Posted on August 21 at 12:13 p.m.
Obama signals the end for both political parties. The Democrats have deserted the working man, the family man, and his family. The Republicans threw away their chance at representing those same solid citizens when they ignored the vast popular support for Ron Paul and gave the nomination to another neo-con stooge.
All that's left is the final collapse. When the country loses its human backbone it will go down like Building 7 of the World Trade Center. That, too, was a controlled demolition.
Posted on August 21 at 1:12 a.m.
Racial antipathy is bound to increase when the Democrats use a black man as a protective shield against all criticism of their policies. It's the cheap trick that rankles and Obama bears the brunt of the frustration because the real operators and his handlers are hidden from view.
While no one was bothered when George Bush was called "The Chimp", you can imagine the uproar if someone used that on Obama. And while Bush was mocked and derided for eight years I have to wonder how all those detractors feel when they realize that Obama's foreign policy is indistinguishable from that of Bush/Cheney - indistinguishable but safe under protective coloring.
Posted on August 20 at 6:47 p.m.
Ken and DrDan,There is a function on this forum that allows you to see all the posts of any poster. "Holocaust denial" is what you and DrDan use to discredit me and to avoid certain difficult questions about Zionism, but you will not find anything that could be construed as "holocaust denial" in any of my posts, nor will you find anything that "sanitizes" WW Ii carnage.
The "reality" of anything that happened during World War II can only be ascertained by investigation and an accumulation and assessment of facts. I do not subscribe to the idea that some history is off-limits for investigation and review, nor do I think that people with legitimate questions or alternate views should be silenced by threats of criminal prosecution.
You both are good examples of the uncanny truth of Godwin's Law.
On UCSB Professor Sentenced to Probation, Community Service in Theft, Battery Case
Posted on August 20 at 4:13 p.m.
Shouldn't we ask why images of aborted babies are "provocative" and "inflammatory"? Isn't it because people like Miller-Young deny the realities of abortion? They sanitize abortion by using the eumphemism of a "woman's right". They sanitize it by calling it a "health care choice". They deny the reality by likening the fetus to a parasite, an "uninvited guest" or by pretending that the fetus is just a blob of cells. And after all that denial it turns out that it was that blob of cells that made Miller-Young lose her cool.
Posted on August 19 at 5:17 p.m.
I think there is a very good chance that "money for schools" was just a way of selling the lottery to an unsuspecting public. It is more likely that making gambling in California a regulated activity rather than keeping it under criminal law was necessary before Indian reservations could be used for casino gambling.
On Homeowner Howl
Posted on August 19 at 5:05 p.m.
Slander!?? Nasty? You use the standard name-calling method to deflect the conversation away from legitimate questions that you find troublesome and then you officiously tell other posters to ignore me.
Most posters have an anonymous profile and a screen name which make one's gender a matter of speculation. Once one settles on an image it has a tendency to stick - that's the principle you rely on when you call someone an anti-Semite.
D.Thorn's "wild query" is the result of the incessant anti-Muslim propaganda that was invented by the Israelis to make a defeated remnant of Palestinians appear threatening, murderous, fanatical, immoral, and stupid. It is a recent media contrivance and that is why no one will answer the question - where was "radical Islam" in 1904, 1922, 1939, 1947, 1948, 1956, 1967, and 1973? Where were the suicide bombings and beheadings? Where were the tales of virgins in paradise? Where are the underground suicide vest factories Netanyahu told us about?
Why weren't the French attacked by Muslim suicide bombers in Algeria's war of indpendence? And finally, If European Jews have a "right to exist" in Muslim Palestine why don't French Christians have a "right to exist" in Muslim Algeria?
On Life or Death?