I'm all for freedom of the press and protecting sources, but if the news media uses their press credentials to cross the tape and enter a crime scene, then any pictures they take should be joint property of law enforcement and journalism. It has to be give and take relationship. I can't just go into a crime scene and start taking pictures, but the media's excuse is that I have a right to know what is happening. This particular situation has nothing to do with protecting sources. The press wasn't there because "they had a hunch" and had done tons of leg work to get this scoop, they were following the police to a crime scene and then demanding access, but all the while being expected to be treated like a fly on the wall. Save your indignation for when it's your own story and work with the authorities to help rather than hinder. Shane Butler Ventura
Posted on March 19 at 9:28 a.m.
I'm all for freedom of the press and protecting sources, but if the news media uses their press credentials to cross the tape and enter a crime scene, then any pictures they take should be joint property of law enforcement and journalism.
It has to be give and take relationship.
I can't just go into a crime scene and start taking pictures, but the media's excuse is that I have a right to know what is happening.
This particular situation has nothing to do with protecting sources. The press wasn't there because "they had a hunch" and had done tons of leg work to get this scoop, they were following the police to a crime scene and then demanding access, but all the while being expected to be treated like a fly on the wall.
Save your indignation for when it's your own story and work with the authorities to help rather than hinder.
Shane Butler
Ventura
On Dog Got Your Tongue?