Page 1 of 10
Posted on April 7 at 11:20 p.m.
Endless speshul treatment, vile victim-mongering, and female-supremacist fascism (feminism) for an already utterly Coddled 'Gender' (Sex) will not leadership make.
On Fielding Graduate University Hosts Women in Leadership Panel featuring US Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
Posted on April 5 at 11:34 p.m.
"As for abortion, males have nothing to say in the argument and have no legal standing. Females have the power and the choice. However, as a male, I will go on despite the previous statement."
This is tyranny of the Indispensable 'Gender' (Sex) over the Disposable One. Choice needs to be EQUAL under the law. It's MY body MY right TOO, after all.
On UCSB Professor Pleads Not Guilty to Theft and Battery
Posted on April 3 at 11:39 p.m.
The real discomfort that the UC surveys never bother to cover: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-... Male students are getting crushed by the officially coddled gender bigots.
On UCSB Students Happy, But Sexual Misconduct Concerns Exist
Posted on April 3 at 10:03 p.m.
What Price Utopia : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0byJ2... where everyone is 'comfortable, where no one but anti-abortion 'terrorists' are offended (and attacked), and where political correctness silences free speech?
Posted on April 3 at 2:32 p.m.
"retprotector: I really hope you're joking. If not, you're incredibly stupid."
Actually, it's the 'rape culture' retards who are incredibly stupid. To buy the big 'rape is a crime of power but not sex' lie takes some serious idiocy. Sadly, since the entire 'soft side of the campus seems to be a foolish estrogen sewer, we aren't like to see anything but 'jokes' from Gauchos like our favorite local feminist porn professor or from fascist feminist bullies like you, ganny dear.
Posted on April 3 at 2:22 p.m.
"UCSB happy but Sex Fools and JournalisticTools Exist"
Imagine were the Indy to address the un-dressed female baboons in heat who parade around UCSB/IV pouring gasoline on the 'unwanted sexual contact' fire with THEIR hyper-aggressive but officially coddled public sexual provocations. Imagine were the Indy to report about the utterly retarded nature of feminist 'rape culture' nonsense or about hysterical Hannah Beth Jackson's recent foray into the nursery business with female students as her favorite 'houseplants' (see AVFM online). Imagine were the Indy ever able to create clean distinctions between biology and sociology, between sex and (genuine) gender, and between sex discrimination and gender discrimination. In short, imagine the Indy using some sort of balanced, objective, and HONEST (anti-feminist) perspectives to frame these loaded topics.
Won't likely happen anytime soon but worth a try at least.
Posted on April 2 at 10:22 p.m.
"Yes, but that's why I post it...to show how absurd political correctness is."
Of course. Just giving the snowball another push down the hill for you is all.
On A Voltaire Moment for Liberals
Posted on April 2 at 12:52 a.m.
1) "It was very disturbing." Freedom is SUPPOSED to be disturbing.
2) 'Only one side was in error and there is an idiot here.'
3) fat, ugly, and old or "full figured, cosmetically challenged, annoyed, and mature". Notice how long the PC terms are, Mr Podman. That'll be it's downfall.
4) Yendo and Redspool-thank you.
5) freespeechisnotfree: Nice demonstration of the benefits of free speech-thank you.
Posted on March 30 at 7:13 p.m.
'Angry', as well as 'hostile', 'furious' and 'foolish' are certainly fair game here. Most mainstream feminists fit those criteria to a tee in both ideology and behavior. Therefore, to use such terms for the ideology and/or behavior of one objectively fascist feminist bullies is hardly an ad hominem attack.
Where I was sloppy and did stretch a little was with 'fat, ugly and old'. I was trying to obliquely play the 'erotic capital' (Hakim) card for this particular erotically (and mentally) challenged feminist porn professor. Next time, I will be more careful to give you the background before doing that though. For now, suffice it to say that since prostitution (porn is legal prostitution) is one of Woman's most powerful roles according to no less than Camille Paglia, is based on body appearance (among other things) and is obviously worshiped by this otherwise 'sorry' excuse of a professor, I thought I could address personal appearance in THIS context without falling into the kinds of vicious ad hominem attacks so preferred by the professor and her kind.
Posted on March 30 at 4:59 p.m.
I won't be cooling the rhetoric given how cool the totalitarian ice already is at UCSB and in most of SB's indoctrinated institutions...and given how asleep most decent men and women here are in the face of said philosophical /political/legal/cultural tyranny. You are welcome to formulate lucid, literate questions if you care to assess my viewpoints...questions for which I will give you lucid literate responses but don't be telling me how to communicate unless you can somehow read my mind and glean my purposes. As for the ad hominem attacks, please make your accusations specific so I can address them. Otherwise, stop patronizing me.
Join us for the first session of our multicultural craft ... Read More
Previous Month | Next Month