Page 1 of 10
Posted on July 30 at 9:03 a.m.
Really? Penn State Univ had to make the determination that pesticides killed bees in S.B.? UCSB isn't interested in what's happening in its own watershed? Shameful.
On The Fight for the Bees
Posted on July 30 at 8:46 a.m.
why would anyone oppose elections by district? Anglos will be begging for districts when Latinos become the majority in SB and occupy ALL the Council seats...
On Voting Discrimination Lawsuit Filed
Posted on July 24 at 8:42 a.m.
as someone who was fairly frequently interviewed by John, 10 - 20 years ago, I can attest to what a genuinely nice guy he is. On another frame the always immaculate suit and image would come off as prissy or phony - but not with John. Somehow, John developed a magic sauce that earned his interviewees' trust and confidence that makes them open up. Although John never confused his professional and personal lives, it was impossible not to think of him as a friend. Simply put, John P. is that increasingly rare species: a good man.
On John Palminteri
Posted on May 13 at 8:25 a.m.
Unintended consequences, anyone? What is to prevent 'haphazard use' of nano products anymore than the wanton use of pesticides or hormone-altering chemicals in our pharmaceuticals? This just adds to the witch's brew of products humans are releasing onto an unsuspecting and unprepared ecosystem. Whatever happened to testing before approval of use? Oh, that's right - corporations say that interferes with their right to do business.
On The Blessings and Curses of Nanotechnology
Posted on January 23 at 10:28 a.m.
Another fine piece of reporting, Nick. The only thing I missed seeing was the original argument for the State Water Project - that California rarely had a drought that affected both north and south simultaneously. The water buffaloes who sold this project to thirsty Southern Californians used that flawed argument (ignoring old records from the pre-1850's) to convince local gov'ts unburdened by critical thinkers to jump on the pipeline bandwagon. For awhile, Santa Barbara resisted joining the SWP (and there would be no coastal branch of the pipeline without SB's participation) until the drought of the late 80's panicked South Coasters into buying back into the project). The problem with humans and water is that they will always use more than they should, and then be in a fix when supplies dwindle. Can you imagine the screams of outrage from some of those Montecito trust fund babies and hedge fund managers when they're told they can't keep their polo fields green because of some nuisance steelhead species in the Santa Ynez? Why, the South Coast may have to call out the National Guard to prevent some of those water hogs from cheating...
I can't imagine a better allegory of the consequences of living among the 1% - there won't be anymore trickle in the 'trickle-down.'
On In Time of Drought, State Water in Serious Doubt
Posted on January 15 at 12:02 p.m.
Meanwhile, back to the real story line: Ty Warner paid his team of lawyers several thousands of dollars per hour to come up with this for a defense: "he had an unhappy childhood"! Wow - what an indictment of capitalism! That no matter how successful, no matter how many BILLIONS a person is allowed to accumulate, an unhappy childhood can never be compensated by insane wealth, and also serves to excuse any anti-social or illegal behavior! With such an idiotic defense thrown up in my behalf, I would have tears in my eyes, too! What a hoot...
As to the back and forth about taxes - - get a life, to those who despise them. Like the old bible says: to whom much is given, much is expected. Complain all you want about the cabal of taxes and Federal Reserve Board conspiracies, the wealthiest middle class in history was created in America during the last hundred years - until greed began to disassemble it over the past 30 years. Ayn Rand admiration is as infantile as she was.
On Ty Warner Avoids Jail
Posted on January 15 at 11:36 a.m.
Hooray for Richard and Thekla! Life shouldn't be as tough as it's been for them, but class and character will prevail. Or, should, as in this case it has.
On Richard Sanford Ditches Debt
Posted on January 15 at 11:31 a.m.
Congratulations to both Marianne and Joe - two of the "good guys" in Santa Barbara - and, by extension, to the crew of the Independent who maintained great print journalism for the city during and after the McCaw Meltdown. Here's to a good future for all concerned...
On New Publisher for <em>The Independent</em>
Posted on December 30 at 6:15 p.m.
@bdhaley - thank you for the clarification of your study on the complicated question of Chumash heritage - it seems that I missed the fact that members of the Santa Ynez band were not included in your definition of "Neo-Chumash". My curiosity about the political realities of recognized Native American tribes, including Chumash, is not based on hostility or ill-will toward any of them - but simply interest in the question about how genetic identity, already substantially "diluted," can be maintained under increasing heterogeneity. Ultimately, the question becomes: when do we become a nation of a blended people, rather than an admixture of different immigrant and original resident groups?
On Lavagnino Sends Letter to Congressman Sponsoring Camp 4 Annexation
Posted on December 30 at 5:46 p.m.
Yup - pretty good film. Time will tell where (or if) it ranks with top-100 films, but definitely worth the price of admission for New Year's viewing. Jennifer Lawrence, while not on screen as much as the three main actors, leaves an indelible impression in her role as a neglected/neglecting housewife - great portrayal of female frustration of the era. The only irritation I felt while watching it is what seemed to be the gratuitous display of Amy Adams' cleavage with the plunging neckline, diaphanous blouses she wore in practically every scene. Not that I minded from an ogling perspective, but if that style of dress was common in the Abscam era, I must have missed it.
The FBI scenes of incompetency and internal strife seemed a bit unrealistic, but who knows? Maybe the agency was that stupid - and sometimes lucky - in those days. The plot twist(s) at the end, while enjoyable, were similarly a bit thin.
Still, all in all, gets 4 stars out of 5 from me...
On Review: <em>American Hustle</em>