Page 1 of 10
Posted on December 19 at 11:32 a.m.
Her Honor received such a stern rebuke, not just from her enemies but from some of her best friends, as well, that an appropriate, principled response from her would either include resignation from her office, or a sincere apology and mea culpa in proving that she's heard the public's voice and will cease and desist from doing anything that would undermine or stall the widening project. If Sara Miller McCune speaks in public against you, you sure as hell better listen... (By the way, I think freeway widening is an antiquated "solution" to too many cars, but what you gonna do?)
On The Shunning of Helene Schneider
Posted on December 8 at 4:18 p.m.
Great choice of an interview subject. The qualities she values in friends - honesty, loyalty, warmth, honesty - describe her to a tee. She comes from great California stock and didn't fall far from the tree. Miss you, Ellen!
On The S.B. Questionnaire: Ellen Easton
Posted on November 12 at 11:27 a.m.
Calling all climate change deniers! How you explain this, Kemo Sabe?
On VIDEO: Rare Hammerhead Shark Sighting off Anacapa Island
Posted on October 24 at 11:54 a.m.
I didn't read the one factor that could justify this residential development project: need. In short, there is no need for a housing project for members of the Chumash tribe. With monthly income of $20,000/member from casino earnings, each member could afford luxury housing anywhere in the valley. With the casino, they are no longer an impoverished people in need of special projects like this one.
On Chumash Camp 4 Approval Edges Closer
Posted on September 16 at 11:15 a.m.
Really? "Environmental scientists" are protesting the removal of these introduced species? if true, they should have their credentials inspected for subsequent removal from employment. In their salaried places, I nominate Tabitha who combines solid information with good sense - qualities lacking among those aforementioned "scientists."
On Trees Being Cut Down at UCSB
Posted on July 30 at 9:03 a.m.
Really? Penn State Univ had to make the determination that pesticides killed bees in S.B.? UCSB isn't interested in what's happening in its own watershed? Shameful.
On The Fight for the Bees
Posted on July 30 at 8:46 a.m.
why would anyone oppose elections by district? Anglos will be begging for districts when Latinos become the majority in SB and occupy ALL the Council seats...
On Voting Discrimination Lawsuit Filed
Posted on July 24 at 8:42 a.m.
as someone who was fairly frequently interviewed by John, 10 - 20 years ago, I can attest to what a genuinely nice guy he is. On another frame the always immaculate suit and image would come off as prissy or phony - but not with John. Somehow, John developed a magic sauce that earned his interviewees' trust and confidence that makes them open up. Although John never confused his professional and personal lives, it was impossible not to think of him as a friend. Simply put, John P. is that increasingly rare species: a good man.
On John Palminteri
Posted on May 13 at 8:25 a.m.
Unintended consequences, anyone? What is to prevent 'haphazard use' of nano products anymore than the wanton use of pesticides or hormone-altering chemicals in our pharmaceuticals? This just adds to the witch's brew of products humans are releasing onto an unsuspecting and unprepared ecosystem. Whatever happened to testing before approval of use? Oh, that's right - corporations say that interferes with their right to do business.
On The Blessings and Curses of Nanotechnology
Posted on January 23 at 10:28 a.m.
Another fine piece of reporting, Nick. The only thing I missed seeing was the original argument for the State Water Project - that California rarely had a drought that affected both north and south simultaneously. The water buffaloes who sold this project to thirsty Southern Californians used that flawed argument (ignoring old records from the pre-1850's) to convince local gov'ts unburdened by critical thinkers to jump on the pipeline bandwagon. For awhile, Santa Barbara resisted joining the SWP (and there would be no coastal branch of the pipeline without SB's participation) until the drought of the late 80's panicked South Coasters into buying back into the project). The problem with humans and water is that they will always use more than they should, and then be in a fix when supplies dwindle. Can you imagine the screams of outrage from some of those Montecito trust fund babies and hedge fund managers when they're told they can't keep their polo fields green because of some nuisance steelhead species in the Santa Ynez? Why, the South Coast may have to call out the National Guard to prevent some of those water hogs from cheating...
I can't imagine a better allegory of the consequences of living among the 1% - there won't be anymore trickle in the 'trickle-down.'
On In Time of Drought, State Water in Serious Doubt