Comments by OldDawg

Page 1 of 11 | Next

Posted on April 7 at 9:50 p.m.

IV was attractive in the days of Borsodi's. It felt good. And unique. The best of a culture that student patrons, and their good patronage could support. Tastes change of course. But IMHO, It has sucked since then. What can be done?

It's up to this generation of students, to envision the Isla Vista culture they want, and also up to this generation of students to envision the kind of IV that the larger community of Santa Barbara can support (perhaps grudgingly, as old fart OldDawgs, whatever). Students, reach out to us in the County and City please, we foot the bill, but we love you any way! But you gotta reach out to us now.

It is senseless to expect the U to come in and act like a city or county government. It could, but you gotta fund them for that. There's no magic bullet here, and the tuition income doesn't even pay for the schooling, to say nothing of IV redevelopment and municipal type services.

However there may be sense in asking the U, and Student Government at the U, to pony up for helping Students engage on a planning and revisioning exercise for IV. But its a crap shoot, we've done it before... its kinda sorta up to each generation of folk to "step up". And the "generations" that arrive have no living memory beyond the 4 year cycle.

Some other out of the box thoughts ... hey County, City of Goleta, City of SB ... want to offer incentives for Student Housing? ... sorta mix the students in with regular working folks paying taxes? Mix the neighborhoods up, get away from "ghettos", student or otherwise? No, didn't think so, you want UCSB to house them right there in IV, or next to it, and continue the segregated student ghetto.

So.... how about that lost Malaysian airliner, anything new on that front?

On The Death of Isla Vista?

Posted on September 19 at 2:49 a.m.

@ Eckermann - I agree with last half of your post. But the first part is totally off base. You give sh-t to Foley, asking how you do it long term on loans, saying the answer is that you don't. But the sh-t you load on Foley is precisely for doing what you say to do ... stop the loans which were a short term expedient not sustainable in long term. So why do you give him sh-t for this? It's doing what you say to do, but you punish it anyway.

Are you truly a friend to this cause in this North American reality or not? Yeah, Yeah, give us Denmark or some other unhelpful suggestion that ain't happening in this section of North America. Any other helpful ideas before we just totally tune you out, and tune out your unhelpful trashing of folks trying to do at least something good at Casa, like folks Foley and many others? That is, the Casa located in Santa Barbara, CA, USA ... not the one in Copenhagen or some other subsidized right thinking EU bliss state..The real, of the here and now.

Thanks for your lack of support, in the reality of what we live here, not the beautiful reality (or theory) of "there", east of the meridian. feel free to engage locally when you're ready.

On 'Tough Love' for Homeless Shelter

Posted on May 23 at 6:11 a.m.

Michael McQuade, it's up there in the second paragraph and stated quite clearly.... "paid for by grants from the California Coastal Conservancy and UCSB’s Associated Students Coastal Fund and coordinated by the Cheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration (CCBER)."

I don't see "tuition" or the raising of it mentioned. So what are you ranting about?

On New Stairway for Campus Point

Posted on December 12 at 9:51 p.m.

Yeah, tons o' money in the homeless business. It's a veritable gold mine ... not.

On Casa Esperanza's Winter Shelter Opens

Posted on December 7 at 10:04 p.m.

I'm sure ice skating is fulfilling. But nothing can match the pleasures of spending other people's money.

On Ice Rink Project Gets $250,000

Posted on December 4 at 8:35 p.m.

Ken V> "But the vast majority of Israel's Jewish population is of direct European descent."

Ken, I know wikipedia doesn't know everything, but I still think you're wrong on this particular point. They say that the Ashkenazi's are in the minority, which confirms my gut feeling that the Sephardim have become the majority..

On Whole World Watching

Posted on October 26 at 6:21 a.m.

I'm sick as a dawg right now, and Woodsman here has me looking twice or three times at my kitty cat as the culprit. Here kitty kitty .... on second thought, keep your distance kitty.

On Got Mice? Feral Cats Will Work for Food

Posted on October 24 at 5:02 a.m.

I have noticed elsewhere on these pages that Transition House needs some immediate help now. My impression is that they largely serve locals, the working poor if you will, folks struggling with situations but trying to work it out .... not young "crusties" or "bums" on the move who have chosen homelessness as some weird lifestyle choice.

While this debate rages and is good, I'd like to suggest a visit from each of us to Transition House's website, to make whatever donation you can. Then come on back and resume the argument with gusto.

On Demonizing the Homeless?

Posted on October 22 at 11:42 a.m.

For brother or sister spacey. I humbly offer this, it has helped me on occasion when I have said similar things: Matthew 7:3-5.

On Unite the Vote

Posted on October 15 at 8:13 a.m.

I share Mr. Watson's concern over the individual mandate, and the right the Federal government is claiming under the commerce clause. It needs to be struck down, not because universal health insurance is a bad thing, but because its not necessary to burn down this important restraint on federal power in all our affairs, for the sake of this one aspect of our lives.

My preferred way to do this, without mangling the interpretation of the constitution, is through the income tax code and by provision of a basic federal catastrophic care plan for everyone who doesn't have a private plan; high deductibles, keep it very basic and essential, pays for nothing thats routine. You get a tax credit if you file a certificate of private insurance with your W2, and you won't get the federal cover. So if you don't want to voluntarily buy private cover, that's cool, nobody will force you .... but you will have it regardless, and you will be sacrificing your tax credit to pay for it, and we won't have to watch you die for the lack of it.

I'd like to see Mr. Watson's views on this approach. Are the legal challenges just about defeating universal cover and that's it ... or are they about providing universal catastrophic cover in a manner that respects freedom of choice? Those of us who dig individual responsibility and the right to choose still need a much better answer than "let him die" when they ask "that question." You know, the one about the guy who gets deathly ill, having chosen not to buy insurance either for lack of resources or lack of brains. Let's just let him live, having freely chosen to give up his insurance tax credit, whatever the reason he had for not buying insurance on his own.

On Give Me Liberty or Give Me ObamaCare!

Page 1 of 11 | Next

Multicultural Craft Program: Japan

Join us for the first session of our multicultural craft ... Read More