Comments by Kratatoa
Page 1 of 42 | Next
Posted on February 5 at 12:39 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff, who has absolutely nothing to hide.)
Posted on February 4 at 10:03 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Posted on February 4 at 2:45 p.m.
User profile: kingofthekingdom1
Joined: Jan. 23, 2010
Comments posted: 1 (view all)
I love sock puppets.
Posted on January 5 at 5:05 p.m.
These posts remind me of the morons that logged on here to defend the idiots that started the Tea Fire.
Posted on January 5 at 5 p.m.
Actually, what we're talking about is the failure of the article to mention that the victim's DNA was found on Frimpong's genitals.
But don't let that stop you from hyperventilating.
Posted on January 3 at 11:10 p.m.
stwells, I've been asking the same question ...
Posted on January 3 at 4:19 p.m.
I'm not sure anyone can draw firm conclusions about a case from an article that avoided mentioning a key piece of incriminating evidence.
Posted on January 3 at 4:12 p.m.
It was addressed elsewhere in the article? Really? Where?
Provide a quote to prove it, or stop wasting our time.
Page 1 of 42 | Next
Previous Month
Posted on February 7 at 2:30 p.m.
I thought Beth didn't work there any more.
On The Good Cup