Comments by JayB

Page 1 of 17 | Next

Posted on August 8 at 3:55 p.m.

Bill Clausen certainly dares to "ask questions" that have racist implications.

On Six Santa Barbaras?

Posted on July 22 at 12:19 p.m.

Who at these "older riders" who are "baffled and offended"? This is such an absurd myth.

On Bike Coalition Shifting into High Gear

Posted on May 24 at 11:50 a.m.

"Donnelly probably scares me the least out of the three"

Standard issue loonacy there.

On Sharia Screwball

Posted on May 10 at 4:51 p.m.

The opinion of anyone who favors corporate shill Aceves over Wolf is in-validated.

On Endorsements: Measure M and 2nd District Supervisor and Sheriff

Posted on March 27 at 12:05 p.m.

As always, JL (who in no way resembles the real John Locke) gets everything wrong due to his inability to read or comprehend. Pacifica is not "an unaccredited campus"; what ignorant nonsense. It is accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, same as UCSB and the other UC campuses. What is at issue here is a totally different matter -- specific accreditation of their clinical psychology program by the APA.

The sucker here is JL and anyone else being taken in by this ambulance chaser's bogus lawsuit.

As for "rather soft topics", that's funny coming from someone who has repeated displayed a lack of understanding of science. But I suppose it's all soft compared to ditch digging and an impenetrable skull.

On More Plaintiffs Join Lawsuits Against Pacifica Graduate Institute

Posted on March 12 at 12:53 p.m.

Oops, I had a brain fart ... ignore that.

On UCSB Professor Accused of Assaulting Anti-Abortion Activist

Posted on March 12 at 12:51 p.m.

"anti-abortion"??? Could the Indy possibly be more slanted and ignorant?

On UCSB Professor Accused of Assaulting Anti-Abortion Activist

Posted on March 7 at 5:45 p.m.

100% of reputable science organizations, 99% of peer-reviewed climate science articles, and 97% of climate scientists accept the reality of anthropogenic global warming, but you will never see any denier reference any of that; instead they refer only to people funded by the fossil fuel industry and to libertarian ideologues.

Why are these people so adamant about downplaying the extremely well documented threat of global warming and the obvious role of the massive incineration of fossil fuels? It is of course because of money and ideology, not the scientist's ethic of following the evidence wherever it goes and a concern for the truth. If free markets can solve every problem, then why are these people so desperate to deny that there is a problem?

You won't find the truth about AGW at libertarian and fossil fuel industry -funded blogs, but you will find it at

and numerous other *scientific* sources.

On Air Pollution Control District Hears from Climate Change Denier

Posted on February 13 at 11:16 p.m.

"she was a witness to the incident"

And you know this how?

"you think you have a better account of it than her??"

I didn't say anything about having an account ... but I know not to expect reading comprehension from you.

"I don't think this guy should be in jail for any more than 6 months."

What you think is, as always, irrelevant and detached from reality.

On Man to be Sentenced for Punching Elderly Victim

Posted on February 13 at 1:44 p.m.

gardengirl didn't even read the article and obviously knows nothing about the case. There is no 69 year old man ... there's a 71 year old man, and neither the defendant nor his brother claims that he threw punches.

As for Ted Stekkinger's "one punch" and “AA is supposed to be a place for serenity” ... BWAHAHAH! Some serenity, breaking a guy's face.

On Man to be Sentenced for Punching Elderly Victim

Page 1 of 17 | Next

event calendar sponsored by: