• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Comments by JAMY

Page 1 of 4 | Next

Posted on April 27 at 7:19 p.m.

I agree about facts, and I quote a recent 3/27 Indy story on the new 2008 housing component distributions:

"The state determines each county’s “fair share” of housing for California’s projected new residents, based primarily on counties’ geographical sizes. It handed Santa Barbara County 11,600 new dwelling units for the years 2008 through 2014, leaving SBCAG to tussle over where in the county to stick them....

"It was Santa Maria Mayor Larry Lavagnino who made the motion to place 6,824 of those new units in the South County, 4,388 of them in the City of Santa Barbara. By way of comparison, the North County’s entire share is 4,776 new homes. The mayors of all seven of the other cities in the county voted in support. Lavagnino’s motion assigned the City of Goleta, whose new administration is not unfriendly to growth, a relatively modest 1,641 units, and it gave the City of Carpinteria just 305."

On Montecitans Are Analyzing Cityhood

Posted on April 27 at 1:28 p.m.

Hi Robert—Affordable housing is not a red herring. If Montecito becomes a city, it will have a real impact. By itself, it is not a deal breaker for cityhood, but it needs to be seriously researched and considered.

In 2002, in the last round of cityhood talks, I was on a team that was in charge of researching what kind of affordable housing component might be allotted to Montecito, should it be a city. We came up with a rough estimate of around 348 units, over a five-year period (based on the 2002 county allotments). In addition to SBCAG and the county, we interview similar size cities like Malibu, Westlake and Hillsborough to get our estimate.

Our team came to believe geographically locked Montecito would be forced to up-zone parcels to meet that high-density affordable housing demands. We feared that option could create a more impacted community, challenging our semi-rural ambience.

We tried to look at alternatives to up zoning, but options like counting granny flats, claiming resource encumbrances (which would force an EIR), or just saying no, were withdraw from the table as they appeared to be unachievable, unrealistic or too expensive for a fledgling city.

That said, I look forward to the community forums. I hope study teams will be assembled to do some objective fact-finding research, going beyond financial feasibility. In 2002, the Association put out a call for volunteers and about 15 citizens, from a variety of viewpoints, signed up. Aptly led by urban planner George Tamas, we took about four months to do the legwork required to study the uncertainties and provide the community with a platform for a well-informed discussion, and I for one can attest it was an eye-opener!

On Montecitans Are Analyzing Cityhood

Posted on December 20 at 12:01 a.m.

EXTRA: Wednesday, December 19: Kay and Dave Peterson prevailed in their appeal to block the Largrua hillside project. MPC voted 4-1 in their favor. More details to be posted later.

On Westmont Wins, Miramar Moves, and Montecito Association Nominates

Posted on October 20 at 2:25 p.m.

BREAKING NEWS: Judge Rodney Melville has rendered a decision in Jack and Pauline Maxwell's lawsuit against the County of Santa Barbara. At issue were the Maxwell’s development rights for their 1.8-acre property between High Road and Summit Roads in Montecito. It appears the likely outcome of Judge Melville’s ruling is that the Maxwells will be allowed to build one additional house on their 1.8-acre parcel. Currently, a 7000-square foot house exists on a .04 portion of the property which was previously certified legal lot, leaving 1.4 acres in debate.

Melville’s opinion, thought to be one of the Santa Maria-based judge’s last decisions before his retirement, is 14 pages long. It goes into numerous aspects of the case including the property’s history, conveyances, the antiquated map act; two-acre zoning in the neighborhood mandated by the Montecito Community plan; average lots size; ex-parte communications; conditional and unconditional certificates of compliance and spot zoning.

The Maxwells’ argued they had the right to develop six antiquated lots, created in 1887, but the judge could not accept that notion. The judge did agree, however, that the Maxwells were unfairly left with an undevelopable 1.4 acres parcel, in an area where zoning allows only one house per two acres. Using the spot zoning argument, Melville notes, “The [County findings] seem to ignore the fact that the 1.4 acre remainder parcel it has created is the only parcel in the area on which all development is prohibited.”

The Melville writ, issued October 12 but just received by the County, mandates the Board of Supervisors to reconsider the Maxwell’s application and issue and appropriate certificate of compliance that will allow for development on the 1.4 remaining acreage.

The Board of Supervisors will now meet in closed session to review their options. In the mean time Planning and Development is researching how the mandate would be exacted, if the board accepts it. Given the unique set of circumstances in this case, it is not believed Melville’s decision will have substantial bearing on other Montecito properties or zoning within the Montecito Community Plan.

On Bomberos Without Borders

Posted on September 12 at 1:38 p.m.

Caruso Affiliated's Matt Middlebrook has taken exception to my reporting Miramar rumors in this column without allowing an opportunity for the Caruso group to respond. While I clearly labeled the items as purely amusing rumor, I am delighted Matt has come forward to respond so we can set the record straight. To that end, Ladies and Gentlemen, let me introduce Matt Middlebrook:

J'Amy -- Love your way with words, if only they were true. Three points:

1. In discussion with our neighbors about the road, the issue of heights, etc. was never a focus of the talks. Our discussions were only about the creek, and the end of the discussions came after nearly 5 months of talks.

2. The Ty Warner straw man theory, while titillating, is a bunch of nonsense, as is the absurd quote from the unnamed source stating, "[Caruso] claims not to have done the due diligence on the site, specifically about the salt water intrusion, percolation problems, and the road easements." We've done extensive due diligence which is why we're so confident we can build a great hotel on this site.

3. The plan we presented to MBAR was nearly identical to the concepts we presented to the community at the public meeting at the Presbyterian Church and at dozens of meetings, both big and small since. Our approach from day one has been direct community engagement, and those discussions over the months have helped us make a better plan for the hotel. And we'll continue to work with the community as we redesign the project (which we've already started!)

Facts aren't nearly as fun as the rumors, but figured I might as well get these points on the record. Look forward to seeing you around town (since you apparently lost my phone number).

Your loyal and devoted reader,
Matt Middlebrook, Vice President, Caruso Affiliated

On What Kind of Circus Is This?

Posted on September 5 at 6:35 p.m.

EXTRA UPDATE: Wednesday, 5:00 PM:

Rick Caruso has abruptly canceled his scheduled appearance with MBAR set for September 10 and his joint meeting with MBAR-MPC on September 19 due to an unexpected project redesign.

It seems a road easement agreement, which Caruso hoped to obtain from neighbors on the eastern end of the property, fell through today. Caruso Affiliated's Matt Middlebrook said a redesign, eliminating the eastern access road, will be coming forward as quickly as possible, but not in time for the pre-scheduled upcoming MBAR-MPC hearings. Middlebrook added eliminating the road will cause a ripple effect on the entire project so a project hearing at this stage would be useless.

Story poles put up early this week at the Miramar have received wide public attention and may have had an impact on the neighbors’ attitude toward the road easement.

Supervisor Salud Carbajal said he received a personal call from Caruso late this afternoon alerting him of the change of plans. “He told me the a road issues with the neighbors could not be worked out and as a result the plan will need a bit of a redesign--some tweaking. Caruso was disappointed and I heard him out and said the county would continue to offer their assistance as in any way we could,” Carbajal said.

On Story Poles Up at the Miramar

Posted on August 28 at 9:21 p.m.

I have received several emails how to reach Nancy Koppleman for info about her Obama event. If you are interested, click on my byline name at the top of this column I will forward your request to Nancy.

Also, keep that "contact" trick in mind for future reference. You can reach me about any topic anytime and the web email is private and comes directly to me. Your email will not be posted anywhere (unless you ask me to post your comment under my name, which some non-Indy registered people do.)

On When Oprah Met Obama

Posted on August 24 at 12:37 a.m.

I believe the Romero Trail was recaptured several days before this past Tuesday. (It is, by the way, an old Forest Service Road from the 1970 that was simply reclaimed. I guess the Forest Service giveth and the Forest Service taketh away). I was there last Friday (See Montecito Montage, August 18) and dozer and hand crews were hard at work.

At that time a backfiring operation was planned for along the Pendola Jeepway to the Santa Ynez Riverbed, right behind Montecito. Fortunately the firing was scrubbed, but on Friday the road was being prepared to provide access for fire crews, just in case the backburn went awry and crews had to move either from or to Camino Cielo.

I like that trail, and I believe they just cleared brush the bottom (no dozers) to create a one-car access. However, given the options at the time, the recapture was, in my non-professional opinion, the best and safest strategy. I believe Montecito Trails Foundation concurred.

It is too bad it has been left in a mess, but maybe its clean up is something we can take on as a community project. I think we might have more tender touch towards its restoration and personally, I think it is time to let the Fed and State crews go home--with a big thank you, of course!

On Romero Canyon Single Track Receives a Facelift

Posted on August 23 at 5:33 p.m.

Dateline: Thursday, August 22, 2007--The long-awaited re-opening of the Coral Casino, scheduled for 6 a.m. tomorrow, Friday August 23, has been postponed. Representatives of the Biltmore Four Season began calling Coral Casino members this afternoon to advise them the club would not reopen on Friday as planned.

Initially the club was expected to open in early July, but that date was pushed back to mid-August. In the past few weeks, the opening has been moved back several times, but Friday’s opening appeared to be watertight—which is exactly what it wasn’t!

Erinn Lynch, a spokesperson from Ty Warner Hotels and Resorts said the long awaited debut had to be delayed because of a sprinkler system mal-function that caused water damage to the club’s main-entry lobby. Lynch said, as of this posting, no new opening date had been set, but she added she did not think the repairs, including re-sealing the floors, would take very long.

On Jonathan Winters Thanks Zaca Firefighters

Posted on August 22 at 9:46 p.m.

Wednesday, August 23 Update, 8 PM: Live Oak Contained!

It seems Chief Wallace finally got his two days of good weather and good luck, that creates some great news for Montecito--full containment of Live Oak (behind Montecito)! They've also lifted evacutation warning south of Camino Cielo. I think they've sacked Zac on our end!

From the nightly Incident Command Report:

Although, there are still some fuel islands burning out in Little Pine Mountain, the Live Oak Zone of the Zaca Fire has reached full containment. As a result the Live Oak Zone is now gearing into rehabilitation and restoration of those areas affected by fire suppression activities. Crews are being demobilized or transferred to the Richardson Zone of the fire or other active fires across the nation.

The EVACUATION WARNING for East Camino Cielo Road from Gibraltar Road east to Ventura County Line including Gibraltar Reservoir and Jameson Lake has been lifted.

Tonight's Stats:
Acres Burned: 225,568 acres
Percent Contained: 81 percent
Total Personnel Assigned: 2,711
Cost to Date: $ 93.0 million

On Jonathan Winters Thanks Zaca Firefighters

Page 1 of 4 | Next

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
62.1°
Wind:
18 N

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Election 2008 Kickoff
  • Esau’s: It’s Not Just for Breakfast Anymore
  • Juarez’s Fate in Jurors’ Hands
  • Our 2008 Endorsements
  • k.d. lang Returns, Wearing Her Heart on Her Sleeve
  • World Series Now?
  1. The Trolley of Terror
  2. Watch Her Strut
  3. Barney Buys a House
  4. Brad Ebner’s Comeback
  5. Ananda Zaren Identified as Crash Victim
  6. Cold Springs Trail—East Fork
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.