Page 1 of 66
Posted on September 1 at 8:20 p.m.
I am surprised that this situation has not devolved into vandalism on the party house guests' cars and the party house itself. This landlord is lucky that his house is located in an upper-middle class neighborhood of milquetoast college professors and introverted engineers and not in a neighborhood of carpenters, plumbers, masons and reprobate surfers who populate much of Goleta. The landlord would be wise to make peace with his neighbors before things turn ugly.
On The Gorilla in the Vacation Rental
Posted on August 30 at 2:40 p.m.
This is very smart of Goleta West to spend all that money they had saved up for capital improvements. After the lust for that pot of gold inspired a hostile take over attempt by the City of Goleta, I imagine that the Goleta West board decided to invest those funds in infrastructure so that the large bank account would no longer attract nefarious schemes at LAFCO by other public agencies and municipalities. The best thing about this is that Goleta West saved up the money first before spending it thereby avoiding the need for a bond measure. That was good stewardship of the public's treasure and sound public policy.
On Sewage Pipeline Moved out of Wetlands
Posted on August 27 at 9:11 p.m.
It's a plan to reduce the costs of Medicare. You put the seniors with compromised respiratory systems right next to the freeway and expose them to all kinds of nasty air pollution and then they die quickly and it's cheaper for all of us. Towbes is a genius (either that or an evil villain).
On Granny's Field Inches Closer to Development
Posted on August 27 at 8:08 p.m.
So Starshine, driving is nothing. In two years, you will be dropping him off in some strange city or town to attend college and you will absolutely not believe he will be safe there. Then the next year, when he moves out of the dorms to some ratty apartment with sticky floors he will ask to take a car back with him to school and you will watch him drive away in that old Jeep for a drive of hundreds of miles that will traverse some insane traffic like that in San Diego, LA, San Jose, or the Bay Area. You will lie in bed praying (regardless of whether or not you are an atheist) that he will survive the journey and all the driving he will do in that godforsaken traffic nightmare wherever he is attending college. Did I mention the drinking culture in college nowadays? Your worrying days are just beginning. Just you wait! (Just kidding, it all turns out ok - he'll graduate and get a job and only ask for money every once in a while.)
On Road Hazards: Driving with My Teen
Posted on August 20 at 9:59 a.m.
Why was the 16 year old driving and the 18 year old in the passenger seat? If the 16 year old needed practice pulling the trailer, the Maldonado family owns acres of private property with miles of roads on it where the kid could have practiced without putting anyone in danger. I agree with the bike advocates on this string. I commuted to work for a long time on my bike and scrupulously followed all the rules of the road and still I had several very close calls nearly being hit by auto drivers doing stupid, reckless, and selfish maneuvers. Bicyclists are typically very cautious out of self-preservation while auto drivers can often be careless because being encased in steel gives them a false sense of invulnerability. I'm sure the kid feels awful. Most young people learning to drive experience some minor mishap in the process. How terrible that this kid's mishap cost someone his life.
On Investigation into Bicyclist's Death Continues
Posted on August 18 at 8:24 p.m.
Jarvis, how does one's employment status negate his or her status as a "person?" I respectfully, disagree with you. This was a conflict between two people (just as was the conflict between the adult stand-up paddle-boarder and the teenage surfer). With regard to Miller-Young's attempt to attribute her anger to some organic source (i.e., hormones associated with pregnancy), well, I agree that sounds silly. However, I understand that anger often feels as if one has been taken over by some foreign force and compelled to act in ways that seem uncharacteristic of one's normal behavior (e.g., The devil made me do it). Let's just agree that a couple of people with strongly held and opposing beliefs came into conflict and decorum and personal safety rights were violated as a result. It is interesting that I feel that I am able to understand and relate to both sides of this argument and discuss it without getting angry. Why can't others do so?
On UCSB Professor Sentenced to Probation, Community Service in Theft, Battery Case
Posted on August 18 at 3:54 p.m.
In my view, Judge Hill did just the right thing in bringing perspective back to this case. This was never more than an minor dispute between people who disagreed and let their emotions get the better of them. Professor Miller-Young should have kept her cool and not grabbed the sign, Ms. Short should not have chased Miller-Young across campus in an attempt to retrieve the sign. Both actions were examples of poor judgment brought on by over-heated emotion. Miller-Young has no doubt learned a lesson and been embarrassed doing so. I would hope that the Short family also learned a lesson. If one expresses himself or herself in a manner intended to offend people in order to make a point, that is ok, it is free speech. However, it is rational to assume that sooner or later, intentionally offensive speech will provoke the response of anger. Whenever the human emotion of anger is provoked the resulting human behaviors are unpredictable and can be unsafe for all parties involved. I would think that Ms. Short's mother should think twice about sending her minor daughter into situations with the intent to offend with the danger that anger will be provoked and the situation become unsafe for a minor child. One last word: Recently an adult male stand-up paddle-boarder punched a teenage male surfer at Campus Point. The assault was reported to the UCSB Police Department and they decided to do nothing about it. In my view, this act of adult on child violence was much more serious than the little shoving match between Miller-Young and Thrin Short. So why did the UCSB Police respond so thoroughly to one and not at all to the other?
Posted on August 15 at 6 p.m.
In a vain attempt to avoid getting up with fleas shared by Jarvis and Ernie Salomon, I wish to be clear that I am all for taxing home owners to pay for the necessary expenses of SBCC. I just want SBCC to explain to me why the last bond measure wasn't enough and how the current bond measure will be enough. I'm willing to pay to keep the infrastructure spiffed-up. I just want to know what I'm paying for and what I paid for in the past. That kind of careful accounting seems to be lacking in all the information being disseminated. When I lived in IV in the early and middle 1970s, there were very few SBCC students living there. Now there are many SBCC students living there. SBCC needs to step up to the plate and take responsibility for using IV as a dorm or they have to provide housing on or near the SBCC campus. Like I said, I'm willing to pay, I just want to know what I'm paying for.
On Unchained Dogs of Pokey LaFarge
Posted on August 14 at 10:50 a.m.
Didn't the sales pitch for the last SBCC bond measure (Measure V, I believe) claim that the Measure V bond measure was all they needed for the next 30 years to spruce up the campus? Why has there been no accounting for how Measure V funds were spent and then an explanation as to why they weren't enough? I'm so liberal that Lyndon B. Johnson looks like a Tea Party member next to me and I truly believe in the bootstrap mission of SBCC (one of my kids took good advantage of it after having a lack luster high school showing). But my big question is: If Measure V was not enough how can we be assured that Measure S will be enough? Is enough even in the lexicon of SBCC or are we really having that old philosophical discussion regarding how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Posted on August 11 at 9:36 p.m.
Yeah Dr. Dan, I remember Neil Young and the James Gang as well. How many times did we see Loggins and Messina and Jackson Browne at Rob Gym? Remember teepees in IV? How about the falafel stand? And all the beautiful, intelligent, witty women who might just sleep with you, or not, depending on their whim? Those were the days.
On Trouble in Isla Vista