• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Sinning Senators Are So Ho-Hum


Thursday, July 26, 2007
By Starshine Roshell (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Good grief, it happened again: One of those awful press conferences at which a carefully dressed little man confesses to the world — while an explosion of flashbulbs reflects off his sweaty forehead — that his penis has been somewhere it probably ought not to have been.

Beside the elected statesman stands his humiliated wife, who has been coached by a callous crisis-management spinner to hold hands with her calamitously horny husband and radiate divine absolution. Because right now, she is the closest thing the American viewers have to God. And if she can forgive him, then so should we.

The latest lawmaker to step up to the “Forgive me, constituents, for I have sinned” podium is Louisiana senator David Vitter. The Republican’s phone number turned up on the client list of a Washington, D.C., escort service that federal prosecutors are calling a prostitution ring. He apologized and his wife Wendy, who once told reporters she would go Lorena Bobbitt on her better half if he was ever caught cheating, assured us — with the most pained expression I’ve ever seen — their marriage was stronger than ever.

Starshine Roshell
Click to enlarge photo

Starshine Roshell

We may be seeing more of these episodes in the coming weeks if others of the escort service’s 200,000 phone numbers are identified as legislators. What are the chances?

Commanders-in-Chief FDR and JFK had mistresses. Clinton had Monica. Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa just copped to a marriage-ending affair. And Vitter’s Senate predecessor was Robert Livingston, who resigned when word got out that he was cheating on his wife.

Why do politicians have such trouble keeping their trousers zipped? Is it the stress of the job? The aphrodisiac of power? Are the women of Washington, D.C., really that much hotter than those in the rest of the world?

I’ve heard scientists speculate that men seek public office for the express, if not always conscious, purpose of gaining access to more sexual partners. (“It’s just nature’s way, darling. Don’t be cross.”) One thing’s for sure: They have more energy than I do. I think about what it would take for a public person to carry on a secret affair (Disguises? Separate bank accounts? Dedicated cell phones?) and I’m exhausted before the fun part even begins. But the real question isn’t why or how our officeholders cheat. It’s whether their cheating makes them bad leaders.

I’m the last person you’d expect to forgive a philanderer; I’ve seen too many people crushed by dalliances that probably felt harmless at the time. And as unlikely as I am to forgive a cheater, I’m even less likely to cut a Republican some slack. Especially a hypocritical one like Vitter who has been marching in the “family values” parade for years, and called the perennially canoodling Clinton “morally unfit to govern.”

But, perhaps everyone’s flawed in some way: an appetite for interns, an inflated ego, horrendous comic timing. And maybe our job as voters is to figure out how our politicians are flawed and either vote them the hell out of office or else shrug our shoulders and say, “Eh, I can live with that.”

If we must continue to see these confessional press conferences, though, just once I’d like to see the mortified missus step up to the mike and say, “I’m divorcing this schmuck because he messed up our marriage. But I’m going to continue to vote for him, and you should, too, because he’s good at his job. In fact, having humiliated me so thoroughly, he’s bound to be an even better representative than he was before. Because I know from experience that after he’s screwed someone, he’s incapable of doing it again for a good, long time.”

For more, visit www.StarshineRoshell.com.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

hey, guys will be guys. so what's the big deal? at least he wasn't molesting kids like the sactified priests from a religion that i won't name.

cynic9 (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2007 at 12:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"Are the women of Washington, D.C., really that much hotter than those in the rest of the world?"

No, actually they're not. But many of the dewy-eyed darlings who travel to DC from all over the U.S. (and many foreign countries) to take internships for a year or two after college are INCENDIARY!

niceFLguy (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2007 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Cynic9: You wouldn't by any chance be referring to the Catholic Church where it's a sin to for two males to have sex as long as they are NOT consenting adults would you?

To the point: I think these politicians do this because no matter how outragiously they behave, they get rewarded with more power.

Also, in order to reach high office you often have to make promises you know you can't keep so the lying mechanism becomes ingrained early on and the voters would rather hear what makes them feel good than hear the ugly truth. Remember when Jimmy Carter got raked over the coals for saying what was on his mind? (His comment about there being a national "malaise") And is it a coincidence that Carter--who even his worst critics refer to as being honest, is one of the few that by all accounts HASN'T cheated on his wife?

It's like someone who is good-looking, smart, makes good money, and has a nice personality who continues dating people that treat them like dirt all the while complaining about it. The American voter is like that person. They can choose politicians who have integrity, but they would rather complain about what jerks they are so when they cheat on their wives, take away our freedoms, and find more ways to step on our toes, the average American voter--like their wives--enable this behavior by not giving them the boot.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2007 at 3:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"coached by a callous crisis-management spinner to hold hands with her calamitously horny husband and radiate divine absolution"

As I've said before:

Best.

Writing.

In.

Santa.

Barbara.

truth_machine (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2007 at 8:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As the comedian Chris Rock says, "A man is as faithful as his options."

The real crime is the hypocrisy.

Personally though, I think that anyone unable to be honest and committed to his spouse--no matter how strained the relationship may be at the time (or not)--is NOT presidential material. But, if I had to choose a lesser of two evils, I would have to go with the one that lies to his wife, as opposed to one that lies to a nation.

equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2007 at 7:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"Personally though, I think that anyone unable to be honest and committed to his spouse--no matter how strained the relationship may be at the time (or not)--is NOT presidential material."

There goes the entire Republican primary offering.

truth_machine (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2007 at 5:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"Personally though, I think that anyone unable to be honest and committed to his spouse--no matter how strained the relationship may be at the time (or not)--is NOT presidential material."

"There goes the entire Republican primary offering."

Truthmachine, is your accusation supported? Does this include Ron Paul?

billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2007 at 9:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

After all, I'd hate for there to be "Unsupported hyperbole" here in the blogesphere.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2007 at 9:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
62.1°
Wind:
18 N

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Election 2008 Kickoff
  • Esau’s: It’s Not Just for Breakfast Anymore
  • Juarez’s Fate in Jurors’ Hands
  • Our 2008 Endorsements
  • k.d. lang Returns, Wearing Her Heart on Her Sleeve
  • World Series Now?
  1. The Trolley of Terror
  2. Watch Her Strut
  3. Barney Buys a House
  4. Brad Ebner’s Comeback
  5. Ananda Zaren Identified as Crash Victim
  6. Cold Springs Trail—East Fork
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.