Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us.
Digg!
furl
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Facebook
Yahoo!A private polling firm hired by Santa Barbara City Hall conducted this past weekend a telephone questionnaire of nearly 400 random adults on their attitudes about future growth and development over the next 20 years and what should be given priority. The purpose of the survey was to provide members of the City Council and city planners greater insight into community sentiment relevant to the city’s general plan update process, a.k.a. Plan Santa Barbara. But former Community Development Director Dave Davis was so upset by what he termed the political bias of the questions that he resigned from the Plan Santa Barbara Outreach Committee. “It was election campaign type propaganda,” Davis said of the questions. Davis is a proponent of increased “sustainability,” which is code for denser development in the urban core and which often finds itself at odds with more traditional “slow-growth” advocates. Davis also complained that the outreach commission was given no time to comment on the questionnaire, let alone make any changes to it. Current Community Development Director Paul Casey conceded the commission could have been given more time, but said the questionnaire was fair. “I’m getting people on all sides telling me how unbalanced the questions are,” he said, “so we must be doing something right.”
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Previous Month
Comments
Discussion Guidelines
For us City land use wonks this is a pretty big deal. Few amoung us are as knowledgable on these issues as Dave Davis regardless if you agree with him or not. This justifies a follow up story giving Dave an opportunity to give specifics on what he has in mind.
sbreader (anonymous profile)
August 28, 2008 at 10:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It would also be nice to see the questionnaire questions.
In an effort for unbiased reporting "slow growth" advocates could be described as "code" for the majority of people who have multiple homes in multiple communities (often with illegal garage conversions,) usually tucked away in a quiet neighborhood where all the numerous inhabitants drive endlessly and everywhere regardless of how much environmental destruction they're causing, all the while complaining about all the development around them. I'm sure Nick could tighten it up a bit for print.
johnathansmith (anonymous profile)
August 30, 2008 at 6:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment