Congresswoman Lois Capps paid a visit to the County's Emergency Operations Center today to speak about recent work in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate resulting in the passage of the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act on Thursday, July 12. While praising the cooperation between local, state and federal agencies to successfully manage the Gap Fire—which, according to an 8 a.m. report by the Forest service, is now 75 percent contained—she said more can be done at the federal level to support prevention efforts. "We've been remiss at the federal level in dealing with this," she said. "The budget is skewed—we've been robbing Peter to pay Paul. A lot of these fires could have been prevented if the Forest Service had the funding to do the things they're trained to do in the off season," she said, noting that more brush clearing and other prevention activities could have been done in the Los Padres National Forest, which is where most of the fire burned.
Capps, flanked by County First District Supervisor Salud Carbajal and officials from the Forest Service and the County, stated that getting information from local officials about what they need is crucial to the process of getting resources where they are needed. "We want to make sure we get the response that is appropriate as soon as possible," she said. "Nothing is more reassuring than seeing our representatives," said Carbajal of the very visible presence of Capps and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger during the fire, noting the work of Capps and Senator Barbara Boxer in getting the FLAME Act passed. "We want people to have an awareness of the complexity of a response [to a disaster]," said Capps. "Most people want to know why there weren't planes out there dropping retardant the minute the fire started."
Due to the record number of fires in California this year, Capps pushed the need for preparedness and coordination, saying that living here means having to deal with fires on a regular basis. She pointed out that long term issues, such as the fire's effect upon soil, should be considered as well. "Every time we have a forest fire, we have a watershed issue," she said of the deforested areas that now have reduced capacity for holding rainwater back, causing the potential for flooding when the weather gets wet. "Soil from these bare spots can wash down with the first rain. We need to ascertain now what dangers exist from that." Since she is on the Congressional Natural Resources Committee, she pledged her dedication to treating this as a long term issue.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
She says: "A lot of these fires could have been prevented if the Forest Service had the funding to do the things they're trained to do in the off season,"
So more funding will stop the lightning and arsonists??
What a great sound bite.
More federal funding is always good. Kudos to Capps for pushing post fire restoration and hazard assesment.
But pleeeze, spare us the political rhetoric.
Our local fire response was awesome awesome awesome!!
osotoh (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2008 at 7:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
osotoh:
A great deal of Forest management involves preventive maintenance, such as creation and maintenance of fire lines, breaks, and road upkeep. Also, staffing levels are also effected by slashed budgets.
The budgets in recent years have been deeply cut, and the result has been compromised response, off-season preparation, and other best practice measures in preparation for fire season.
Perhaps following your own advice might be in order:
"But pleeeze, spare us the political rhetoric."
binky (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2008 at 7:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
binky: Budget cuts have been wide and deep. Its' not like there's any prejudice. Everybody needs to fight for funding. But the idea that some administration can stop arson and lightning is hot wind.
osotoh (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2008 at 9:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
At least she used the global warming scapegoat ... yet?
RForsyth (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2008 at 10:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
osotoh
You seem to miss the point that Capps's generalization makes sense: "A lot of these fires could have been prevented if the Forest Service had the funding to do the things they're trained to do in the off season."
Is that not valid? And this fire (Gap) in particular was not started by lightning, and the wind was unusually mild for the time of year and conditions.
Funding obviously can't change or mitigate nature, but do you doubt proper and serious application of sufficient funds reduces and aids in fire suppression efforts?
Some ideas remain valid, no matter the political affiliation; Capps represents us, and I'm happy to have her lobby on consituent's behalf.
binky (anonymous profile)
July 11, 2008 at 11:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment