• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Paul Wellman

SPOILERS: The Goleta City Council could throw a wrench in Measure A should it choose to put its own sales tax on November’s ballot. County jurisdictions consider the passage of Measure A critical to solving transportation needs in the county.


Maneuver by Goleta Could Endanger Measure A

A Taxing November


Thursday, June 26, 2008
By Chris Meagher (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

As the deadline approaches to get items placed on this November’s ballot, talk of filling the ballot with local tax measures has intensified. Too many taxes usually turn voters off, and with taxpayers already fatigued from two elections in 2008 — themselves containing tax measures — public officials might have a tough time getting this fall’s measures passed. “People obviously are not going to vote for a laundry list of taxes,” pointed out Joe Armendariz, executive director of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayer’s Association.

Making the matter more difficult is a recent maneuver by the Goleta City Council, itching to play hardball with the county. The council voted last week to look into putting a sales tax on the ballot — a slap in the face to SBCAG (Santa Barbara County Association of Governments), which is trying to pass Measure A, a 0.5-percent sales tax increase that would replace the soon-to-expire Measure D and fund transportation improvement projects around the county with more than $1 billion in revenue over the next 30 years.

Goleta Councilmember Eric Onnen, who along with Mayor Michael Bennett and Councilmember Jean Blois voted to proceed toward a measure at their June 17 meeting, said recent surveys indicate city residents were more likely to vote for a city tax than for Measure A. Only a simple majority would be necessary if the measure included no specific designations. Furthermore, the prospect of Goletans voting against Measure A could seriously jeopardize the measure’s chances of passing, as it requires a two-thirds majority in order to pass. Should Measure A not pass, cities have the option of pursuing their own sales tax measures to deal with the potholes, sidewalk improvements, and other infrastructure needs for which the county and its seven cities currently rely on Measure D. The county, which would receive about $7 million annually from Measure A, wouldn’t be able to take of its unincorporated areas’ needs without it.

The county’s precarious position would seemingly give Goleta leverage in its struggle to renegotiate its revenue neutrality agreement, which was formulated at the time of Goleta’s 2002 incorporation as a city. Such agreements are generally put in place to protect California counties from losing major revenue when cities incorporate. At the time, those seeking Goleta cityhood agreed that 50 percent of property tax and 30 percent of sales tax generated in Goleta would go to the county in perpetuity. Other provisions, including 20 percent of sales tax and 40 percent of hotel taxes, go to the county until 2012. All in all, the deal translates into the county receiving upward of $8 million annually from Goleta.

Bob Braitman, executive director of LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission), which oversees incorporation efforts in the county, said, “The folks that wanted Goleta cityhood were so anxious to incorporate they settled for an agreement LAFCO staff never would’ve recommended,” adding the agreement was anything but neutral. Now the city is looking to renegotiate the contract, but recent talks between the county and the city have fallen flat, with the only offer from the county being to forgive a $1.5 million loan it gave the city at its outset. While county officials indicated they need more time to consider Goleta’s proposals— including eliminating the infinite aspect of the revenue neutrality agreement — the City Council appears unwilling to wait, and could move forward at its July 1 meeting with the tax measure to offset the lost revenue.

Tuesday, the Santa Barbara Board of Education tentatively approved a $25 parcel tax for four years that would fund programs to be determined on June 27. The same evening, the Santa Barbara City Council voted to put on the ballot a measure that, if passed, will reduce the Utility User Tax on telecommunications in the city from 6 to 5.75 percent.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

The RNA dates from 2001, not 2002.

Braitman knows darned well that Isla Vista was not included in the City of Goleta, defying all common sense and logic. The cost for leaving IV out was the RNA payments in perpetuity.

That is actually quite fair, and Braitman knows it in 2008 and knew it in 2001. That he now says otherwise shows he should not be part of LAFCO... LAFCO staff should be committed to the orderly formation of civic governance, not the trashing of areas like Isla Vista.

Local measures for transportation funds are actually better than the quasi-regional measures like A and D. The reason is that Measures A and D pay off the cities at expense of the unincorporated County areas, and pay off the North County at expense of the South County.

sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
June 26, 2008 at 1:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Anyone who wants to ride an MTD bus or not have a gaping pothole in front of their driveway should e-mail the Goleta Council members and ask them not to be so self-centered on this one. Their e-mail addresses are:
eonnen@cityofgoleta.org,
jblois@cityofgoleta.org,
jwallis@cityofgoleta.org,
mbennett@cityofgoleta.org,
raceves@cityofgoleta.org

mabcal (anonymous profile)
June 27, 2008 at 8:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

A clarification: The editing process goofed what I had originally written, which is that Measure A would only be a continuation of the Measure D 0.5-percent sales tax. There would be no increase.

Chris (Chris Meagher)
June 27, 2008 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
64.0°
Wind:
7 SE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • How a Group of Ex-Catholic Nuns Saved Their Famous Montecito Retreat Center
  • What Dems Are Doing in Denver While Republicans Ready for St. Paul
  • Runner Killed by Alleged DUI Driver
  • To Err Is Human, to Forgive Is Canine
  • Brian Wilson’s That Lucky Old Sun Tour Rises at the Lobero
  • S.B. Police Chief Wants Cops to Learn from Holocaust Survivors
  1. H2Oprah
  2. Drunk Driving Death on Las Positas Road
  3. County Flood Preparation Work Begins Following Gap Fire
  4. Radiohead Mesmerizes Santa Barbara
  5. Miramar Gets Green Light
  6. Gregory Doan Charged in Las Positas Road Runover
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.