• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Is There Enough Water for a Bigger UCSB?


Thursday, April 17, 2008
By Margaret Connell (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

When UCSB Executive Vice Chancellor Gene Lucas recently presented the university’s Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) to the Goleta City Council, he was asked whether there would be enough water. Lucas responded that while UCSB could get the plan about two-thirds done, completion would require more water than the Goleta Water District (GWD) has available, when all currently projected development in the Goleta Valley is built.

Margaret Connell

Specifically, the university’s current allotment from the GWD is 944.5 acre-feet per year (afy), but 1,442 afy would be needed at full development of the LRDP in 2025. This plan projects student enrollment to increase from 20,000 to 25,000 and faculty and staff to grow by about 1,800 by 2025. It also aims to provide housing for 50 percent of the students, and 1,800 more residential units for faculty and staff. The plan’s Environmental Impact Report states that “to fully implement the 2008 LRDP, the university would need both to increase its current allotment and acquire additional water supplies beyond those presently available to the Goleta Water District.”

A 2005 assessment by the GWD found that water supply could meet expected demand during the next 20 years, based on known projected development. But UCSB’s future plans were not available to the district when the plan was drawn up. The new LRDP would increase demand for potable water beyond the district’s available water supply. In addition, there are pressures on the City of Goleta and the County of Santa Barbara to rezone agricultural parcels for development, adding new demands on a limited resource.

What are the current sources of Goleta water and where can additional supplies be found?

These are questions not just for UCSB but for any new development in the Goleta Valley.

Goleta’s water comes from four main sources:

• An entitlement from Lake Cachuma, which may be reduced during multiple years of low rainfall.

• State Water, the availability of which may be impacted by a decreased Sierra snowpack and early runoff due to global warming, and also by court rulings to protect endangered species such as the Delta smelt. Some describe it as “paper” water.

• Ground water. The district is entitled to use 2,350 afy of ground water each year and can tap an additional 3,250 afy in periods of severe drought. However, in recent years, the GWD has been “banking” ground water and storing it to rebuild the water table.

• Recycled water. This is used extensively for landscaping on campus but is non-potable.

Do any of these sources have water to spare for UCSB or other new projects? Cachuma’s water is used by five jurisdictions and each plans to use its entire allocation. GWD is not entitled to pump more ground water than is already accounted for in its 2030 plan. And UCSB is already using recycled water for more than 90 percent of its landscaping and will use it to irrigate new playing fields and housing developments, but this does not alleviate the need for additional potable water. Then there is State Water. Some South Coast jurisdictions are not using their full allocations of State Water and the university claims it could negotiate for a share of their allotments. But this is a highly unreliable source.

Conservation measures such as installing low-flow showerheads and toilets have already been instituted, and public awareness campaigns can produce some positive savings. But if sufficient additional water supplies cannot be acquired, the university is clear that the project and proposed future student enrollment will have to be reduced.

The UCSB situation is just one example of the limits and constraints facing any new development on the South Coast. Water is a finite resource. If we cannot find new sources or radically change the amount we use through conservation, many of the debates about high-density housing and new commercial development may disappear in a cloud of dust.

There will be a public hearing on the LRDP on Tuesday, April 29, at 7 p.m. at UCSB’s Embarcadero Hall in Isla Vista. You may also submit written comments to: University of California, Office of Campus Planning and Design, c/o UCSB Vision 2025, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-1030.

Goleta Grapevine appears every Monday morning online at independent.com/goleta. To contact the author, who helped craft the original General Plan during her time as a councilmember and as mayor, email margaretconnell@earthlink.net.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

The community needs to immediately come to grips with the water supply impacts that the University is proposing with its LRDP. Fortunately we have a little more time. The EIR comment period has been extended to June 23 and the meeting will be postponed from April 29 to a date that has not yet been announced. The Goleta community suffered through a 25 year chronic water shortage and water connenction Moratorium because of bad planning and the University as the Goleta Water District's largest customer was significantly responsible for that. As an enlightened community we must learn from our past mistakes and not repeat them. The University's LRDP not only proposes to use all the potable water left to Goleta but claims it can find additional State Water for Goleta, to support all the new development proposed. Everyone else knows the State Water Project is oversubscribed and unable to meet existing demands. Just yesterday Federal Judge Wanger issued another ruling further curtailing Delta pumping because of its impacts on salmon after earlier ruling that Delta pumping was endangering Delta Smelt. The University needs to understand quickly that it must live within the existing resource contraints of our community including potable water supply and cut back the amount of new development they propose. Student enrollment must be permanently capped at 20,000 students and the rest of the LRDP developed so as to not once again overtax our fragile local water supplies.

sbreader (anonymous profile)
April 17, 2008 at 6:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

There is plenty of State Water, it is just wasted on absurd irrigation in the Central Valley. That is the way to save the delta smelt... just quit wasting water in the dreadfully inefficient and unsustainable corporate farms (many owned by Big Oil) in the Central Valley.

Per person, the U plan is about the least water-intensive of any possible alternative. Remember current staff and faculty can't possibly afford to live around here, and they are actually living in Camarillo and Lompoc, where they will have rather bigger lawns than if they live in the dense, 3-4 story housing that UCSB is proposing. Commuting from Lompoc and Camarillo adds a lot to global warming too.

Even if UCSB doesn't grow at all, simply replacing the faculty and staff to keep at current levels implies that a whole lot of new staff and faculty housing will have to be found, and putting that housing on the grounds of UCSB is the environmentally superior option.

pardallchewinggumspot (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2008 at 4:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

They are surrounded by water. Make 'em desal. Having a University pursue this will help the technology immensely.

loonpt (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Re: Desalination. The City of SB desal plant cost over $55 million. I don't think the Univeristy has that kind of money just for water. The Coastal Commission has an appropriate policy against small, project specific desal plants. Otherwise every wealthy beach front developer would be building them. There is no water for the amount of University development proposed and water projects do not happen quickly. The planning period for the LRDP is now to 2025. In that time there will be no more water developed in Goleta. The LRDP needs to be planned accordingly.

sbreader (anonymous profile)
April 18, 2008 at 9:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
59.0°
Wind:
3 S

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • UCSB Students Connect with Veterans and Others Touched by the Horrors of War
  • Cory Cordero-Rabe’s Sound Lab Brings a Community - Based Studio to S.B.
  • Goleta Tax Won’t Endanger Measure A
  • Let the Dog Days Begin
  • New Hires and New Roles at SBMA, the Arts Fund, Westmont, and UCSB
  • Brooks Institute’s Mariah Tauger Is Taking Her Camera to Beijing
  1. Early Morning Gap Fire Update
  2. Gap Fire Reaches Critical Stage
  3. Gap Fire Map Online
  4. Gap Fire Morning Outlook
  5. Gap Fire Intensifies
  6. Update From Friday Afternoon Gap Fire Press Conference
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.