Comments
Posted by bettymedsger on June 29 at 6:35 a.m.
Jerry,
So glad to see you are writing about poltiics and look forward to being enlightened by you again.
I also read and appreciated that Washington Post story yesterday about the Princeton professor who traced the false web rumors about Obama. One thing puzzled me. Since truth is the underlying theme of that story, I saw no evidence that the reporter had asked the people who spread this false information whether they had tried to determine -- or cared about -- whether the information they were disseminating to an audience of potentially millions was accurate.
I think that question has to be asked constantly as we move into ever more efficient means of spreading both truth and lies and with most people ill-equipped to verify what they receive. Some journalists, not just people political dirty slingers, are extremely casual about being willing to suggest damning information without checking it. The other day a memo was published on Romenesko, that great online source of news about all things journalism, in which the writer of the memo, a journalist, asked if others had noticed that since cartoonist Gary Trudeau had returned from a few months off his writing had changed significantly. The writer suggested darkly that perhaps awful things had happened to Trudeau. I wrote to the writer: "Did you ask Trudeau about this? That might be the simplest way to answer the question." To which he responded: "Oddly, I didn't think to. He's famously reclusive, but I am a reporter, so you might think I'd ask!"
Yes!
All of this reminds me of a book you and your readers might enjoy -- True Enough: Learning to Live in a Post-Fact Society by Farhad Manjoo. It contains many important insights.
Best wishes,
Betty Medsger
Posted by JoeHill on June 29 at 10 p.m.
Mr. Roberts, reapportionment is a high-minded idea whose time has not come. No doubt competitive races would heighten participation, but so would taking money out of contention, and so would an end to disenfranchisement -- through intimidation, disqualification of ex-felons, exclusive ID requirements, and unreliable voting mechanisms brought to us by the likes of Diebold. Not to mention more inspiring politicians. One of the problems with reapportionment is that it's a game of chicken: why should a Republican-gerrymandered state like Texas be allowed to continue its Delayist ways while California becomes "fair"? Reapportionment won't reap true equity until all states are prepared to take the plunge. In the meantime, we should move full speed ahead to make sure all votes are counted as cast, get the influence of money and the dominance of the two parties minimized, and while we dream of a better political future, I will light a pipe with smoking material of unknown origin.


Previous Month

