Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Facebook
Twitter
Google+1
del.icio.us.
Digg!
Yahoo! Buzz
Diigo
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Yahoo!
MyspaceIn April 2010, The Santa Barbara Independent published an in-depth cover story on ocean acidification, becoming one of the first general interest publications to explain how our planet’s 200-year addiction to burning fossil fuels is dramatically increasing the toxicity of the seas. Nearly three years later, despite much more media attention, lots of government funding, and repeated warnings from scientists, the everyday earthling still has very little clue how much trouble we are almost certain to face in our lifetimes when the oceans’ rising acidity decimates the marine system as we know it, putting the supply of seafood at risk, among other global impacts.
But the public may be starting to pay attention, thanks to our collective love for oysters, as the popular slurpable shellfish is emerging as the canary in the acidification coal mine. “Oysters are the first things being affected that have a spokesman for them,” said Bill Dewey, who will speak at the Edible Institute this weekend and had the BBC and USA Today coming to visit his farm last week. “The science is irrefutable. Hopefully people start paying more attention.”
SCOTT EKLUND
Bill Dewey
A longtime Washington state aquaculturist, Dewey started noticing problems in those seas in 2006, when some oysters were unable to reproduce. Scientists first attributed the problem to bacteria, so boatloads of money were spent on addressing that, yet the woes remained. “We realized we had a bigger issue,” said Dewey, who then heard the leading acidification researcher talk at the annual shellfish conference in 2008. “It was a sobering talk for everybody. It was a pretty grim message.”
Since then, and thanks to government funding, Dewey and other oysterers have installed weather warning systems that inform them when the bad waters will arise (the high-acidity stuff tends to be down low and rustled up by wind), and that’s helped. But the toxic waters are only on the rise.
“We are radically changing the acidity of our oceans,” said Dewey, who explained that burning fossil fuels has upped the pH level by 30 percent in the last 200 years, with a 150 percent change on tap by the end of this century. “It’s a very big experiment that we are going to see the results of in our lifetime.”
Until then? Slurp up!
Previous Month
Comments
Thanks to the Independent for being one of the leading journalistic lights shining on the various facets of global climate change. Unfortunately, the deniers will just use this as another "lie by scientists paid to lie," since they refuse to understand the basic sciences of chemistry and physics. We have to hope that no decently educated person can be a denier, as we also have to hope that educators are doing a better job at producing well- educated students. Climate deniers are joining the creationists, "rape-isn't-that-bad" idiot politicians, and trickle-down economists, as the clowns of progressive society...
Pagurus (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2013 at 9:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There is some serious fail in this article
" Dewey, who explained that burning fossil fuels has upped the pH level by 30 percent in the last 200 years, with a 150 percent change on tap by the end of this century."
The stronger the acid, the lower ph. So, as the ocean acidifies the ph would not be upped, it would be lowered.
It is estimated that the ocean ph has changed from 8.25 to 8.14 over the last 200 years. By my math that is a 1.3% decrease, not a 30% increase.
The current ocean surface ph is 8.14, if it were increased by 150% in the next century the ocean ph would then be 20.35. The highest possible ph in water is 14.
The issues this article is attempting to address are severely undermined by its inaccuracies.
talking_sausage (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2013 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sausage raises a good point about referring to pH increases/decreases in percentages, and that acidification worsens as pH decreases. The writer should have used "acidification" rather than "pH." But sausage is confused about how percentage of change of a 0-14 pH scale is calculated; it's obviously not a linear relationship. Perhaps someone who remembers the math better than I can educate us.
Pagurus (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2013 at 1:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pH is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration, so the relationship between the acid concentration and the pH is not linear. However, the article states that the pH level will change by certain percentages, not that the acid concentration will change by certain percentages.
talking_sausage (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2013 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)