With rust crusting the outside, parking permits fading on the windshield, and yellowed stacks of newspapers from the 1980s easily visible through the back window, the gray-green Volkswagen bus decomposing down in the Santa Barbara Harbor’s main lot has surely seen its share of good times, and most of them were likely within a few feet of where it sits today.
“We believe this vehicle has been staying in this lot for 27 years,” said Scott Riedman on Monday morning while showing off the various parking problems that have been “bugging him” for many of his dozen-plus years with the City of Santa Barbara’s Waterfront Administration, where he became harbormaster in November 2011. Around the lot are another 15 white vans being used as storage — both by those who live and/or work in the harbor and by others who do not — as well as many vehicles of all shapes and sizes with the proper permits that constantly park there, including one guy from Temecula who Riedman recently realized had three cars in the lot and the covered-up vehicle right next door to the VW bus. Pulling back that cover to show an out-of-state license plate, Riedman explained, “This guy lives in Washington.”
None of these people are breaking the law, however, as the current setup — which has been in existence since 1990 — is ripe for legal abuse. Or as Riedman put it, while pointing out other large vehicles in the lot, “There’s been a loophole big enough that people can literally drive a truck through.”
In trying to close that loophole with new parking rules — a process that will be discussed during a meeting this afternoon, March 12, at 4:30 p.m. in the harbor classroom — Riedman is ruffling some of the harbor’s more important sails, with complaints coming from commercial fishermen, liveaboard residents, boat workers, and even some harbor commissioners that the proposed fixes won’t solve the problem but will put an even tighter stranglehold on the boating culture.
Paul Wellman
Waterfront officials say this Volkswagen bus has been parked the Santa Barbara Harbor’s main lot for 27 years
“They’re gonna take everybody’s rights away for a few eyesores,” said Duane Landis, who lives in the harbor and has been a commercial fishermen, charter boat captain, and yacht broker over the last 20 years. “It’s ridiculous that they will punish everybody for so few things they dislike.”
Other business owners remain hopeful that the changes will cut down on the days that the lot sells out, leaving tourists, recreational boaters, and others ready to spend money in the harbor with no place to park. “I don’t have a lot of unhappy customers, but if there are complaints about anything, it’s the parking,” said Skip Abed, owner of the Santa Barbara Sailing Center. “These people have had a really cheap way of storing their stuff and vehicles for a long time, and the harbor is just trying to tighten up on policies that are enforced everywhere else. It’s something that waterfront directors in the past haven’t wanted to address.”
Permit Problems and Plans
Right now, there are two types of permits for all the lots in the Santa Barbara waterfront, which stretch from East Beach to Leadbetter, and include the main harbor lot. There’s the $70 blue permit for slipholders, those folks ranging from fishermen to residents to weekend pleasure cruisers who rent space at the dock and can have one car per slip. That allows constant parking without the need to move a vehicle all year long, save for the once per year check to make sure it’s operational.
Then there is the $95 red/orange permit for everyone else, from volleyball players, waterfront joggers, and other regular harbor/beach users to City College students (who get free access to the westernmost lots due to a 50-year agreement related to parking that extends to 2037), residents of the nearby Mesa, and slipholders with second and third vehicles. That only allows for 72 straight hours of parking before the cars must be moved. Compared to other rates in the city that are closer to $150 a month for the same privileges, Riedman opined, “It’s the best deal in town.”
Altogether, of the 1,139 slipholders, only about 750 purchase the blue permits (many others are thought to be S.B. Yacht Club members, who have their own lot), and more than 3,500 have red permits. Since the main harbor lot has less than 800 parking spots, the combination of widespread user groups means that the lot becomes sold out on popular days and weekends. That problem is only on the rise, according to a report filed by a subcommittee of harbor commissioners that formed in January to address this parking situation, which found that sellout days have nearly tripled in the past three years, with 13 sellouts in 2010 compared to 32 in 2012.
Those sellouts — plus the other days when there’s only a few spots left in a not-quite-sold-out lot — are the crux of Riedman’s concerns, not what the lot looks like. “Aesthetics is way down the list as a second thing,” said Riedman, though the large vehicles have become an attractive nuisance drawing people who think they can sleep in their cars in the lot. “We’re not out to make it prettier.”
The proposed solution involves two fronts: one, a more rigorous enforcement of the red permit rules, which are currently best described as very lax; and two, putting a 72-hour limit on the blue permits as well, forcing those who plan to be gone for up to two weeks to notify the Harbor Patrol of their plans. Whereas the two-week parking would be granted without question, said Riedman, more than two weeks of parking would require official approval based on the “extenuating circumstances.” He urged that the move is not to create a “mother-may-I” situation for harbor residents and businesspeople, and that he’s trying to make the rules as flexible as possible, despite some pleas to be even more stringent.
“That’s all we want the vehicle to do: to move,” said Riedman. “If you’re going to the Marquesas for four months, I think you need to find somewhere else to park your car.”
Attack on Culture?
For others in the harbor, the proposed parking changes are just the latest attempt to stifle the less-than-polished culture of people who work and live on boats. Along with the steep rise of cruise ship visits, growth of tourist-serving rather than boating-related retailers, and perception that the city wants to clean up the often gritty place, some are even calling this part of the harbor’s ongoing “Disneyland-ification.”
“We’re free-spirited types of people,” said Jon Payne, a boat repairman/yacht manager/sewage waste disposer who has lived in the harbor since the mid-1990s, is raising two young children there with his wife, and puts his “blood, sweat, and tears” into the place. “We don’t really plan ahead all that well. Otherwise, I probably wouldn’t be living on a boat. I’m not a paperwork guy.”
Like Landis and others, he feels that the notification process would harm the seafaring culture, would be hardest to deal with for people like him and others who work full-time in the harbor, and wouldn’t help the sellout situation, which he feels is being overblown. “They haven’t even enforced the rules we already have,” said Payne. “Wouldn’t that be a better starting point than raising the ire of all the liveaboards? Yes, it could be run better, and it isn’t the end of the world if I lose my van. But it would sure be nice if they went for other, more obvious low-hanging fruit before I’m dinged another inconvenience and another fee.”
Riedman admits that revenue growth is a major concern for his administration, especially with $300,000 in annual fees just evaporating because the S.B. Maritime Museum rent ends this year and oil companies now use a Carpinteria pier for their employees. He also appreciates the “free-spirited” boating culture but explained that it is a lifestyle decision with certain ups and definite downs. “It’s a choice,” said Riedman, while driving out of the harbor on Monday on his way to City Hall, “and it doesn’t come with a garage.”
These issues will be discussed at length this afternoon, March 12, at 4:30 p.m., in the harbor’s classroom, upstairs from the mail center.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
College students park for free-
Hmmm
So if a 60 year old living in a van enrolls at the college, gets a decal proving he's a student, then never attends a class, he gets free parking???
jshir (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yet another way for the moochers to take advantage of the taxpayers.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a disgrace. It definitely needs to be changed. People are effectively parking storage lockers there.
Botany (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It doesn't sound like the harbor admin is asking that much. maybe a little more responsibility. I say go ahead with the changes.
“It’s a choice and it doesn't come with a garage.” fair enough.
bimboteskie (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 10:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is avoiding the real issue. The fact that the harbor has become a tourist destination. Try and walk to your boat on a weekend past the deluge of tourists blocking the sidewalk, try and find a space closer than 300 yards on any day at noon as the restaurants fill up with eaters and the sidewalks blocked by tourists...
The city wants to deny the reality of the fact that this is a working harbor and instead find a way to pull more revenue from the deluge of folks who like to visit the harbor or Brophy's. As a boater, its a real tough thing to deal with when you're paying high slip fees, exorbitant transfer fees and have to put up with so much bureaucratic bull in order to enjoy what is a public harbor.
Perhaps the city should look at the real cause of the parking headache - the 4 restaurants and their hundreds of patrons and the conversion of the entire harbor into a tourists destination.
iamsomeguyinsb (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Personally I'd rather have students and a broken down cars than a bunch of ragamuffin tourists.
If they have a permit, too bad you don't like the look of their vehicle.
Quit pimping out every inch of space to tourists and outside businesses.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We have a working harbor that should be managed to support working people whose lives and incomes are based on proximity to the ocean and may be incompatible with the "aesthetic" guidelines supported by people whose use of harbor parking is recreational, but is based on their attraction to its authenticity as a working harbor. Decision-making based on aesthetics precludes the presence of many classes of enterprise essential to society, including the oil industry and fishing. Has any non-SBCC student tried to get an SBCC parking permit? Attending classes isn't mandatory, but payment of reg fees, etc, etc, IS mandatory - not a reasonable means of reducing the cost of harbor parking.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I wondered where I misplaced my VW bus. Thanks for finding it.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 1:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If you've seen how high the prices for classic 60"s VW buses have gone you wouldn't be laughing. You might find the owner and try to make him an offer...
CManSB (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 1:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually, SBCC student parking is _not_ free, but permits cost about $33/semester and allows parking in the two Leadbetter lots as well as the SBCC ones. If one adds the summer parking fees, that would be about the equivalent of a full year waterfront parking pass, which does not allow parking in the SBCC lots.
As for pimping out the space to tourists, Santa Barbara runs on tourists dollars and the waterfront/Stearns Wharf is the most popular. Who would like to eliminate Brophys? or the other waterfront restaurants? I agree summers and especially weekends are not the pleasures they were, but nor are they in Santa Cruz harbor, Morro Bay, eg, and probably not further south. California has too many people and is the destination for too many.
It is a working harbor, but it is a self-supporting waterfront, including the parking, an enterprise fund, like the airport. No more than the parking there belongs to the airplane owners does the waterfront parking belong to the boaters.
at_large (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 1:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is there anything in this city that is managed well?
oldtimer (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 2:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nothing the NeoLib/Cons have touched.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 2:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The problem is 1,100 boat slips and only 800 parking spots. There are not even enough spots for all the boat slip owners, much less for all the tourists and restaurant patrons. If you think about it, if every boat owner decided to go to their vessel on one particular Sunday, there would not be enough parking spaces for all of them. Since the City allows folks to live on their boats, perhaps live-ons should pay an extra fee and get a dedicated parking spot, like people in condos and apartments do. If the City is going to manage the harbor like a condominium complex, then they should manage the parking like one too. Do the restaurants pay the City anything for the impact that they have on the City's parking lot. A lot of restaurants have to provide their own parking. Apparently the ones on the breakwater do not.
Eckermann (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 3:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
you right ken
redbunz (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 6:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why doesn't the city auction the parking spaces and the slips,,, I bet some of the freeloaders would hate that!!!
oldtimer (anonymous profile)
March 12, 2013 at 9:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So, some subsidized permit holders have been getting the full value of their permits by storing cars in the Harbor lot indefinitely. Why not? For less than 20 cents per day, they have a patrolled, well-lit parking lot at their disposal.
Nobody else who works or recreates in Santa Barbara has subsided public parking. I go to a yoga studio downtown. I park my car on the street and I move it within 75 minutes so I don’t get a ticket; or I can park in a City lot and after the first free 75 minutes, I pay $1.50 per hour. I would never expect someone else to cover my parking costs so I’m unsure why the citizens of Santa Barbara need to underwrite the boating community.
City of Santa Barbara parking permit holders (City lots # 2-12) have to abide by the 72 hour maximum. Slipholders are the only ones in the city who do not have to follow this rule.
jenninsb (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2013 at 9:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It sounds like they just need more sticker colors.
The primary parking spot for slip owners (blue) could be lowered to $60/year which entitles you to 72 hours of parking at a time. However if the same rules apply as the red sticker, they could simply just give them a red sticker for $60.
They could make another color be $100/year for primary parking spot for slip owners that would entitle them to up to 1 or 2 weeks of parking at a time.
Then you could make a third color for primary parking spots for slip owners that would be $200/year that would entitle them to unlimited parking.
Solved?
loonpt (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2013 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)