According to the Associated Press (Jan. 4, 2013) President Obama has taken time out from his island vacation to issue the following legal opinion:
“Decisions regarding the disposition of detaineees captured on foreign battlefields have traditionally been based on the judgment of experienced military commanders and national security professionals without unwarranted interference by members of Congress.” Clearly the tradition he is invoking here is not the one established by the Constitution but rather by our government’s recent tendency to ignore that document in order to wage it’s no-holds-barred war on terrorism. Article I gives to Congress alone the power “ To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and offenses against the Law of Nations; and, “To declare war, grant letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning captures on Land and Water.”
By not asking Congress for a Declaration of War, President Bush hoped to remove suspected terrorists from the shelter of the Geneva Convention, the “Law of Nations” which protects prisoners of war from being tortured. While President Obama has restored the conventional protections against torture, the prisoners at Guantanamo remain outside the guarantees of the Constitution, which include Habeus Corpus and the right to a fair trial. Here it is worth noting that, like pirates, terrorists are non-state actors, whose disposition the Constitution assigns to Congress (that bunch of amateurs) and not to the president, a group of generals, or, heaven forfend, “national security professionals.”
The Constitution is a document that presidents and members of Congress have both sworn to uphold. Had, following 9/11, they done so, the problem of how to close the book on Guantanamo would have been solved beforehand by not opening this haven from the law in the first place. It seems clear that the Articles of the Constitution will just be words on paper, unless we the people start demanding that our elected representatives exercise and not give away in a panic the power these words give to them.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
So our President wants foreign terrorists to be able to go through our legal system yet signed approval that American citizens can be detained indefinitely by our military. How does this make sense???
Muggy (anonymous profile)
January 8, 2013 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The 6th Amendment goes as follows: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
As such, the National Defense Authorization Act is unconstitutional, not to mention door cracking open to ALL of our rights being erased.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 8, 2013 at 3:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm kinda spoiled by term limits too, let's keep them.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
January 8, 2013 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)