Since 2007, juvenile referrals to the county’s Probation Department have been decreasing in all areas of Santa Barbara County, including the South Coast.
The number of referrals peaked in 2007, a year that saw the second of three high-profile gang-related juvenile stabbing deaths in the City of Santa Barbara in recent years. According to the Probation Department’s statistics guru, Dennis Pankratz, 43 percent of his department’s juvenile case loads are gang-related; two years ago, it was 48 percent. “All juvenile crime has been going down dramatically over the last four years,” Pankratz said. “Things are a lot better than they’ve been.”
There are 338 juveniles throughout the county on probation who have gang terms and conditions. Of those, 39 percent are on the South Coast. If it were proportional to population, that number should be around 30 percent. And 90 percent are Hispanic.
But there is plenty of good news, according to probation officials — there are fewer major first-time offenders, the number of referrals overall has dropped, and the most recently reported year was the first time since at least the 1990s that the county hasn’t referred anyone to the state Division of Juvenile Justice. Santa Barbara County numbers have always been lower than in other places, Pankratz said, but these developments are new. Felony referrals are also lower, said officials in the Probation Department, which works with juveniles on the back end, after their cases have gone through the legal system.
Juvenile felony referrals decreased in all areas of the county last fiscal year, and Santa Barbara achieved a 10-year low in juvenile felony referrals. And not just that, but violent crime rates are going down as well. Until recently, this was not the case, but new numbers indicate the tide is shifting.
Anecdotally, there have been some, but few, serious reported gang-related instances in the South County since the alleged gang-related attack on the Eastside that left George Ied dead in October 2010.
A lot is happening around town that may have contributed to these numbers. The District Attorney’s office has reinstituted its truancy program, a tried and true practice to keep kids in school and out of trouble. Many groups, like Palabra, have stepped up their efforts to approach kids in a way different from others. And the city’s gang injunction continues to loom over the city, which may have led to quieted activity.
And, according to officials, the South Coast Task Force on Youth Gangs has been, under the leadership of coordinator Saul Serrano, largely moving in the right direction.
Serrano was in front of the County Board of Supervisors Tuesday morning to discuss the work the task force had been doing, and the Board lauded Serrano’s efforts in moving the task force forward. The positive response is an improvement from a few years back, when many expressed frustration at what seemed to be a lack of direction and focus.
The task force brings together various stakeholders and agencies — many of which had previously been working in silos, separate from others — to focus on youth with gang terms and conditions, as well as youth at risk of joining gangs. While it got off to a slow start, the task force, Serrano said, “got everyone moving in the right direction in similar efforts with similar goals.” Now, he said, kids are being placed in programs to help them with school, families are receiving support in helping deal with children who might be headed down the wrong path, and agencies are on the verge of being able to compile data to better understand the situation and share information with one another.
But some of the disillusion that existed at the beginning of the program is still there. As with J.P. Herrada, the director of Palabra, who believes the Task Force is a slow, useless bureaucratic process that involves all talk and no action when it comes to impacting kids’ lives. “It’s frustrating,” said Herrada, who at one time sat on the Task Force’s executive council but recently told them he was no longer interested. He said he would refer dozens of kids to programs through the task force who were looking for services, but they largely would not get any response. “I can’t refer people out to them, and they don’t follow through,” he said. “I have more than 60 kids that need work, and they want jobs and things to do, but there’s nothing for these kids. Period.”
But city officials dispute that, saying Herrada hasn’t referred people to the program. Assistant City Administrator Marcelo Lopez said Herrada has referred only one person to receive city services that he can recall, but overall Herrada hasn’t tried to send kids toward the program. ”That simply is not true,” Lopez said.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
There are alot of good people and orgs who have worked to help the kids in our community these last four years (it takes a village) and it's disappointing and an afront that the only group mentioned, is headed by a guy with a very shady past (selling drugs -meth, weapons charges, etc.) Independent journalists need to do their homework on people before putting them on pedestals. "Approaches kids differently", very naive - do your homework, learn about street politics and you'll be suprised exactly what that means. Look, I understand the writer is trying to get sources and information for gang stories to sell advertising, but that doesn't mean you get to rewrite the real history of our City.
SBunited4justice (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 5:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
First, I would like to say "Good Job" to all those who are actually doing the work in our community, you have succeeded in reducing crime by your diverse efforts. Then, I would like to say "Shame on you" to those who would seek to diminish the real efforts by bringing up old stuff to take the focus off their "fake un-united" efforts.
It seems the real reason the article was written was to show the apparent "Juvenile Crime Drop" not a forum to degrade those who have turned their lives around and are being effective in helping others. It is even stranger that an organization that calls itself "SBUnited..." would be the very one who speaks to divide the efforts in our community and has the nerve to say "it takes a village".
I am floored by how off-topic we can get in our efforts to make others look worst than ourselves. If I needed to get out of something that was harmful to me (selling drugs, weapons, etc..) I would look to someone who has succeeded in getting out of trouble themselves. Justice means, I paid the price for my actions "once", SBunUnitedNOT4justice looks like those who are pushing for a gang injunction, an injunction that seeks to punish those who no longer commit crimes, but are being punished for their past activities, that were already "justly" paid for in our real justice system.
Let's continue to remain focused on the task at hand, not fight amongst ourselves. Speak to the issue, "Drop In Juvenile Crime" Accept the success, be positive when looking at others, because it does take a village, but no village idiots are allowed, please.
I personally know the director of Palabra and if their are any "real" charges then he would be in court or jail. This sounds like slander and defamation of character. I hope he doesn't bring actual, current charges against the SBunUnited folks.
ystrive (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Whoa, before we start patting backs, how does this stat correlate with the practice of trying juveniles as adults and sending them to prison?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ystrive everyone knows you take credit for work you never did. You have built a program off other peoples work. I have also heard you tell people to go back to mexico if they dont like it here. Grapevine also says several woman have left your org because you talk down to them. And wasn't it you who kicked a young man from the eastside out of a retreat for basically doing nothing?
Santa Barbara, anyone in their right mind would not be in favor of a gang injunction, anywhere. We need to stop all injunctions. Regarding ystrive's comments, sometimes you have to speak the truth and feathers get ruffled. SB needs to protect our community from people who are dangerous and manipulating our community for their own financial and personal gains. Check the court records, paperwork speaks for itself. Do you even know the community you pretend to help? How is your spanish these days? Do you know how to talk to a monolingual immigrant parent in their own language? I doubt it, you are making a living off people you dont even know how to communicate with. You do have one language down an that's the language of hyperbole. All snakes to the river, we have a garden to plant.
SBunited4justice (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 7:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with ystrive. There's no way a guy who was selling meth or had weapons charges would be allowed to work with kids! Where you get that stuff sbunited4justice? You must hate the guy. Watch out or u will be sued! Hey it's easy to check out. If u want to bad mouth a guy you better prove it.
Now ur going to make mr ystrive or palabra prove ur wrong and youl be begin them not to sue u. Come on, if he did what u say he'd be in jail for anos, pal, not workin with kids!
Go ahead ystrive prove this guy is wrong! Make him eat it!I
poderchicano (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 10:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would argue that he would be even more of an ideal youth leader if he really had been a "drug dealer" ect and turned his life around. It demonstrates to kids that it can be done, and he could more realistically illustrate to kids the dangers of gang life.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 23, 2012 at 11:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with Ken.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 24, 2012 at 2:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No, no, no we need some rich preppy boys to tell these kids how mommy and daddy will always bail them out and get them a car, or send them to Europe for the summer. I am sure these kids can relate to that, maybe one will call himself "El Biff loko"
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
September 24, 2012 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ken and Bill, with all due respect, neither of you know what your talking about. Have you asked a young person in a gang who these people are and why and how certain people have influence over them? Even if you did you probably won't get the truth because there is a street code that has been engrained from day one. Ask a parent whose kid needs support and I'm sure you might get a different perspective. Bill Clausen you said and I quote:
"cops with assault rifles…a gang injunction…we didn't need it before but we need it now."
"…a friend connected to the sheriff's department told me"
"…going back to the cop who seemed like a nice guy"
Are you a cop Bill?
So let me get this straight, your in favor of a unconstitutional gang injunction but support someone who could have been dealing meth and had weapons charges as an ADULT to work with kids. I think that your really out of touch with this subject or maybe you work for the SBPD or DA's office.
We should always support redemption for everyone, especially youth, but we should also provide our youth with a broad base of mentors and preferably including those who haven't pledged allegiances to the types of lifestyles that are destroying our communities and our children. Young people are very impressionable and your kidding yourself if you don't think they idolize some of the same behavior you think is a pre-requisite for connecting with them.
Don't under estimate young people, they will listen to anyone who treats them with respect, looks them in the eye and doesn't show fear or judgements. The problem isn't our youth, it's the culture of Santa Barbara that isolates, deports, discriminates and provides low wage jobs, poor education and high housing costs for the Latino community. Not to mention the violation or their rights by police day after day. Instead of changing it's intolerant behavior SB wants to take the easy way out and trust our kids with those we just know enough about, wash our hands of the responsibility.
Gang injunctions are wrong period, they don't work. I won't comment on this thread any further. However, I won't apologize for being so intolerant of meth or grown adults who may have infected our communities with it in the first place. BTW a person can't be sued for telling the truth, and that is the least of my worries when talking about these issues.
SBunited4justice (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 12:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@SBunited4justice: My quote "cops with assault rifles…a gang injunction…we didn't need it before but we need it now." should have had a question mark at the end of it. That would have made it clear that I'm opposed to the increasing Police State. I realize it was a big oversight on my part and understand the confusion my lack of attention created. Lesson learned on my part, however, your other comments are not accurate:
"…a friend connected to the sheriff's department told me" Irrelevant to the topic at hand.
"…going back to the cop who seemed like a nice guy"
If you had quoted the entire quote, I was complaining about how cops up in Santa Ynez Valley pull people over at random for being out at night.
Therefore: A: I am against the gang injunction; B: I don't think creating a Soylant Green-like Police State is the answer; C: I'm not a cop; D: There are good and bad people in the Sheriff's Department, (hence among others, my friend) and E: Ken and I know what we are talking about.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 2:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bill Clausen, I have gone through and read everyone of your 400 plus posts on the independent. You are not fooling anybody. You and your self proclaimed blog buddies, Italiansburg, Hank, and others, have perspectives that are hateful and haven't been in support of at-risk youth or of the immigrant community most affected by SB's pattern of discrimination, police brutality and white privilege. Exactly how many gang members do you personally know? How many immigrant families have shared a meal with, that you don't work for you? How many young people addicted to meth do you mentor? Walk the walk first and enough with the arm chair commentating, get out there and do something - don't just make a donation and think that will fix the problem. When you have that under your belt, I will be a little more receptive to your opinion on this subject.
SBunited4justice (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@SB: When you can come up with something I've written which is racist, I'll debate with you, but until you can back up your accusations, I won't waste my time defending myself against your unsupported accusations. And by the way, when you quote me, provide a date so that I know where your quoting from. The ball is in your court.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yendopostal - " 'I lived in Mexico for 6 months'...you remind me of the person who proves their not racist by saying: I have a black friend, I'm not racist. We have all heard that one before." SBunited4justice (anonymous profile)
November 14, 2011 at 3:38 p.m
http://www.independent.com/news/2011/...
But then you say " Exactly how many gang members do you personally know?".
So it doesn't matter because even if I do mention that I know gang members, you can simply say "We have all heard that one before" and if I don't know any gang members, then *that* makes me at best, uniformed, and at worst, racist.
I'm very familiar with the type of arguments you present and all I see is someone lobbing a lot of anger my way because I dare to point out that you had me wrong in the first place, and continue to accuse me of things without having any proof.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
And what qualifies you to speak on this subject SBUnited?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 3:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@SB: I would like to add one more thing: My friends--who run the gamut of race/ideology/income, are not people I will pimp to curry approval from you or anyone else. I do not associate with someone merely to make myself look like a good White Liberal, the friends I have of different races are friends I have because we enjoy our time together, not to fulfill any social quota. To do otherwise would be the ultimate show of disrespect on my part.
As for the "white privilege" argument, I'm 50% Assyrian, 25% Irish/Catholic, and 25% Norwegian. I can assure that when those people came to this country, (especially the Irish/Catholic and the Assyrians) they were granted no special favors, and my mother and her family suffered far worse discrimination than many today who wear their badge of victimhood as if it were an I.D. badge.
Furthermore, my friends of Mexican heritage have told me that if you didn't hang out with the Homies and dared to do well in school, you faced being put down by others of your own race for "acting white"--same thing with Black kids who try to better themselves. I notice however, *that* doesn't get addressed.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 4:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Exactly how many gang members do you personally know? "
How many Confederate flag waving Rednecks to you know?
My answer to your question: None that I know of.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 25, 2012 at 4:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)