California Attorney General Kamala Harris has called Cottage Health Systems into her examining room, serving Santa Barbara’s medical powerhouse with a subpoena in her ongoing investigation into the consolidation of health services and possible potential conflicts with federal antitrust laws.
The Wall Street Journal first reported on the Attorney General’s probe September 13, noting subpoenas have been served to several of California’s biggest medical institutions, including San Francisco’s Dignity Health, San Diego’s Scripps Health and Sharp HealthCare, and Northern California’s Sutter Health, alongside some of the state’s largest insurance providers.
Both the Office of the Attorney General and Cottage representatives have been tight-lipped about the issue, with Harris’s spokespeople refusing to confirm or deny the investigation’s existence. However, Janet O’Neill, Cottage Health Systems’ public affairs director, confirmed that Cottage was contacted by the Attorney General’s office in December 2011, requesting information related to “health system contracts.” “We fully complied with the request, but haven’t heard anything from them since then,” O’Neill said.
While O’Neill could not provide any further information on the investigation, she recognized her organization’s unique position in the South Coast medical arena — Cottage Health Systems is the only hospital operator in the South County, a responsibility O’Neill said Cottage CEO Ron Werft views as a “very serious responsibility.”
Cottage’s relative monopoly on Santa Barbara medical care arose gradually. The nonprofit acquired Santa Ynez Valley Hospital in 1995 and added Goleta Valley in 1996. In 2003, when Catholic Healthcare West put St. Francis Hospital – bleeding red ink – up for sale, Cottage purchased it for use as employee housing. St. Francis shuttered its doors less than two weeks before the sale was finalized. Cottage’s major competition was extinct.
And without competition, some medical professionals and physicians could feel cornered into accepting rates from the area’s only major employer, said Dr. Dante Pieramici, president of the Santa Barbara County Medical Society’s Board of Directors.
“It seems like the future of medicine, at least with the Affordable Care Act going through, is going to be better coordination between doctors and hospitals,” Pieramici said. “However, the concern in Santa Barbara is that there’s only one hospital. If you only have one game in town, you either have to play on that playing field or you’re out. It becomes difficult to negotiate with only one option.” Pieramici said this is likely the reason the Attorney General chose to investigate Cottage Hospital. Competition, Pieramici said, serves the dual purpose of keeping prices down and “driving excellence.”
Instead, prices at Cottage have gone up in recent years, according to Roger Perry, owner of Perry Insurance Service. Perry said the rise in costs was due to “a multitude of factors,” including rises in medical pricing nationwide, but was in a large part determined by Cottage being the “sole player here for 25 miles in every direction,” something he said has “impacted the insurance industry’s ability to negotiate rates.” [Full disclosure: Perry is The Santa Barbara Independent’s health-insurance broker.]
Difficult negotiations and higher prices can harm the customer, Perry said, such as when Anthem Blue Cross pulled its senior Medicare beneficiary Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) plan at the end of 2011 when it was unable to reach a negotiated rate arrangement with Cottage Health Systems. “I don’t know who the bad guy is; I just know who the victim is,” Perry said. “That is the consumer, who lost a valuable product.” Despite his reservations, Pieramici said that Cottage is a “top notch” hospital organization that “has for the most part tried to work with physicians.”
State Assemblymember Das Williams said he had mixed feelings on the issue, maintaining that there was more to the health-care crisis than hospital consolidation, although Santa Barbara County’s single provider was bound to increase costs. “In my experience, we’re lucky to have Cottage doing the work that they do here, but it does mean that there is a long-term problem when you only have one provider,” Williams said.
Though the result of the Attorney General’s investigation remains to be seen, O’Neill said Cottage remains committed to its patients, competition or not. “As the only hospital system in the immediate region, we can’t turn anyone away that wants care,” O’Neill said.
This story was amended on September 20, 2012 to clarify that Cottage Health Systems is the only hospital operator in the South County. (Marion Medical Center in Santa Maria is not owned by Cottage.) The timing of St. Francis’s closing was also clarified.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Cottage Hospital is a treasure for the people of SB County. World class medical care in a small beach community. We should all count ourselves very lucky that amidst a very complex economic / political / medical climate, we have an organization that really cares about people.
B. Craig
loganwc (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 7:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
loganwc, how do you think your message is received by those who are denied medical care, kicked out of the hospital early, gouged by monopolistic pricing, infected with staph, and/or woken up by helicopters?
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Cottage Health Systems is the only hospital operator in the county ..." Really, perhaps the reporter is not familiar with the Marian Regional Medical Center in Santa Maria.
discoboy (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 10:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
First, the economy of scale has not helped medical consumers in Santa Barbara.
Second, Cottage is a community hospital and does not present world class healthcare. Go to UCLA or UCSF if that is what you want.
Third, Kamala Harris is a moron. Look at her record of "being tough" in San Francisco if you want proof. I wish we had someone competent to look into the valid questions about violation of anti trust statutes.
Fourth and finally, Cottage is no different than any other community hospital with regards to rising costs etc. With an indigent population of around %50 they have a tough job regardless of what the economic delivery model is.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is Cottage stopping anyone from opening a hospital?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nope, but the upfront economics, including negotiating with insurance companies etc. is untenable since the patient numbers are not sufficient enough to support the competition.
Even Sansum is barely viable and they are headed once again for trouble. I'd like to see Kaiser buy Sansum which would add economic clout beyond that of Cottage, a very good standard of practice, and the ability to grow influence and not just survive.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 20, 2012 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Recently, Cottage refused to accept the rates offered by Anthem's senior program when all of the local doctors agreed on the rates. With no other local hospital, Anthem seniors who needed hospitalization had to go to Santa Maria or Ventura hospitals where the rates were accepted. Sounds like a monopoly to me.
joeinsb (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 9:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It not only sounds like monopoly it sounds intolerable.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
kv-correct on both counts. While I acknowledge the difficulty of providing health care on the central coast I do not excuse the obvious failings of our monopoly community hospital.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Is Cottage stopping anyone from opening a hospital?
-- Ken_Volok
In effect, yes. With a monopoly position, they can control pricing and thereby make potential competitors unprofitable. This is exacerbated by the limited population in the area.
SezMe (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 12:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That in my opinion is an immoral scenario, people's lives are at stake in such a circumstance. Ventura has a County hospital - perhaps SB should have a full fledged one.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 12:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This battle was lost long ago and like most things, in small increments rather than in a broad swath. Maybe our former council person had it right: it's time to start drinking alcohol for breakfast to cope with the general state of things...
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 4:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I imagine Cottage would jump at the opportunity to gobble up both Sansum and Visiting Nurses (VNA).
joeinsb (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 7:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Kamala Harris is using the Attorney General's office to campaign for Governor. Press Releases from the California AG office do not announce that the Calif AG has done something for the citizens. The Press Releases are self serving propaganda referring to K. Harris numerous times by name. This is probably an illegal use of the Office personnel and computers, but who do you call to prosecute the AG??
Sign up for Her AG press releases to see what I mean.
-VG
vangary (anonymous profile)
September 21, 2012 at 8:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cottage tried to gobble up Sansum Clinic but the effort failed. Unfortunately the liaison between Sansum and the SB Cancer Center is not a long term economic solution so we can look forward to Cottage attempting to strengthen their monopoly in the future.
italiansurg (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 4:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I remember when Goleta Valley opened their birthing center and Cottage lost deliveries to Goleta. It did not take long for Cottage to remodel and provide a competitive birthing center.
Now without competition we will lose innovation and price competitiveness. Really a shame.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 4:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are benefits to a large healthcare provider; that weight can be thrown around for good, too. Santa Barbara Rehabilitation Institute, as an independent entity, could no longer stay afloat. Merging with (being bought by, depending on who you ask) Cottage a few years back allowed them to stay open, and the community benefits from having an acute rehab facility, which is rare in a town this small.
Sothep (anonymous profile)
September 22, 2012 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)