In a press release issued late last week, the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) announced that, based on the most recent findings of its staff, the Shoreline fault near PG&E’s Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant does not propose any risk beyond what the plant is already designed to withstand. The staff report, which comes amid heavy state-level scrutiny about the plant’s seismic safety and the potential for horrific environmental impacts associated with planned 3-d seismic testing, concludes that, based on “conservative estimates” of the damage that a quake along the Shoreline fault could cause, there is a “reasonable assurance of safety.”
According to the report, after conducting a site visit last fall and seeking feedback from independent researchers about the potential for ground motion caused by a quake along the recently discovered Shoreline fault, NRC staffers have concluded that the facility, which was built in the early 1970s and retrofitted in the early ’80s, can handle any sort of trouble that may shake down from a quake generated along the Shoreline fault. “All of those ground motions fell within Diablo Canyon’s existing design limits, which are based on ground motion associated with an earthquake from the larger Hosgri fault near the plant,” summed up the press release.
Noting that regular evaluation of the plant’s earthquake preparedness is a fundamental aspect of the terms and conditions that Diablo currently operates under, NRC spokesperson Victor Dricks offered Tuesday that last week’s announcement had nothing to do with the ongoing debate over the risks associated with PG&E’s planned 3-d imaging of the various faults near the oceanside plant. (That controversy is slated for further discussion next month at a meeting of the California Coastal Commission.) He added that not only is the NRC planning on additional safety review of the plant in the coming months as it relates to earthquakes but also that they are looking forward to seeing the findings of PG&E’s proposed testing.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Now that we know the Nuclear Waste plant is 'safe' from the Shoreline Fault, and have already studied the rest at some length, the NRC should cancel the seismic testing.
On Facebook: Stop the Diablo Canyon Seismic Testing
spiritpen (anonymous profile)
October 18, 2012 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is the same NRC that kicked out its Chairman earlier this year for voting against approving a new nuclear power plant back east because we haven't yet learned everything we can from what happened at Fukushima. Zero credibility when it comes to "safety."
rhw (anonymous profile)
October 18, 2012 at 11:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The NRC is a bought and paid for Special Interest Group for the Nuclear Power industry. When will this entity be reformed or eliminated?
States should have a say in whether they want a Plant in their State.
Georgy (anonymous profile)
October 18, 2012 at 3:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The NRC used an oil company engineering firm that's been connected to the industry since the 40's as the contractor that doesn't even have a geology division.
How much you wanna bet that these guys didn't do anything more than review PG&E's 2011 report claiming that Shoreline wasn't a danger. The NRC is pulling a fast one by using this contractor, making it appear as if there was actually some kind of independent investigation.
This is another example of how NRC does everything possible to help clear the way of any real issues. I can imagine PG&E on the phone to the NRC, asking for their help to pull this off!
There should a requirement that every time a nuclear company contacts the NRC, it keeps records of everything the two of them say that is available to the public.
AAClearinghouse (anonymous profile)
October 19, 2012 at 12:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's no surprise that the safety of another nuclear power plant has been over-stated. The Mark I, boiling water reactor has design flaws that make it dangerous on many levelsl. Not only have we learned a lot from the many melt-downs of nuclear reactors in Fukushima during the Tsunami, but we also have learned more than we thought previously about all the other power plants in Japan that went off-line during their emergency. We barely averted the loss of a country-it is astounding how many reactors were threatened all at once. Read Arnie Gundersen's work to learn the ugly details. He should know and he now he does. Thank goodness for his due diligence.
therailer (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2012 at 12:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here's Gundersens website with videos too! http://fairewinds.org/
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
October 21, 2012 at 6:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)