Just as it seemed that actual work crews might soon descend upon the longest running hole-in-the-ground and non-construction site within city limits — 11 years now unbuilt — the new owner of the proposed La Entrada development has asked City Hall to consider major changes to the design and timing of his plans to build a unified, if sprawling, private redevelopment project with 119 hotel rooms, nine time-share condos, 16,500 square feet of shops and restaurants, and 243 parking spaces on three city blocks located toward the bottom of State Street. La Entrada, first proposed in the 1990s, secured its final approvals in 2001 but never got built because of financial challenges — some self-inflicted — afflicting its first two owners.
After exhausting all possible permit extensions, developers approached City Hall two years ago with major design revisions. City Administrator Jim Armstrong, exasperated that such potentially lucrative real estate had become a long-festering blight, insisted on a sequential series of strict construction deadlines in exchange for his approval. But just last week, agents of developer Michael Rosenfeld — who bought the massive project last January for nearly $8 million — submitted a written request asking that Armstrong grant permission to reconfigure some of the larger parts of his jigsaw puzzle.
In addition, Rosenfeld asked that Armstrong suspend the deadline sequence requiring that parking and street improvements be built first and that hotel rooms and shops be built afterward. Rosenfeld’s land-use attorney Doug Fell argued the project would be “more economically viable” if Rosenfeld were allowed to build hotel rooms at the same time as the new parking lot. By proceeding simultaneously, he argued, the project could begin generating income much sooner than under the deal negotiated with Armstrong two years ago. Fell, it turned out, negotiated that deal, too.
Back then, one of Fell’s strongest pitches was that the developer — then Mountain Funding, a lending institution specializing in high-risk ventures and troubled developers — would dramatically expand the sweep and size of a public plaza, across the street from the Californian Hotel, that would open out onto State Street and invite passersby. But under the new plans, that public plaza would be reduced significantly in size, and it would no longer open to State Street at all but onto Mason Street instead.
Fell insisted this change was consistent with criticisms of the project leveled by the Historic Landmarks Committee, the members of which never embraced the big plaza. With shops facing State Street directly, Fell said the project would feel and function like the rest of State Street. And mountain views, he insisted, would be preserved under the proposed changes except from a small number of vantage points.
In addition, Rosenfeld has proposed moving all but eight of the parking spaces — both above ground and below — to the parcel across State Street from the Californian Hotel; previously they had been spread out on all three parcels. In addition, he wants to move all the hotel rooms to the Californian Hotel and an adjoining parcel where what’s left of Bebop Burgers still stands.
Procedurally, the redesign request is both awkward and unprecedented, involving so large a project so many years after the initial approvals were issued. Nor does it help that City Hall believes that previous developers played a strategic game of cat-and-mouse at the public’s expense, always promising construction was right around the corner but never doing more than the bare minimum needed to keep their permits alive. Rosenfeld — who spent $2 million this year on the surgical demolition of the Californian that left only the hotel facade standing — does not suffer from this reputation. In fact, this Monday, he pulled permits, at a cost of $50,000, to begin the sidewalk widening work on the west side of State Street.
By Paul Wellman
Californian Hotel façade



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
The dog and pony show continues vol 4
Casey and Armstrong should be fired.
easternpacific (anonymous profile)
October 4, 2012 at 12:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The next step will be a "forgiveness" of the bed tax for-oh-15 years or the development won't be competitive or pencil out. Then the city will try to come up with some other revenue source to make up the shortfall caused by giving up the bed tax-maybe something like increasing the cost of beachside parking. Sound familiar ?
pedronava (anonymous profile)
October 5, 2012 at 6 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let him do it right, if that's what it looks like he will do. he's no talker, he actually does things.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
October 8, 2012 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
One great thing about America is that occasionally one can even agree with Pedro Nava.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
October 8, 2012 at 6:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)