Now that the California Supreme Court has declined to hear Santa Barbara News-Press owner Wendy McCaw’s appeal, former editor Jerry Roberts plans to seek payment of what now amounts to about $1 million in attorney fees.
After Roberts resigned on July 6, 2006, McCaw filed a $25 million breach of contract arbitration action against him, and while the arbitrator did not award damages to either one, she said that Roberts could collect his legal fees.
The state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday after considering the appeal for a month, unexpectedly quickly. McCaw could now seek a review of the case by the U.S. Supreme Court. But because there are no apparent federal or constitutional issues, there’s only “a million-to-one chance” of the court accepting the case, according Herb Fox, appeals attorney for Roberts.
But because of McCaw’s history of appeals in other cases, she might go to the high court. “As far as we are concerned, the case is over,” Fox said. He said he will now proceed to “nicely” seek payment.
“This is a great day for journalism,” said Roberts. “Professionally, it’s extremely gratifying to receive this final vindication in a fight for journalistic ethics, alongside many colleagues who sacrificed jobs, careers, and more on behalf of principle.
“On a personal level,” he went on, “my family and I couldn’t be more pleased that California’s highest court, like every other trier of fact in the matter, found no merit in the baseless case brought against me.”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
sweet as bro. good for you.
wendy's going to pack a sad now. lol.
lawdy (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 11:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can't buy your way out of this one Wendy.
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 12:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think she'll appeal to the US Supreme Court, the International Court of Justice in the Hague, the floor of the UN General Assembly, and, of course, each of the Supreme Court, Judiciary Council, Tribunal of the United Federation of Planets.
sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 1:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The point of the appeals for Wendy is to stall and create misery for Mr. Roberts. She has so much money that it is of essentially no consequence how long this drags on for or how much she spends in legal fees. That is one of the problems with our legal system, money has an inordinate influence. Hopefully the supreme Court will quickly refuse to hear this case and that will be the end of a sad chapter in Santa Barbara journalism.
Noletaman (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 2:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Photo caption: The cat that just caught the canary...uhm, Macaw.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 3:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bahahaaaaa! Oh Wendy McCaw, how terrible it must be to realize that money doesn't mean omnipotence! She's enough of a loony bird to attempt to take it to the US Supreme Court though. That will be a good hearty rumbler of a laugh when she attempts that one! I feel bad for Roberts...what an unending stresser! She should also have to pay for the years she lopped off his life by all this undue stress she's caused him!
Gaijin (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 5:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
billclausen took the words right out of my mouth.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2012 at 6:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
WTG, Jerry!
Holly (anonymous profile)
May 11, 2012 at 12:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Score another one for the good guys.
Now, if we can only get the NP to stop littering my driveway with their 'Extra' which I never asked for.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
May 12, 2012 at 1:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wouldn't it be nice to be Wendy's attorney? You wouldn't need any other clients. Just like Larry Flynt's character in The People vs. Larry Flynt when his attorney tried to refuse to
defend him, he said, "I'm your best client, I'm rich and I'm always in trouble!"
buckwheat (anonymous profile)
May 13, 2012 at 10:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)