Developer Jack Theimer submitted plans last Friday with Carpinteria’s powers that be to build a four-star, two-story, 162-room resort hotel complete with restaurant, pool, spa amenities, and a 10,000-square-foot conference room on a 26-acre chunk of coastal bluff-top property known as Bluffs III. The land begins at the intersection of Highway 150 and Carpinteria Avenue and extends about 2,000 linear feet up the coast toward the City of Carpinteria.
In recent years, it’s been used almost exclusively by dirt-bike racers and four-wheelers. Up until 1956, it was the fabled site of a stock-car racing track popularly known as the Thunderbowl. But since 2003, with the adoption of Carpinteria’s General Plan, the land has been zoned for a resort hotel able to accommodate as many as 222 rooms. As such, it’s probably the only undeveloped parcel of coastal bluff-top land in California so zoned.
Theimer first eyeballed the site five years ago but began sizing it up in earnest only a year ago, acquiring an option to purchase from the land’s current owners, the Burton Hancock Trust. Theimer said he envisions a full-service hotel that would “occupy a market niche right below the Biltmore” in terms of room rates and amenities. Although the design is by no means finalized, Theimer said it will “lie quiet on the land” and that many of the rooms will feature solar power, vitamin-infused water, and other health-conscious and eco-friendly features.
Carpinteria has five hotels with a total of 586 rooms, and none are in the same league when it comes to luxury as the one Theimer envisions. He has proposed underground parking for hotel guests but two smaller ancillary lots — with a combined total of 38 spaces — that would be open to the public. In addition, he’s pledged to build a major stretch of coastal trail across his property, part of the City of Carpinteria’s long-simmering plan to build a coastal trail to the Rincon.
Theimer’s plans are preliminary and conceptual in nature, designed to gauge the relative degree of community support or opposition. They are slated to go before the city’s Architectural Review Board sometime in September and the City Council later in the fall. Based on what response he gets from city officials and the public, Theimer would then submit a formal application for review. To date, word of the resort has not seeped outside Carpinteria City Hall. For example, longtime community activist/watchdog Vera Benson — with the Carpinteria Valley Association — had no inkling it was in the works. When notified, she was less than enthusiastic. “Oh God,” she moaned. “How much more can we stand?”
Benson cited Carpinteria’s notorious rush-hour traffic woes and pointed out the construction of 74 homes now taking place across the freeway from Theimer’s proposed resort. Those homes, she said, were approved, in part, to mitigate the demand generated by an approved adjoining industrial park, but that park — because of the economy — has yet to break ground. Even so, Benson had praise for Theimer’s choice of architects — the firm of Neumann Mendro Andrulaitis, which is located in Carpinteria and has done considerable pro bono work on behalf of such community efforts as the much-heralded Arts Council. While Andy Neumann has never designed a resort hotel before, he has a solid grasp of what flies in Carpinteria and is respected. “You can always talk to Andy,” Benson said. But even so, she wondered whether such a project could be compatible with Carpinteria’s much-vaunted “small-town character,” called out for protection and preservation in the city’s General Plan.
It’s not the first time a developer set his sights on Bluffs III. Seven years ago, San Luis Obispo real estate mogul John King proposed a three-story hotel, surrounded by oceans of at-grade parking, complete with a wedding chapel and RV park. He, too, took advantage of the same “trial balloon” process Theimer is now pursuing, but according to his critics at City Hall, King made no concessions to popular resistance to his “kitchen sink” approach. Ultimately, when it appeared an endangered variant of the fairy shrimp had been found on the site, King stopped pursuing his plans.
Though the shrimp that seemed poised to bedevil King turned out to not be endangered at all, there is still no shortage of environmental concerns on Bluffs III. Two natural fault lines — defined as “potentially active” — crisscross the land. There’s coastal sage scrub to worry about, as well as wetlands to protect. In response, Theimer said, he’s proposing only 162 rooms, as opposed to the 222 maximum allowed, and is building on only six of the 22 acres he controls. He will not be seeking to build anything above the city’s 30-foot height maximum, and he said it’s possible his plans might come in at 25 feet high, depending on the pitch of the roof.
When asked if he would seek a moratorium on bed-tax revenues — as Miramar developer Rick Caruso has sought — Theimer responded, “Absolutely not.” With Carpinteria feeling the fiscal crunch, the bed-tax revenues from an upscale project like Theimer’s has to look very attractive. In fact, Carpinteria voters will be asked this November if they want bed taxes on their visitors increased from 10 percent to 12. City Manager Dave Durflinger said he’s seen no figures yet as to how much money Carpinteria stood to make in bed-tax revenues should Theimer’s hotel be approved. But he did add, “The number is clearly very significant.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
NO !
geeber (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 4:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's time to retire Jack - leave SB and Carp alone.
reality_check (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
NFW. the only structure i'm keen on along there is the hot dog guy's umbrella.
lawdy (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 8:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
That must be the big dirt area just east of Clipper Windpower at the end of Carp Ave. It has magnificent ocean views and is popular with paragliders. Lots of fossils from the Pleistocene epoch in that area too.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2012 at 2:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Priceless (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 7:15 a.m.
It's already zones for development. Can't some of you try reality every once in a while?
BeachFan (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 10:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
162 rooms for now.. What developer wouldn't use the max number of allowed rooms? Doesn't make sense.
local_sb (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Carpinteria SHOULD have an upscale hotel and Jack will certainly do a fine job of making it luxe AND fit in.
He works with the community on his projects and listens!
thunder (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another Carpinteria scam! The homeowners at Rincon just paid $80,000.00 each to pay for the sewer connection that the 4 star hotel gets for free.
Rinconer (anonymous profile)
July 27, 2012 at 8:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jack is local, and he did a good job with the Las Entradas development in Montecito some years ago. I hope Carp voters do raise the bed tax rate, and let's get Theimer to cut his rooms to 60 or so and see if that flies. Best of all: LEAVE IT ALONE!
DrDan (anonymous profile)
July 28, 2012 at 9:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
1>No sitting on the sidewalk. Don't smoke in public. No plastic bags at the food market. A view of the new hotel from the paraglider launch.
2>It's okay to sit on the sidewalk. Sure you can smoke outside. Get your groceries bagged in reuseable plastic at Albertson's. A view of natural growth and foliage from the paraglider launch.
List #2 is normal in my view. List #1 is a result of the complaints of the few. Isn't the tax revenue from the current oil developments enough?
hope11 (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2012 at 5:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmmm. Zoned for a resort hotel since 2003, but now that someone actually wants to build one - just hear the objectionista howl...I guess zoning only works when it favors the BANANA crowd.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2012 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The fossils might damn the project, but he's had the proper permits for years. Hate to see that piece get developed but he isn't asking for any special favors unlike some people.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
July 29, 2012 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mother nature will reclaim the land after man has gone. until then man and his doings continue.
everyone wants power but no power plant.
everyone wants to live in a house in a certain area but doesn't wish to share land that surrounds them with persons from out of the area.
man is a territorial creature, he wants to build a nest and sleep in it. he guards this nest any way he can.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2012 at 6:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bummer..
Byrd (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2012 at 8:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It is private property, zoned for development. Why not work with the developer to design something beautiful that will benefit all stakeholders and improve the use of that land? The land currently has ugly KEEP OFF signs. Merry mirth makers happily ignore these warnings and dump their empty 40 ouncers. Don't let a good opportunity to increase tax revenues, improve beach access and trails, and beautify our city slip away. If it doesn't happen now, it will someday. Politicians are easily purchased and you may not be happy with the results.
cato (anonymous profile)
October 16, 2012 at 5:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)