Dog Got Your Tongue?
Bad Facts May Make for Bad Law …
Thursday, December 20, 2012
LOCK, STOCK, AND BARREL: In the gun trade, it turns out, the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle — the weapon of choice among disturbed young white guys who’ve come to regard suicide as a mass event — is known as the “Barbie Doll.” The gun’s potential to be accessorized, it seems, is near infinite. “Bling potential,” they call it. Depending on the occasion, the AR-15 can be equipped with a bayonet, a grenade launcher, or a new customized grip. To maintain the element of surprise during nighttime use, a “flash suppressor” can be screwed to the rifle’s barrel to eliminate tell-tale red flames that would otherwise issue forth. Pink models are even available for shooters intent on demonstrating their solidarity with breast-cancer survivors while blasting away at targets laced with chemicals that make the bull’s-eye explode — with great gratifying volume — upon impact. Thanks to Adam Lanza and his pray-and-spray killing spree last week, there will be a lot fewer Barbies under America’s Christmas trees this year. What Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Arizona, and Aurora, Colorado, couldn’t do, Newtown, Connecticut, seemingly has. Our numb-dumb wall of almost zen paralysis has finally been breached. Even in a land where 20 mass shootings a year — the average since 1980 — are written off as the price of doing business, our hibernating capacity for outrage just got woken up. You can’t kill 20 1 st-grade kids in an affluent community and expect that nothing will be done. The question, of course, is what? Bad facts, the scolds famously tell us, make for bad law. But sometimes that’s the best you can do. Certainly in Newtown, all facts — such as they are — appear bad. Nancy Lanza — the shooter’s mom — was an avid gun collector; all her weapons appear to have been legally obtained and registered. Her son was disturbed far beyond what his autism diagnosis would indicate, and by all accounts, she was a devoted parent. With alimony payments of around $300,000 a year, Lanza’s mom could afford to get her son mental-health treatment; initial accounts indicate he’d been prescribed some medication. If Nancy Lanza qualified as a “helicopter mom,” she would become Black Hawk Down. She and her son visited shooting ranges together. She may have also been a “prepper,” a term to describe those preparing for the economic collapse of Western civilization. It remains unclear what triggered her son’s eventual collapse, but Nancy Lanza would be his first victim.
Angry Poodle
The quick solution, of course, is tougher laws and more restrictive gun-ownership rules. That makes obvious sense. Gun ownership is protected in the constitution, but I missed the passage endowing us with an inalienable right to purchase ammo clips containing 30 armor-piercing bullets. Equally obvious is the need to mandate rigorous background checks on gun buyers and new laws requiring that firearms come equipped with the micro-stamping technology that marks the gun’s make and serial number on all cartridges fired. The National Rifle Association’s (NRA) days may not be numbered, but they just got a whole lot shorter, as has our collective tolerance for that organization’s obscenely self-serving mantra: “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The same day Adam Lanza went calmly berserk, a 36-year-old Chinese man armed only with a knife attacked a school in his village, slashing 22 preteen students and one elderly woman. He was upset the world might end this Friday because that’s when the ancient Maya calendar ran out of dates. Bottom line? Twenty-three victims, zero fatalities. No gun.
Even so, the gun nuts make some powerful points. With more than 3.8 million semiautomatics already in circulation, it may be a little late to get the horses back in the proverbial barn. By all means, pass a ban. But don’t pretend the problem is solved. Of the 12,664 people killed by guns last year, semiautomatic accounted for 323. That’s more than all the combined gun deaths a year in Switzerland — the most heavily armed nation (per capita) and one of the most peaceful nations on the planet. But it still leaves 12,300 handgun deaths unaccounted for. Most occur in heavily urbanized areas, in the South, and involve nonwhites. Blacks and Hispanics, it turns out, are five times more prone to be killed in a gun-related homicide than whites. By contrast, 80 percent of white gun deaths are self-inflicted. Who knew?
The hardest nut to crack, of course, is mental health care. It’s also the most impossible. Ignoring it hasn’t helped. Nor has cutting funding. The breadth of need is vast, and effective treatment — even on a good day — is still a crapshoot. Civil libertarians object to criminal-profiling the mentally ill or a return to the good old days of psych-ward gulags. And they are absolutely right to do so. But for parents coping with the flamboyant self-destruction wrought by their out-of-control teens, the options range from null to nil. In Santa Barbara, you can park people who pose a danger to themselves or others in a county-run psychiatric facility that has six beds, or in Ventura’s Vista del Mar facility for a three-day involuntary hold. But that’s parking, not treatment. The other option, of course, is County Jail. Thus far, our grand jury has been decidedly unimpressed with the care provided the mentally ill warehoused there. And once you’re there, you’re criminally profiled. What’s needed is some sort of in-between holding/treatment space. That infrastructure does not exist. Funding for it does not exist. Worse yet, it hasn’t even been imagined. To date, the only people to try can be — and usually are — dismissed as self-appointed crackpots looking for a long rope to piss up on a windy day.
In the short term, the good news is that teachers are getting revenge for the school shooting. The managers of teacher pension funds — vast pools of investment capital — are threatening to pull their money from companies making the sort of weapons Adam Lanza used last week. Stock in these companies is dropping. And sporting-goods stores that used to prominently display such weapons are now thinking twice. In the meantime, have a great Christmas. Here’s hoping the only Barbie Dolls under the tree don’t come equipped with a trigger.
Related Links
Comments
Is anyone who enjoys target shooting a gun nut in your book, Nicky?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 5:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Is anyone who posts moronic comments a moron?
dontoasthecoast (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If one doesn't know the difference between a target/hunting rifle and a (semi) automatic assault rifle has no business owning either.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 8:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
when a japanese general from world war 2 was asked why they never tried to invade the US, he replied that they "knew" every US citizen was armed and proficient with rifles, and that any attackers would be slaughtered in an invasion attempt.
this is a true story, and the real reason why Americans should keep arms and be proficient.
Our Armed citizenry comprise the largest armed group in the world,(Over 100 million) and any invaders should think twice. Disarm them and we are sitting ducks.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 4:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
GM: Totally bogus "quote."
See among other sources:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/misq...
zappa (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'd also like to point out that defending our country with bolt action rifles (in an unscheduled invasion) would be much harder than with the modern semi auto rifles. I should also point out that guns kill far fewer people than Alcohol,Tobacco use or Automobiles, yet anyone can partake in their use. even sugar (diabetes,obesity) is dangerous and certainly kills many more people than guns.
Of course the mentally ill should never have guns, and we already have laws that specify this.
Any shootings are a serious tragedy, but so are the deaths of so many from all the other preventable causes, just that they are less dramatic and therefore rarely make much news coverage.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
so "zappa" because you can't prove that Prange heard this from a Japanese general, that it is not true? poppycock to you.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Zappa, your link does seem very weak if anything. what do they know really? just that "they" don't have proof.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I just found 27,800,000 web results(google) to "why the japanese did not invade the US in world war 2" and every one of them supports my use of the quote (however misquoted) that I used. you have one link. Please look for yourself before you insult the twenty seven million web pages that favor what I said.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Even if Yamamoto did not say this,AND we may never really know,He SHOULD have, and it rings true, AND The US has more armed citizens than any other country. that is most certainly true. the point is our armed citizenry does present quite a challenge to any potential invaders. now tell me mr"zappa" if you feel this is untrue. actually don't bother, the facts are universally supported
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 5:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As for the Japanese not invading, I'll steal the line from Lenny Bruce vis-a-vis why the Russians wouldn't invade us: "Where are they going to park"?
As for Nick's obssession about race let me try to help. One of the manifestations of white Progressive Postmodern think is smaller families and more divorce. As a result, the "Lone Wolf" syndrome results. Communal, stable upbringingins tend to produce more socialized people. So don't worry Nick, it isn't genetic, and you can take comfort in the fact that most of the Blacks and Hispanics that are killed are killed by people of their own race, and much of that too, can be traced to the re-education of our society.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 8:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A fatuous comment at best:
:: billclausen says:
"[Nick] you can take comfort in the fact that most of the Blacks and Hispanics that are killed are killed by people of their own race..."
- - -
Victim and and killer are overwhelmingly the same race, black or white (Hispanics are usually classified as white), well over 80%.
And today's murder rates have fallen drastically after reaching a high in the '80s, to levels not seen since Don Draper's heyday.
:: "Long term trends and patterns In the last decade (since 2000) the homicide rate declined to levels last seen in the mid-1960s.
" - The homicide rate doubled from the early 1960s to the late 1970s, increasing from 4.6 per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1962 to 9.7 per 100,000 by 1979.
" - In 1980 the rate peaked at 10.2 per 100,000 and subsequently fell to 7.9 per 100,000 in 1984.
" - The rate rose again in the late 1980s and early 1990s to another peak in 1991 of 9.8 per 100,000.
" - The homicide rate declined sharply from 9.3 homicides per 100,000 in 1992 to 4.8 homicides per 100,000 in 2010.
:: "The number of homicides reached an all-time high of 24,703 homicides in 1991 then fell rapidly to 15,522 homicides by 1999.
" - The number of homicides increased steadily from the early 1950s until the mid-1970s
" - Between 1999 and 2008, the number of homicides remained relatively constant, ranging from a low of 15,552 homicides in 1999 to a high of 17,030 homicides in 2006. These homicide numbers were still below those reported in the 1970s, when the number of reported homicides first rose above 20,000 (reaching
20,710 in 1974)."
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/...
[DOJ PDF]
binky (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 9:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Binky, could you please repeat that?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 1:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, "GluteousMaximus," you got me. My apologies for my "insult" to over 27 million webpages! I tried to check them all, but grew tired after viewing only three so my hat's off to you and your amazing research and efforts.
And of course you're right: If someone "should have" said something and if it "rings true," well, that's just more ironclad proof of the factual basis of any argument and clearly indicates that said argument is "universally supported." Yep, you win. Thanks for straightening all that out for me and showing me the light.
zappa (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 4:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How Mr or Mrs "Zappa" did this quote even come into existence if no one said it. that said, you are a smug little corrector type, showing us all how little you really know about people and life in general with your desire to show everyone up because you feel inferior and must make amends. I do feel sorry for the people you interact with on a daily basis, they must pity you. you make your own bed and now you must sleep in it. 27.8 million to 1.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 7:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
By the way, of course I am a complete ass...why else would I choose a screen name like GluteousMaximus?
No one is perfect, and I for one am certainly not.
And I see no good reason in pretending to be.
Happy Holidays to all.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 8:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr./Mrs./Ms. "GM," All kidding aside, you do understand that the number of "results" obtained via a Google search of a name, term etc., has nothing to do with any validity, accuracy or truth, right?
If you type something like "Mayan Calendar end-of-world," you'll get 484,000,000 "results." Last I checked, it didn't happen.
It's easy to toss around "facts" and "quotes" on the Internet and to find "support" for any topic or create supposed evidence for apocryphal stories (which is what the Yamamoto "quote" is) and pass that sort of thing off as research. It's a real problem in our increasingly dumbed-down society and one I tried to address civilly in my first response. Maybe examine your own hostile and smug tone here and decide who really needs to "make amends," another term whose actual meaning seems to have eluded you. Over and out.
zappa (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 8:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"zappa" wins by a factor of 2.7 x 10⑥
“I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect.” -- Oscar Wilde
binky (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Guns don't kill people, ping pong does. At least in Texas?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/te...
Someone deserves a good paddling.
hodgmo (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 9:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nick,
You finally hit the nail on the head; it took a few paragraphs but you got it.
The tragic event in CT was not as much about guns as it was about mental health.
All of the weapons used by Adam were purchased legally. But perhaps his mother did not exercise responsibility in properly securing those weapons.
I would highly recommend that all weapons be locked up by the responsible party to preclude a minor from accessing them; it would seem to me that common sense should also dictate this in a case where there is a mentally unstable person on the premises. If I understand correctly, this is the law here in CA. But, like so many laws, people don't always abide by the law, nor exercise common sense. Still, this is no reason to penalize and/or encumber those who are responsible and law abiding.
dionysiuspetros (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 9:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
...OBTW: in none of the incidents referenced (...Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Arizona, and Aurora, Colorado, couldn’t do, Newtown, Connecticut...) was an AR-15 used.
You were close in Aurora, CO; there was a S&W version of the same weapon.
dionysiuspetros (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 9:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
hodgmo, great ping pong in TX ref., that gun nut also is against laws requiring guns to be locked up in the home because "then the criminals know they are all locked up". Sure, mental health is an issue, it always is, but much more stringet gun control laws are a necessity.
Now the NRA wants an armed guard in every school -- how intelligent and thoughtful. Oh yeah, it will help in gun sales, I get it.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 11:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You cannot attack America, there you will find a rifle behind every blade of grass.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 1:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
When GluteousMaximus was asked why the Polynesians did not invade the United States, he replied:
You cannot invade the United States. There you will find a Japanese behind every lazy ass.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 1:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are parts of Isla Vista that not even the Nazis could contain.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There are parts of Isla Vista that not even the Nazis could contain.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 2 p.m.
Where would they find room to park?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We need to ban all guns - after all, isn't it time for cartels to get out of the drug business and focus on a new industry? Gun laws have gotten much too oppressive.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 9:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If more weapons equals less violence, why can't Iran have a nuke?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 23, 2012 at 12:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
hmmm - I'm hoping none of the commentators here own any weapons.
ramey (anonymous profile)
December 23, 2012 at 10:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
there's a silver lining...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIoBro...
hodgmo (anonymous profile)
December 23, 2012 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@dionysiuspetros
"OBTW: in none of the incidents referenced (...Columbine, Virginia Tech, Tucson, Arizona, and Aurora, Colorado, couldn’t do, Newtown, Connecticut...) was an AR-15 used."
The Sandy Hook shooting in CT used a "Bushmaster" version of the AR-15, but I get what you're trying to say. However, I don't think the Poodle meant to directly tie the other incidents to the weapon, as much as the deed (of a shooting/massacre).
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
January 4, 2013 at 11:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Get rid of assault weapons? Let's start with Santa Barbara Motorcycle Officers who seem to revel in strapping their AR-15s to their bikes.
But of course, it takes that kind of firepower to impound cars all day, doesn't it?
Beachgirl77 (anonymous profile)
January 4, 2013 at 10:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)