Of the 115 townhouses built by Cottage Health System at the former site of St. Francis Hospital, all but one or two have been sold, occupied, or are in escrow. Eighty-one were sold at below-market rates to Cottage employees as part of a corporate subsidy program designed to attract and retain employees. Of what Cottage is now calling its 81 “professional” units — formerly known as “workforce” housing — 25 were purchased by Cottage RNs, 26 by clinical staff, 21 by nonclinical staff (employees performing administrative functions like fundraising rather than direct patient care), and nine by medical students completing their residency programs.
The professional units ranged in price from $187,000 for a one-bedroom to $475,000 for a three-bedroom. The average price was $242,000 for a two-bedroom unit. The maximum household income for employees qualifying for the program was $130,000 a year. The 34 market-rate units — dubbed “traditional” — were significantly larger and more expensive, ranging in price from $610,000 to $1 million. Cottage administrators estimate the housing project — named Bella Riviera — lost the health-care institution $15 million; that’s the gap between what it cost to build and revenues generated by sales.
Initially, 250 employees sought to purchase the 81 units. Not all qualified for financing; some concluded they could do better on the private market with its record-low interest rates and relatively low prices. The 81 units are bound by resale controls, meaning that the owners can only realize limited profits if and when they sell. Should a Cottage worker cease to be employed by Cottage for any reason — a typical residency lasts only five years, for example — they have six months in which to sell.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
Are the homeowner association dues and votes weighted differently between the low-cost professional units and the free market ones? I see the seeds of future dissent brewing.
Oblati (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 9:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They have to sell back to Cottage Corporation, and at a low price with no equity accumulated, so why are these even considered "bought" "sold" or "owned"?
It is just a game because rental housing is too plebian for the Cottage snootiness.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wait, they tore down a hospital to lose money building housing for another hospitals employees? I'm afraid I don't get it.
To me, having multiple hospitals is a good thing.
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 21, 2012 at 6:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If having multiple hospitals was such a good thing, why did St Francis go broke and have to be torn down?
Oblati (anonymous profile)
December 22, 2012 at 5:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't know the answer to that but having a choice usually beats being served by a monopoly. Competition is what helps keep prices lower and can anyone honestly say if it really "had to be torn down?" Did they "go broke" or was it planned that way by a management that operated like Bain Capital?
To tear down the buildings was a decision someone made based on their intentions for the land the structures occupied.
Seismic retrofits have kept many older structures Usable, the Granada Building, for example.
Did St.Francis "go broke" before or after being purchased by Cottage? Was it all a plan to make Cottage the one and only hospital?
I don't know the answer but I still think having choices in local healthcare is desirable.
How would it be if Santa Barbara Had only one Restaurant?
Car Dealer? Furniture Store? how popular would that scenario be?
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
December 24, 2012 at 3:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I've always been very happy with my experiences at Cottage but I do think the community was better served having two hospitals, regardless of who owned them. I'm sure the ER staff agree.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 24, 2012 at 3:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A physician does a residency - a medical student goes to medical school. The average residency at Cottage (internal medicine, radiology or surgery) is 4 years, not 5.
NatashaTheFeline (anonymous profile)
December 24, 2012 at 7:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hard to know where to begin to remedy the factual misstatementts in Gluteous post. Just ignore all of them is the better choice. Sorry but you really have all of your facts just plain wrong, but I can see they serve some sort of personal agenda. Whatever, carry on.
Oblati (anonymous profile)
December 27, 2012 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Then why bother posting a comment Oblati, just to see your name in lights on your monitor?
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 27, 2012 at 11:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There are probably more alternative health care choices in this town which people enjoy paying out of pocket than any other similar community.
There is competition in health care - look no further than the millions getting spent on medical marijuana in this town alone. All that money left the traditional health care market in this town and got diverted to the supplement sellers and the New Age practitioners this town prefers.
Follow the money in this town and see what health care it is willing to buy with their discretionary out of pocket dollars. No wonder it could not afford to support two traditional hospitals.
Oblati (anonymous profile)
December 27, 2012 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
To clarify, I hope: St Francis Hospital in Santa Barbara was no longer financially viable. Increased operating costs, decreased market share, and the final straw being the new government-mandated sesmic requirements: rebuild, refit, or shut-down. They chose to close, and then Cottage bought the abandoned facility (if I understood my sources correctly).
Like small independent farms, factories, etc, stand-alone hospitals are increasingly bought out or closed down. It's just not as financially viable. The rehabilitation hospital, Goleta Valley, and Santa Ynez hospitals all are still operating as they are because they merged with / were bought by Cottage. If they hadn't, they would either have closed or been bought by some out-of-town corporate hospital system.
Sothep (anonymous profile)
December 28, 2012 at 12:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
GlutMax poses interesting comments obliging some of us to think about his/her questions and thoughts...thanks! Surely, having choices in commerce is better than monopoly... T. Roosevelt and many have thought so. When Oblati blunders on and hammer's GlutMax's QUESTIONS as "factual misstatements" [sic] and commands the rest of us poor dumb posters to "ignore" them... then follow KV in wondering why O posts at all? It's the same in every shot s/he takes, whether taking down public pensions or ranting against Prop 30... humbug.
Sothep has some points, but I still think multiple locations for major medical emergencies, e.g. a big earthquake, is safer for the whole community.
DrDan (anonymous profile)
December 28, 2012 at 6:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)