Santa Barbara City Hall’s four heaviest hitters went to Sacramento this week to make their case that the city should be allowed to retain ownership of and control over 15 downtown parking lots and garages that were built with Redevelopment Agency funding. Making the trip north to argue that city-owned lots constitute a “legitimate government function” were Mayor Helene Schneider, City Administrator Jim Armstrong, City Attorney Steve Wiley, and Community Development Director Paul Casey. Unless state Department of Finance administrators agree, City Hall could find itself ordered to sell its lots as part of the state-ordered dissolution of all Redevelopment Agencies — and disbursement of all their assets — throughout the state. “The worst-case scenario is we’re forced to sell our lots, we lose the first 75 minutes of free parking, all the lots are operated differently, shoppers have to pay higher rates, and pretty soon you have tsunamis, locusts, and floods,” said Casey.
Since the 1960s, the City of Santa Barbara has sought to provide cheap and easily available parking to encourage shoppers to come downtown and keep the central business district economically healthy. Since the 1970s, the city’s Redevelopment Agency spent millions to that end as part of a sustained effort lasting 40 years. After that agency was forced to dissolve earlier this year — as part of the legislative response to California’s ongoing budget crisis — the city sought to transfer the parking lots to City Hall itself.
First, the Department of Finance sought legislation to stop the transfer, but when that was successfully rebuffed, the finance department asserted itself administratively to prevent City Hall from taking title to the parking lots. (Efforts to transfer the railway depot have likewise been blocked.) Wiley said the state’s objections have “no basis” and are “nonsense.” Should the Santa Barbara delegation prove insufficiently persuasive, Casey said a lawsuit was likely. “I don’t want to be premature, but we will not take no for an answer.” Neither Casey nor Wiley said they knew when the Department of Finance would render a decision.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
I thought the four Heavy Hitters of City Hall were the 4 of 7 council members who cast the majority vote any Tuesday.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 7:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How much of the RDA money actually is now going to the schools? Das Williams pushed hard to have the city/cities stripped of their RDA, http://www.independent.com/news/2011/..., but now says he's "hopeful" that Santa Barbara will be able to keep its parking lots! It would have been preferable had these details been thought out beforehand by our legislator, all the legislators leaping on Brown's bandwagon.
at_large (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I like Casey's comment. “The worst-case scenario is we’re forced to sell our lots, we lose the first 75 minutes of free parking, all the lots are operated differently, shoppers have to pay higher rates, and pretty soon you have tsunamis, locusts, and floods,” It shows exactly how ridiculous it is for the city to fight what has already been decided. Sell the lots and move on to other more pressing matters.
MSSB (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 4:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The State needs to focus on more important issues than robbing SB of it's parking lots and then stealing the money. Lost of those lots have been city operated and owned for decades.
And free parking needs to be reinstated to 90 minutes.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 4:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Raise your hands if you think those car parking lots would be operated as nicely, courteously, effectively, and cheaply if a private corporation were operating them, with prices as high as they believed the market would bear and with any employes as desperate and as illiterate as the minimum wage could provide.
And bonuses for everyone on a nearby street who thinks those private lots would not shunt car parking onto the public streets instead.
John_Adams (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 6:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'd love to shop at your store but Acme Parking Inc took all my money"
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2012 at 6:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)