The 6,600-gallon sewage spill that closed Leadbetter Beach last week (since-reopened) touched off a renewed war of words between clean-water advocate Kira Redmond of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper and Rebecca Bjork, City Hall’s water czar. At a testy showdown in City Council chambers, Redmond charged City Hall has violated the letter and spirit of the settlement arrived at earlier this year of a federal Clean Water Act lawsuit filed by Channelkeeper two years ago.
According to that agreement, Redmond charged, City Hall would be allowed no more than 18 spills in 2012; the Leadbetter spill, she noted, was the 19th this year. Likewise, she charged, City Hall committed to replacing an additional two miles of sewer pipe a year or spend $900,000 trying for five consecutive years. To date, she said, only 0.64 miles of pipe have been replaced this year and only $478,000 has been spent. Redmond complained that she’d been given only three days’ notice that Bjork planned to brief the City Council, accusing city staff of “perpetuating the pattern of uncooperative communication.”
City Attorney Steve Wiley insisted City Hall was living up to its agreement with Channelkeeper, and Bjork outlined an ambitious laundry list of changes her department had undertaken — or planned to initiate — to ensure that raw sewage doesn’t escape from broken sewer pipes and then seep into the city’s storm drain system. Her department, Bjork said, cleaned out 114 miles of the city’s 257 miles of sewer pipe last year and repaired four miles of vulnerable pipe. The council heard how pipe repair, rather than replacement, was a cheaper, more effective way to prevent sewage incidents. Bjork said tree roots were responsible for half this year’s spills and noted that tree roots from privately owned sewer laterals contributed to last week’s backup at Leadbetter Beach. Three years ago, she said, City Hall was averaging 40 spills a year; now it’s half that.
Much council discussion focused on the extent to which the 24,000 privately owned sewer laterals feeding into the city system contributed to the problem. Hilary Hauser of Heal the Ocean suggested the State Legislature might pass a bill requiring sewer laterals to be inspected as a condition of home sale, an idea bitterly opposed in the past by real estate brokers. For several years, City Hall offered property owners a rebate for inspection and replacement costs but stopped the $900,000-a-year program due to budget constraints. The program, said Councilmember Bendy White, was “porky” because area plumbers jacked up their rates and urged work that didn’t need to be done.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
19 raw sewage spills right into the channel that cause measurable increases in fecal coliform and even beach closures... no big deal according to Santa Barbarans.
Floatopia... no measureable increase in fecal coliform... environmental disaster according to Santa Barbarans... cause for restrictions of beach access enforced by the County Sheriff.
pardallchewinggumspot (anonymous profile)
December 13, 2012 at 11:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The most reasonable solution to this problem is for people to stop pooping.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
December 13, 2012 at 6:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mayor Schneider stated that she wanted to defer maintenance and concentrate on city capital projects over a month ago. If the city of Santa Barbara had ever agreed to the letter and spirit of the settlement, that agreement was limited to posturing during settlement of the litigation. The city's press releases and the insert in the July utilities bill made it clear that the city doesn't function as local government in acknowledging and enforcing laws and providing services to residents, and accepts no responsibility for polluting the ocean and endangering residents and tourists by exposing them to fecal coliform at local beaches.
The same day that Santa Barbara city council voted to increase water and sewer rates for residents by the maximum amount allowed under California law, they voted on the consent calendar to give unrepresented managers a 2 1/2% raise and to defer furloughs, a salary increase that was mentioned as deferred in the 2011 mid-year financial report by city administrator Jim Armstrong. The managers include Steve Wiley and assistant police chiefs earning over $200K.
The city's charges for water meters are also in violation of California law, which allows billing only for the actual costs incurred - the cost of the meter, installation, and meter reading. SB city council voted on the consent calendar last December to ban private water meters, which are usually well under $200. Public works also has no program for sewer flow monitoring, contrary to SB Public Works rep. Christine Anderson's statement, so if most water is used for irrigation, city billing for sewer use is an enormous overcharge. Utilities are a separate business from government, and billing is supposed to be based on cost, with water supply and sewer service operating on a break-even basis. SB city is paying contractors to train city public works employees in inspecting and cleaning sewer mains since the Channelkeepers settlement, and has had a program for several years to inspect laterals and to install backflow valves to prevent the type of spill that closed Leadbetter. I've had this done, a requirement for a building permit, but Bendy White's comment is the first I've heard re overcharging by plumbers. I'd sure like to see an external audit of SB city sewer and water accounts, since I live in a city that doesn't acknowledge responsibility for compliance with federal law and is dishonest when confronted with violations.
14noscams (anonymous profile)
December 15, 2012 at 8:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)