Indecent Exposure
Today’s Kids Born to Porn
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I hate things that make me sound like I’m 90 years old. And that’s what online porn is doing. Beckoning our teenagers from their laptops, iPhones, and tablets, X-rated Web sites are causing me to curse technology and pine for the good old days when smut knew its place: on the pages of a shrink-wrapped girlie magazine on the periodicals shelf of your neighborhood 7-Eleven.
Back in my day, we pored over dog-eared Playboys, passed around Penthouse letters, and stared agog at warbly VHS tapes of Deep Throat — all lifted from our parents’ stash. Or our friends’ parents’ stash. Or our parents’ friends’ stash.
Starshine Roshell
We had to work hard to see porn, and I’m not complaining; we had quite the work ethic. But today’s teens have to work hard not to see it. It’s free, it’s abundant, and it’s a single click away. Most of it is explicit, and much of it (what? I conducted a study) is so in-your-face graphic that you have to wonder if it’s intended to turn off the viewer.
Our teens — and, in some cases, ick, our preteens — are looking at this stuff. It’s not a question of if or when. They. Are. Looking. And how can you blame them? It’s a fascinating alien world. A big-box toy store. A freshly stocked cookie jar. I think it’s healthy for teens to explore their sexuality, and at least on-screen you can’t catch anything. Or create anyone.
But here’s my beef with porn: It’s not real sex. It doesn’t look or sound anything like intercourse between consenting human adults. And it’s not supposed to depict real sex, because it’s made to entertain adults who know better — the way action movies are stupidly entertaining or fast-food burgers are crazy-delicious but, if consumed in large quantities, will mess you up.
For young people who lack personal points of reference, porn can only skew their notions of sexuality and intimacy. Have you seen this stuff? How can it not launch kids onto their own sexual journeys believing that “safe sex” is a figment of their health teacher’s imagination, and that all women are hairless, spherical-breasted nymphos who make cool death-wail noises when you tug their pigtails?
“What do teens learn from porn?” says Sam Black, an Internet safety expert. “More partners are better. Stable relationships must be boring. Novelty provides greater satisfaction. Over time the brain that feeds on erotic media is trained to equate sexual excitement with the novelty and variety of pornography.”
Add what we know about the compulsive properties of porn, and the fact that many sex offenders were exposed to it at an early age — and I’m 90 again, ranting that the Internet is a plague on human decency and that Google is Satan’s search engine.
But clinical psychologist Nancy Irwin assures me that peeking at porn won’t topple our society — or corrupt our kids.
“If the child has already learned the basics of sex, has reached puberty, and if the sexual partners are treating each other with respect and sensuality and fun, it might be okay,” says Irwin, who has worked with both sex offenders and sex addicts. If you discover your kid’s been watching it, don’t react with shame, she says. “This is the time to ask what their feelings and questions are about sex and porn. Take this time to share your own beliefs. Empower the child to make his or her own choice about it.”
Back in my day, the birds-and-bees talk didn’t include the words “fetish” or “bondage,” but today’s parents have no choice. If we can spark an honest dialogue about a subject that for generations has been secretly, silently stowed between the mattress and the box spring, then maybe our kids have a shot at a normal, healthy sex life after all.
But they’d better stay out of my stash.
Related Links
Starshine Roshell is the author of Wife on the Edge.
Comments
Yawn.
ahem (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 12:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
More porn > less porn
And are you sure you're not 90?
bronc (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 1:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What about columnists whose articles are often about sex? Don't they contribute to the hypersexualization of society?
Seems a case of "do as I say, not as I do".
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 1:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with the Doctors regarding sexual knowledge of Teens, that dictates either your a sex-fiend or a prude. A child could view porn as interesting and fun or gross and disgusting which will dictate how they view sex and procreation as a whole. The point of sharing is to build diolog in proper and safe sexual practices and to leave behind falsehoods and violence (some porn uses violence as an engine for agressive sexual contact leading to rape).
Starshine does have it right regarding the assessablity of porn via the Internet and social assess sites, (facebook, my space, tweet and blogs), though.
dou4now (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 8:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oooh, and what about commenters whose comments are about sex? Don't they contribute to the sexifying of the comments sextion?
TheAverageMan (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree that it's a problem and if you have teens, and especially teen girls, you're certainly aware of it and the ill effects of 24/7 porn access. All a part of the continuing vulgarization/skankification of society in general. One of the sad effects that I've also noted is that teen boys in particular sometimes seem to take their notions of sex/sexuality and how one treats girls/women from what they see in the XXX world online. These are , by-and-large, not exactly healthy examples.
Rap "music" is another source of these negative stereotypes that are constantly bombarding kids today.
I also have to take note of the point raised by Bill C: People in the media, including this columnist whose witty writing I often enjoy, do need to be aware to their own role in promoting the hypersexualization of _everything._ No, I'm not 90 either and don't consider myself a prude, an old foggy or any of the other meant-to-be insulting tags that may follow.
zappa (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 2:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What I would caution against is the trend to want society to take on issues that concern us. Many parents want the "Nanny State" approach, while failing to see that they themselves contribute to the problem that concerns them.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 4:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, zappa--rap "music"--really? You really think we'd have a sexually pristine culture had not rap "music" emerged?
What about HBO, Cinemax, etc. etc.?
The fact that you put music in quotes narrows your category substantially.
ahem (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2012 at 10:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ahem: Did you not read Zappa's post? Zappa made it very clear prior to his/her's comment about rap that there were other factors contributing to the problem.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2012 at 2:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As a parent, I also found it depressing, sad, that my two boys were exposed to hardcore porn way before I think they were prepared to see it, and worried that it imprinted them in unhealthy ways. (Neighbor kid's house was earliest exposure.) It colors one's thoughts, and probably feelings, about the subject, and helps shape them. There must be an upside to the whole sordid situation, but I don't know what it is.
ChrisG (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2012 at 5:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, billclausen, but specifying rap music is like pointing out sickle cell anemia among causes of death in America. Sure, it happens, but does it really merit a community alert in santa barbara?
ahem (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2012 at 11:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Isn't it ironic that Frank Zappa and Tipper Gore were going at it back in the 80's over the issue of obscene music lyrics (Zappa saying it was no big deal and Gore saying it was) and we have a blogger named "zappa" here? Is it Frank back from the dead? That would really be something if it were.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2012 at 2:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
OK, I try to make it a point not to respond to these things, because you know how these "Internet arguments" go, but...
The rap/sickle cell analogy is patently ludicrous and seems to be pressing a "point" that surely I didn't make.
Nope, I'm not a fan of this genre, but to each his/her own and all that.
I was (simply?) stating my opinion (one I believe that's shared by others) that rap music (there I removed the quotes), at least much of it, including what I'm say to day I've heard from my own teens' playlists contains offensively misogynistic and dehumanizing content, much like......porn. How does that in any way represent a "community alert" or is deserving of any overheated response? Is that clearer, maybe, such as it matters?
@ 5D: Nope, not FZ resurrected or anything like that. I admired his stance on censorship, but wasn't all that much of a fan of _his_ music either although it certainly was innovative for its time. Did like the cover of the old LP "Weasels Ripped My Flesh," though and, like Frank, am partly a figlio di Sicilia by descent.
zappa (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2012 at 10:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Starshine, I honestly wouldn't worry about it too much. I grew up with it in the mid-90s, and used it nearly every day for the last 15 years. Now I have a gf of 6 months and have no desire to go back to it, unless she's gone for a while.
As crazy as all that stuff looks, most guys use it for clinical purposes and are able to eventually titrate their sessions and explore and direct the type of content to a comfortable level for them without becoming addicted.
The key is to have other interests and activities to be involved in. I would only be worried about it if it becomes a significant part of their lives, and even then, it may just be a high libido combined with lack of recent intimate experiences that needs to be worked out not unlike a knot in your neck.
loonpt (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2012 at 10:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, billclausen, but specifying rap music is like pointing out sickle cell anemia among causes of death in America. Sure, it happens, but does it really merit a community alert in santa barbara?
ahem (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2012 at 11:01 p.m
A community alert as in "run for you lives"?...no, but I do think people need to recognize that much of it a celebration of gang life and the attendant violence therein, as well as hatred of women. Of course well-meaning White Leftists don't dare criticize it for fear of being labeled racist, while failing to see their own racism by their assumption that gansta rap speaks for Black culture.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, you can criticize me for terminology but have no self-critique for the blind use of a genre reference that is hardly germane to the article.
ahem (anonymous profile)
April 29, 2012 at 8:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I've been accused of being a pornographer in these very pages!
When i was in Jr. High and HS, I thought Penthouse Forum was the guide to adult life. It was mostly stories and letters, PLUS interviews with cool people like Deborah Harry, Andy Warhol..
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 29, 2012 at 9:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Men appear in porn as well- and not always with women.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 30, 2012 at 4:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Men appear in porn as well- and not always with women."
Ken, those underwater scenes we did with those actors are a thing of the past. Why do you keep bringing this up? We couldn't get a starring role in "Flipper Goes To Hollywood" so short of being a display at Sea World we had to pay the rent somehow.
fivedolphins (anonymous profile)
May 1, 2012 at 1:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
On a more serious note, there seems to be considerable evidence of widespread porn-induced erectile dysfunction. Lots of men, even in their 20s, are having difficulty having intercourse with real women. While many of them won't talk about this -- many respond anonymously to surveys and blogs, finding some consolation they are not alone.
This is a downside of neuroplasticity. The brain changes by its conditioning. If we men get-off on "paper dolls", we may lose (fortunately reversible in many cases) our capacity to respond to flesh-and-blood women.
A slightly broader, but related, issue has to do with relationships, not merely sexual function. This is the 'air-brush' syndrome. A man becomes so used to magazine beauty that his 'standards' become too high. Every real available woman he knows is too fat or too ugly. He won't consent to any committed relationship.
See:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetec...
witwaltman (anonymous profile)
May 3, 2012 at 7:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'll add one more thing. A lot of young women are facing the fall-out of this. As the parent of one who may be considering marriage sometime in the next few years, it is depressing to think of this becoming her problem.
witwaltman (anonymous profile)
May 3, 2012 at 10:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Flipper Does Ft. Lauderdale
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
May 3, 2012 at 11:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
>>"Our teens — and, in some cases, ick, our preteens — are looking at this stuff. It’s not a question of if or when. They. Are. Looking.
Add what we know about the compulsive properties of porn, and the fact that many sex offenders were exposed to it at an early age ..."
OMG, THIS MEANS ALL OF OUR CHILDREN ARE GOING TO BE SEX OFFENDERS!
Dolomush (anonymous profile)
May 7, 2012 at 2:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Opening one's emailbox is at times like walking down Haley Street at night: hookers, drugs and thieves.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
May 7, 2012 at 3:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What is truly depressing is that Dolomush (formerly Etna/Kratatoa/Pinatubo...) has a non-volcanic handle. It appears the fire has gone out.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
May 14, 2012 at 6:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Shhhhhh! I'm undercover.
Dolomush (anonymous profile)
May 16, 2012 at 8:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)