Rick Caruso has fully paid off his loan on the Miramar Hotel and also paid a $1.4-million mitigation fee required by the California Coastal Commission, Caruso Affiliated announced in a press release this week. The move, Caruso said, reaffirms his company’s commitment to building the luxury hotel.
Indeed, since closing 12 years ago, the hotel has been sold twice as owners struggled to get a project going, and questions surrounding the future of the property have swirled since Caruso took it over. Tuesday’s announcement should quiet, at least for the moment, some of those rumors. “We are and will continue to be focused on the development and our long-term ownership of the Miramar Hotel property,” Caruso said in the statement.
Caruso owed on two promissory notes totaling $50 million. It is unclear what his payments have been on the loan since he took it over in 2007. The notes were originally held by Barclays Capital Real Estate Inc. and then assigned to Woodridge Capital Partners, LLC, which owns La Entrada, the long-neglected hotel project on lower State Street.
Caruso has told the county that a hotel incentive program would make his $170-million project — of which he expects to pay about $68 million — an easier pitch to lenders in a tough market. Under one proposed incentive program, the county would refund the bed tax on new, qualifying luxury hotels the first 10 years the hotel is in existence. For the Miramar, that would mean Caruso gets about $18 million over 10 years that would have gone to the county, according to estimates. Caruso said that loss would be offset by the increases in property tax and sales tax an open hotel would generate.
The County Board of Supervisors is expected to take up the hotel incentive program again in late spring or early summer.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
What? NO snarky comments about Caruso? Where are all the richguyhaters?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 12, 2012 at 5:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hate's no good.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 13, 2012 at 1 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They sure were out in force when he was trying to get the Miramar approved several years ago.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 13, 2012 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
That's different than him paying off a a loan on money he owes. I'm going to issue a press release every time I pay a bill now.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 13, 2012 at 11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the idea is that he's demonstrating that he intends to continue with the Miramar.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2012 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ken you are so right. Caruso has this county wrapped around his middle finger.....and once he gets his multi-million dollar gift of public funds---written into law!? he will show us all just what he has "intended" all along
whosecityisthis2012 (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2012 at 8:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
50 million for 20 acres with busy train tracks bisecting it.wtf?
the miramar only made business sense with it's existing buildings in place and very little other money spent.
How will this project ever pay for itself,let alone make a profit?
GluteousMaximus (anonymous profile)
April 14, 2012 at 11:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@whosecityisthis2012: Interesting question. Not yours or mine or anyone's alone that's for sure. And if you don't like what the Supes are doing, vote against them (chance to dump Salud is comin up).
@glueousMaximus: Ask the Biltmore - works for them, except for the bisecting part.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2012 at 9:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't think I trust Joni Gray to manage property! Whether you agree with her overall philosophy or not, Doreen Farr seems to me the only supe that has held true to principle and previous campaign promises despite the unnecessary turmoil Papas inflicted on her. BTW, has he paid any money back? His current campaign donations should be garnished.
Ken_Volok (anonymous profile)
April 15, 2012 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Locke:
The Biltmore was built years ago when construction (and permitting) was much cheaper. The Biltmore can command rates twice as high as the Miramar will. There's no comparison.
Lars (anonymous profile)
April 16, 2012 at 5:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good point, but the Biltmore recently underwent a rather large upgrade followed by an increase in prices. Property taxes on the Biltmore are way under market too thanks to Prop 13. wonder if they cancelled out?
But I repeat, ad naseum, Caruso is a smart guy and din't get wealthy building projects that wouldn't make money. Think he knows more than GluteousMaximus about such things as real estate investment, development, long-term thinking, etc.?
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
April 16, 2012 at 9:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)