Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs are growing in popularity in Southern California because, proponents say, they are the best thing for busy Americans since sliced bread. When you join a CSA, farmers receive a flat rate in advance to cultivate your weekly organic produce and, in many cases, deliver it to your doorstep. Representatives often explain that not only are CSA programs convenient, affordable, local, and organic, but they also strengthen the bond and transparency between farmer and shopper — taking the mysteries of “what” and “where” out of food shopping.
Recognizing the health, social, and environmental benefits of such programs, UCSB think tanks are expanding the “support your local farmer” concept to include fish with a newly proposed Community Supported Fishery (CSF) program.
With $12,400 in funding from the Associated Students Coastal Fund, Santa Barbara residents may soon see the launch of a CSF program in full force. Project coleader Carrie Culver said, “CSFs are a win-win situation for the entire community. Citizens will learn more about fishing activities occurring in their own backyard and be able to make informed decisions about the seafood they consume and the management of local marine resources. Local fishermen and businesses involved with the CSF will benefit from the support provided through the program.”
To date, over 95 percent of the seafood consumed by the community of Santa Barbara is imported. Additionally, at least 95 percent of the seafood caught locally is exported. The decentralization of aquaculture and fishing industries can not only lead to reduced carbon emissions, but it will also allow shoppers to “cut out the middleman” as they can purchase fresh-caught fish directly from the source.
Stephanie Mutz, a commercial fisherman and Research Coordinator of Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara added, “California fisheries have some of the most stringent regulations and well-managed fisheries in the world, and [fishermen] embrace those regulations if it protects our marine ecosystem while providing food for the community. A CSF provides an opportunity for us to fish less and make more money to support our families.”
The Coastal Fund hopes to launch the CSF in 2012 and expects that students and other members of the campus community will play a major role in running the program. The grant provides two quarters of support for groundwork planning and an undergraduate internship. Visit sbseafood.org for the latest updates on the program. For more information on other projects and funding opportunities, visit coastalfund.org.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
I know this is a "News Brief". But I'm assuming it's not just a press release either, because you usually say so at the top. So I ask: Where are the editors at the Indy? This article is wholesale misleading if not just plain wrong. The headline says "UCSB Spearheads...", and early on inside the article you find a reference to "UCSB think tanks are expanding the support your local farmer...".
So you get the idea that the Institution is commencing some big initiative, or that one of the research centers there is doing a big project. But after reading it twice, all you find is that it's student government granting a slug of student fees they control to the latest cause. No Institutional backing for it. No major research initiative from one of the centers or other "think tanks" supporting it. Not a contribution to or support for this from UCSB, the "big gorilla", at all (at least nothing reported here). It's just a segment of the student government there, celebrating the delights of spending o.p.m.
It's no big deal, we get the real picture after reading it; it's just very sloppy journalism and disappointing from my favorite local news source. All you had to do was insert the word "Students" after "UCSB" in the headline, to double the quality and accuracy of the final journalistic product. Why didn't you? Or why didn't you at least put "Press Release" at the top?
OldDawg (anonymous profile)
May 21, 2011 at 9:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi OldDawg,
While there's no need for dramatics, you're right, and we've changed the headline to make things more clear.
Thanks,
Tyler
Tyler (Tyler Hayden)
May 21, 2011 at 12:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)