Imagine if you ordered a beer one night at a State Street bar, but instead of popping the cap off your brew, the bartender wrapped the bottle in a brown paper bag and asked if you wanted the receipt.
That’s the scenario Matthew Lanford, owner of Santa Barbara Cigar & Tobacco, finds comparable to California State Senate Bill 575. Introduced on February 17, the bill to ban smoking would include tobacco retailers and other workplaces once exempt from the state’s Smoke-Free Workplace laws, implemented over a decade ago. Smoke shops are “the last bastion for cigar smoking,” said Lanford, for whom a large part of smoking culture relies on casual conversations at tobacco shops over a lit cigar.
Santa Barbara Cigar & Tobacco has been on Figueroa Street for 15 years, where a smokers’ lounge occupies the back half of the store, unbeknownst to most passersby or even casual customers in the front part of the store. Leather couches line this dimly lit room where puffs of tobacco smoke lazily hover above smokers at all hours of the day.
Word has it that SB 575 won’t pass, says Lanford. All the same, the tobacconist and the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association stand strongly against the bill.
Tobacco is a legal product, the association’s legislative director, Chris McCalla, said via press release, and its use should not be legislatively prohibited. “Not only that,” he added, “but Californians and visitors to the state who enjoy an occasional good cigar with a glass of wonderful California wine will have virtually nowhere to do so if this legislation is allowed to pass.” Among the places where Senate Bill 575 would ban smoking are private clubs, businesses with five or fewer employees, banquet rooms, and employee break rooms.
Lanford sees the bill as the Legislature’s way of making California a “nanny state” by taking away the “finer and funner things.”
A lot of the force behind the push for SB 575 is in the employee protection against second-hand smoke, an issue that always seems to be up in the air. But McCalla disagrees that there is “no safe level” of second-hand smoke, a claim stated on the Web site of the bill’s sponsor, Senator Mark DeSaulnier.
Recently, Lanford’s insurance company, Prudential Health Insurance, categorized him as a nonsmoker based on the nicotine levels in his blood, despite the five to 10 cigars Lanford smokes weekly. However, that doesn’t mean Lanford thinks it’s okay to smoke in front of his kids: As usual, there is a time and place for everything. According to Lanford, smokers know what they’re getting themselves into, and since there are so few places left to enjoy a smoke other than tobacco shops, he has to wonder, “Who’s it hurting?”


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace




Previous Month



Comments
Why would a non smoker get a job in a tobacco shop? Will this Gestapo oppression EVER end???? Why not just take smokers to a trench and shoot them?
generalsn (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2011 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Right^!
cmetzenberg (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2011 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We walked from Chapala to State via Figueroa night Friday night. The stench of cigar smoke at the sidewalk was nauseating. If it's not OK for Lanford to smoke in front of his own kids, why is it OK to push second hand smoke onto the general public and theirs? Legal doesn't mean it's right, only that the tobacco lobby combined with a population of addicted customers has been overwhelmingly powerful. The fact that tobacco smokers choose a self-destructive pleasure gives them no right to impose the toxic fallout on others in public spaces. Lower State Street reeks of cigarettes, and arguments about the rights of the few to poison the rest don't wash.
anemonefish (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2011 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
anemonefish, I think you should stay at home and seal your house in a plastic bubble. Don't venture out in this dangerous smelly world where society is pushing it's evil ways upon you. The toxic fallout from cigarette/cigar smoke really, because all I smell when walking around lower to upper State is the smoke from all the traffic that is stuck in grid lock destroying this planet. Maybe we could focus a bill on the real toxic fallout that is killing us. The tobacco lobby does not even come close to the grip the petroleum companies have on us and the world. They will make sure we buy there oil at no matter what cost, till we choke and all die on the toxic fallout. At least smokers have a choice to be apart of their company lobby or quit. We do not have a choice as far as driving, yes there are some better cars out there but even to charge them it takes the petroleum companies to generate the energy and creating more toxic fallout. Smokers can just quit if they want to! Plus smokers pay all these stupid taxes to help fund programs when these incompetent lawmakers fall short on there promises. You should thank those dedicated smokers out there for helping out.
It is an art to make a truly great cigar and smoke it correctly, plus cigar smokers are really nice people! It is a no brainier to just pay some petroleum companies that will never help you, never care about you, destroy the environment and take your money.
So buy a class 4 respirator before you go out in to this smelly world or better yet find a new street to get to State on.
Now who is is really addicted and self-destructive?
miked442 (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2011 at 2:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another example of the erosion of personal freedom. I'm no anti-government right-winger, however I am a believer in government leaving me alone. A legal business selling a legal product will be forced to close. What's next? Close the restaurants on State St. because second-hand meat smoke may be carcinogenic and PETA types are offended?
I grew up in California in the late 50s and early 60s and remember when people took personal responsibility for their lives. As I read articles such as this I mourn that my grand children will never have such freedom.
richardkg (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2011 at 9:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
@richardkg and miked442
What is it about “no safe level of second-hand smoke" that you don't understand?
Cancer cures smoking
Second hand smoke = LUNG RAPE
DinahMason (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2011 at 10:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Using that word, the R word, takes away its power when applied here because it really isn't that. You're like that boy that cried wolf. What the problem is? You have to smell a little tobacco on your way to get your coffee, pizza, mexican food? You can walk on the other side of the street. Come now, with all the problems we are facing some are spending their time trying to pass these kinds of laws? I guess some have too much time on their hands.
spacey (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2011 at 12:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@DinahMason, Really? Yes maybe sitting in the cigar lounge may effect you over six months to a year of a good 8 hours a day. Simply walking down the street, I am sure you will be just fine. You are already breathing in way more harmful crap in the air around you. So take that little whiff of cigar smoke as a breath of fresh air. I think there are a few more problems facing this world right now that you could look into. At Home Depot you can get a respirator mask for 30 bucks and you will be just fine. Please don't ever use the R word out of contrast, not cool at all...
miked442 (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2011 at 2:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
One more thing, for all of you people out there afraid of smoke. Look up studies on the indoor air quality of your favorite stores (dept. stores being the worst). Next time you walk into that lovely, shining Saks Fifth Avenue up the street or any other store. You are walking into a huge muli-level toxic air space. All the cleaners they use, the polishes they use on the floors/metal surfaces, the chemicals in the cloths, bathroom cleaners and list goes on and on. The reason these stores "smell good" is the chemical companies way of hiding the toxic smell their cleaning products produce with even more chemicals. Then all of these chemicals are mixed together, blown though the HVAC (air conditioning/heating) system right down to the level of your nose, then recycled again and again. You can find some studies on this but it is hard, takes time and real digging because they don't want you to know.
These stores would be boycotted if they had a smoking lounge but because you probably have never thought about the indoor air quality you just go right on shopping with a smile... If the smoking lounge was chemical free and isolated from the rest of the store it might even be safer than looking through that store for the perfect outfit...
miked442 (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2011 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm keeping my popcorn hopper churning away as I watch the death dance of Big Tobacco's "legal" drug trade and its terminal consequences wafting along the social jetstream of the country and the world hoping to get to some semblance of a sane ending as to why and how growers and manufacturers can continue to be subsidized and allowed to ply their nefarious wares relatively unabated.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 11:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This idiots want to come out with these kind of laws when they can't solve the budget? I wonder why CA is going to the dogs? And for all you complainers about tobacco smoke: you can only complain once you stop using your car, nail polish/remover, and buying sweat shop made clothing. Until then, shut it!
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well said, AZ2SB! Exactly!
miked442 (anonymous profile)
March 15, 2011 at 7:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)