[A previous version of this article is posted here.]
The nonprofit volunteer organization K-9 PALS, which has helped care for dogs at the Santa Barbara County Animal Shelter for almost 10 years, announced plans to withdraw from the shelter at the end of August. The decision comes three and a half weeks after the dismissal of K-9 PALS president Janelle Ward as volunteer coordinator at the facility.
“K-9 PALS will no longer be an organization supervising and managing volunteer activities at an animal shelter,” K-9 PALS boardmembers wrote in an emailed statement. “Given the events of the past 18 months, we believe this is the best option for both the organization and the [shelter].”
While the Web site for K-9 PALS (which is short for K-9 Placement & Assistance League) boasts that the organization has a “unique relationship” with County Animal Services, that alliance appears to have decayed. On July 7, the county announced in an email that Ward would no longer coordinate volunteers as part of a “restructuring” of the volunteer program.
County Animal Services Director Jan Glick declined to comment on Ward’s dismissal on the basis that it was a “personnel action.” Ward — who also coordinated the shelter foster program — had volunteered at the shelter for over 17 years.
In Ward’s absence, Stacy Silva — who is the Community Outreach Coordinator for County Animal Services — is overseeing the volunteer program. Animal activist Dr. Lee Heller has temporarily taken over the shelter foster program, which Animal Services plans to restructure.
According to K-9 PALS volunteer Mark Bandurraga, Ward’s dismissal came in concert with a growing rift between Animal Services and K-9 PALS volunteers about an apparent change in the shelter’s euthanasia policy. While Glick said that the policy of only euthanizing “unadoptable” animals with serious behavioral or health problems has not been altered, Bandurraga said there has been growing disagreement between the two organizations about how to define an unadoptable dog.
“For the past two years, to my knowledge, previously adoptable dogs were euthanized only because of a recent bite incident. In the past two months, at least two dogs have been put down without having a recent bite incident on their record,” Bandurraga said.
The shelter staff discusses cases in weekly care and evaluation committee meetings, at which they talk about the animals being considered for euthanasia. In a meeting several days before Ward’s dismissal, a black pit bull named Darlene was designated for euthanasia due to behavioral problems. The discussion of whether to put Darlene down, according to Bandurraga, was “tearful” because some thought Darlene’s issues could be overcome with training and socialization.
Times have been tough for the County Animal Shelter, which was forced to lay off an employee and cut its tri-county budget by $75,000 for the new fiscal year that began last month. Overcrowding is a continual problem, as the 44-kennel shelter is often filled beyond its comfortable capacity of between 90 and 100 dogs. Due to its crunched budget, the shelter has relied on K-9 PALS to fund about $6,000 per month in food for dogs with special nutritional needs and about $50,000 this year for special medical care.
All sides agree that this volunteer force should be sustained. “We need volunteers, and we’re hopeful that the volunteers will continue to come out and help the dogs,” Glick said. Ward echoed Glick’s sentiment in an emailed statement. “We are encouraging our K-9 PALS volunteers to continue with their volunteer work at the shelter,” she wrote, adding that “the withdrawal of the organization from the Shelter is not meant to hinder the shelter volunteer program in any way.”
According to Glick, volunteer activity has stayed consistent since Ward’s departure, with about 35 volunteers donating their time to care for the dogs each week. For his part, Bandurraga said he plans to continue volunteering at the shelter for “as long as the county will let me.”
After leaving the shelter at the end of the month, K-9 PALS will continue to provide veterinary-care assistance, prescription dog foods, and spaying and neutering programs for dogs at the county shelter. At that time, K-9 PALS plans to transition into a “resource” for all animal welfare groups and shelters in the county.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
This is totally unacceptable. The world has not advanced in any direction. The answer everyone has when something doesn't fit, is to kill. What about building a larger area for the dogs. I would have rather seen my donations to the Animal Shelter go towards that, than to think of what they may have done with money I have sent them.
grinnin (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 11:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh my, this whole situation is a horrible, unavoidable tragedy. What a bunch of egos. This is all fragmented and will deteriorate even more. Glick should be replaced with fresh, invigorated leadership. And warehousing every single sort of nice pit bull WON'T work. I've never seen any city with such a morass of animal shelters and support groups. There are professional standards and training to help people make good, humane, kind euthanasia decisions. Obviously, no one is availing themselves of these resources!
eddiekd (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2011 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Please get me out!
Come volunteer and help me to pee stretch my legs!
Thanks.
SBshelterdog (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2011 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm surprised that this conversation doesn't show up more often as it sure seems like a dirty little secret in this town. I, myself, am an animal lover of astronomical proportions, yet, I also believe that more animals need to be euthanized rather than spending much of their lives in cages using up resources that could be better utilized.
Sounds like there's not enough room at the shelter and like someone else has said, there seems to be a clusterfudge around the whole operation. The dogs are suffering because of this. It appears to have become a battle of wills.
Who's really caring for these dogs? If you allow and fight for dogs to stay in cages for more than a six month stretch, are you *really* caring for them or are you allowing your ego to take charge? Egos aside, what is an acceptable standard of life for these animals? Does anyone really care?
I feel like there needs to be a new way of viewing the procedure of euthanization as one that allows for freedom, compassion and truly deep respect for the animal. In fact, it may actually be the very best and most loving thing we can do in many cases.
santabanana (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2011 at 1:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Euthanasia is a necessary evil. Not all dogs can be saved even if there were unlimited resources. The fact is there are bad dogs in the world just like there are bad people. You need to focus on the ones that can be saved and placed in homes.
I have seen some awesome volunteers at the shelter come and go. It is a tough and emotional gig. It saddens me to hear of the shelter/K9 Pals split. They did some great work together for the dogs and the community.
Michelle
Past Contracted Trainer
& Behavior Consultant
to the SB Shelter/K9 Pals
hunter01 (anonymous profile)
August 8, 2011 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)