• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    A License to Knead

    Goleta Ordinance Aims to Define Massage


    Thursday, September 17, 2009
    By Ben Preston (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Goleta has plenty of massage parlors to choose from, but which is the right one? A new ordinance making its way through the City Council’s review process is aimed at making sure that massage therapists with their doors open for business in Goleta are not only legal, but know what they’re doing. Coming on the heels of SB 731, signed into law by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger last November to provide certification guidelines for massage therapists, Goleta’s proposed regulation provides certification for those in the profession who don’t yet have the state license. However, any regulation put in place by Goleta could be superseded by state law. Some practitioners expressed concern to the Goleta City Council that there wouldn’t be enough transition time for estheticians—lower level skin therapists with many hours of localized massage experience focused on the face, neck, hands, and feet—to gain a valid license under the city’s tiered certification system. “If the ordinance stays as it is [in the first reading], I would have to take a lot of time off work to meet the requirements,” said Auriel Cochran, an esthetician at Cutting Edge Hair and Body Salon in Goleta.

    <strong>THERE’S THE RUB:</strong>  Cindi Sundberg, owner of Cutting Edge Hair & Body in Goleta, expressed concern that some of her technicians would have trouble meeting the city’s new requirements.
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    THERE’S THE RUB: Cindi Sundberg, owner of Cutting Edge Hair & Body in Goleta, expressed concern that some of her technicians would have trouble meeting the city’s new requirements.

    Although they indicated that the language of the proposed ordinance needed to be cleaned up by City Attorney Tim Giles before the second reading, the council voted 4-1 on Tuesday evening to accept its first reading, with Councilmember Michael Bennett dissenting due to what he said was the document’s excessive specificity. “Why are we supporting something when the state law says it can be circumvented?” he said, pointing out a part of the city ordinance that called for the use of 60-watt incandescent bulbs in certain applications.

    “This is an opportunity for the police to weed out those who have been involved in criminal acts under the guise of massage, or would otherwise pose some level of risk to the public,” said Giles.

    Aside from the licensure side of the ordinance, the issue of curtailing illegal operations masquerading as massage outfits also seemed to be a major part of it. “This is an opportunity for the police to weed out those who have been involved in criminal acts under the guise of massage, or would otherwise pose some level of risk to the public,” said Giles, adding that the Goleta Police Department views massage therapy regulation as a valuable tool in accomplishing their goal of curtailing prostitution.

    While most of Goleta’s several massage parlors are purported to be legitimate establishments, a simple Google search turns up the Web site eroticMP.com, which names four of them as places to go for more attentive service. “Stop wasting time and money on services you don’t want, and get all the information and reviews on massage parlors right here,” the Web site’s banner exclaims. At the very top of the first page of the same Google search for “massage parlor Goleta” is the site USASexGuide.info, a forum in which users share information that appears to be about the best spots to pick up women for hire. While a difficult-to-read vernacular is used in much of it, the most recent entries—from August 21 and September 2—make unabashed references to specific locations on upper State Street, and in Old Town Goleta.

    “Those people are not coming from our schools,” said Katie Mickey, owner of the Santa Barbara Body Therapy Institute, one of a handful of area schools aimed at furnishing graduates with state licensure. Addressing the Goleta City Council on Tuesday, Mickey said that if people interested in massage careers were put through state-recognized training programs such as the one offered by her school, being licensed by one jurisdiction as opposed to another wouldn’t be as much of an issue. “The system isn’t broken; we already have a process in the state for approving schools.”

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    So the Goleta Council is trying to protect patrons who want to get their ashes hauled from getting their ashes hauled.

    Things must be pretty good in the Good Land if this is all the council has to do.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    SezMe (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 1:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Why on earth does the city council care if two adults make a consensual business transaction? If I don't think the massage parlor's quality is up to my standard, then I can choose another one. I don't need the city to do that for me, thanks.

    Just because somebody is "certified" this or that doesn't mean they are better at giving quality massages, it just means they have more 'official' training. What about alternative massage techniques? What if some of them are better? These better options get left in the dust due to government intervention in the market place, especially regarding licensing practices. If the city wants to use the resources to license somebody, then great.. but let the alternatives operate as unlicensed businesses so that the public can decide which is better.

    Also, isn't it better and safer to have the lewd acts taking place in massage parlors than out on the streets? This is a perfect example of how people generally gravitate towards safer, semi-legal options when given the opportunity rather than putting themselves in danger looking on the black market. Legalizing prostitution would create a safer, healthier environment and it would help to end the practice of sex slavery that is so common on the black market.

    People who are advocating these prohibition laws need to start taking responsibility for the rampant gang activity and more dangerous drugs that arrive on the black market and help to destroy society and greatly increase the profits of those who choose to run illicit businesses. This allows them to expand their business and it gives them that much more incentive to attract more and more customers. If you want to blame increase in poverty, drug or gang activity in this country on anything, it is prohibition.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    loonpt (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 10:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I agree with loonpt to most of what that she wrote. And I agree with Bennett's dissenting from approval of such a measure. This is truly a waste of time and energy.

    It is the gang activity, graffitti, and drug problems that should be dealt with.
    It is OK if the Goleta Police Department wants to keep an eye on these businesses, but not to shut down legitimate businesses as their employees are continuing their education in massage techniques.

    The Goleta Council should spend more time on running the City of Goleta properly, instead of looking for more ways of making it difficult to do business in Goleta.
    And why did the Council accept the ordinance on the first reading, when they admitted it had "to be cleaned up"?

    Legalizing prostitution is not on my list of priorities, but there are safeguards required of legalized prostitution in Clark County that might be protective to those involved. But what loonpt said just before that statement does make sense. Better safe sex between two consenting adults in a controlled envirnment--if that is taking place--than in the bushes.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    bajamama (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 12:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    66.9°
    Wind:
    8 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    4. Teacher in Trouble
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. My Swine Flu Experience
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.