Up for grabs in this year’s Santa Barbara City Council race is the whole ball of wax. Four of the council’s seven seats could change hands. At the very least, three new faces will be sworn in come January. Depending on the outcome, there could be a new council majority next year, one that tilts significantly further to the right than the council — long a bastion of liberal leaning Democrats — has for decades. But whoever wins, City Hall will be a decidedly grimmer place. With budget cuts — ranging from the painful to the excruciating — being the first, second, and third order of the day, the real mystery is why anyone would want the job.
Yet want it they do and in unprecedented numbers. Running for the three council seats are 13 candidates, eight of whom have enough money, backing, and endorsements to be reckoned with. Likewise, five candidates are vying for the mayoral post, three of whom are genuine impact players.
The defining reality of this year’s race is the astonishing quantity of campaign cash that’s been raised and spent — enough to carpet comb the airwaves and tax the carrying capacity of most mailboxes. The 8,000-pound gorilla, of course, is Randall Van Wolfswinkel, a one-time Santa Barbara resident turned Texas billionaire, who has spent well over $250,000 bankrolling a conservative slate of candidates: Dale Francisco for mayor and Michael Self, Frank Hotchkiss, and Cathie McCammon for council. In addition, Van Wolfswinkel is spending lavishly on behalf of Measure B, the lower heights initiative that would reduce the maximum allowable size of new buildings to 40 feet downtown and 45 feet elsewhere. Van Wolfswinkel’s donations have been unprecedented in tone as well as size, paying for negative attack ads the likes of which Santa Barbara hasn’t seen in 70 years.
This more conservative slate — which includes two Republicans, one Democrat, and one-declined to state — is hoping to tap into the public’s clear anxiety over the dismal state of the economy. Its candidates regularly blast the current council for mismanaging the current fiscal crisis and squandering City Hall’s reserves by giving out pay-raises to politically generous public employee unions. In addition, they claim that law enforcement against gangs and panhandlers has been too lax, and that City Hall has bent too many rules on behalf of too many developers pushing projects that are too big and too dense. In general, they complain that City Hall has been taken over by the younger, activist wing of the Democratic Party and that the current council turns a deaf ear to the concerns of neighborhood watch-dogs and average citizens.
Although registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by a margin of 2.5 to 1, conservative slate strategists point to the success councilmember Dale Francisco — the sole Republican in City Hall — enjoyed in 2007. In that race, Francisco — an outspoken critic of bulb-outs, roundabouts, and a mother-knows-best attitude emanating from City Hall — came in first in 10 high turn-out precincts dominated by Democratic majorities. By supporting Measure B, they’re hoping that Francisco and the slate — with Van Wolfswinkel’s money — can garner votes from older and established traditional Democrats disgruntled about high density development, affordable housing, and alternative transportation policies embraced by the younger breed of “New Urbanist” planning activists, also associated with the Democratic Party. That support, coupled with the city’s base of Republican and conservative voters, might prove sufficient to “kick the bums out,” especially if turn-out is low. (Traditionally, liberal candidates fare better in Santa Barbara in high turn-out elections; conservatives do better in lower-turn out elections.)
With so many candidates in the race, it’s mathematically probable that the victorious candidates will prevail with only a small percentage of the actual votes cast. Adding to a sense of uncertainty and confusion, this year marks the first time City Hall is holding an all mail-in election.
Running against the conservative “slate” is a de facto slate unified only by the fact that its members have been backed by most of the major South Coast organizations associated with the Democratic Party. And they all share the same campaign chief, the ever opinionated and acerbic Jeremy Lindaman. These include councilmember and mayoral candidate Helene Schneider and, for council, incumbent councilmember Grant House, planning commissioner Harwood “Bendy” White, and preservationist Dianne Channing.
Members of the Democratic slate — like those backed by Van Wolfswinkel — insist they’re running alone. They point out that on Measure B — this year’s defining wedge issue — their positions are all over the map. (Schneider declines to take a position, House opposes it, and White and Channing support it.) On fiscal matters and planning controversies, they also run the gamut. But regardless of how critical they at times are of various city policies, they have all enjoyed considerable success painting within the procedural lines by which City Hall currently operates. They may recoil at being tagged City Hall “insiders,” but if they’re not quite “the bums” the conservative slate wants to kick out, they qualify as kissing cousins.
Vying for traction as viable candidates independent of established power structures are David Pritchett, a bluntly outspoken populist and environmentalist who vows to “shake things up,” and John Thyne, the successful businessman who pledges to bring a sense of social justice to his pragmatic approach to problem solving. What follows are rough sketches of these eight council candidates who’ve managed to attract some serious endorsements and to raise some serious campaign cash. (The other five candidates were profiled last week in ”The Outsiders”. Next week, we will, look at the mayoral race. For complete and ongoing election coverage, see Independent.com/elect-09.)
• Grant House
• Harwood "Bendy" White
• Diane Channing
• Michael Self
• Frank Hotchkiss
• Cathie McCammon
• David Pritchett
• John Thyne
Related Links
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
A DUI probation violator and a deadbeat who went on a $38,000 spending spree before filing for bankruptcy are two of the front runners in this race? It is hard to believe you treat these guys like serious candidates. And to think The Independent endorsed the guy who can't manage his personal finances to clean up the city's financial woes. Please....
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1
Zevonfan (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 5:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Cathie McCammon's my choice. then throw in
Diane Channing, and send the developers friend
Grant House packing
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
easternpacific (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Okay, 10 years ago, according to the News-Press's truly acerbic Travis Armstrong (I don't know Lindaman so I don't know how he compares), David Pritchett filed for personal bankruptcy. Bad things happen to good people (and to bad people, too) and people move on, straighten things out.
It's worth pointing out that that is the purpose of bankruptcy law, to allow a fresh start. Sounds as though he has done so, with an environmental restoration business and the local media work of his wife and him. 10 years ago! Anything negative since that the public should know to make an intelligent decision? ...I am sure if there is that the News-Press would have exposed it --- the personal business info must have required some digging.
I am voting for B but holding my nose because of the reek of its proximity to the POSB slate of candidates. And this kind of disgusting personal attack strengthens my resolve to vote for Pritchett.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
at_large (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Sad that someone groovy like Lane Anderson can't get elected because he doesn't play the "political" game. I have hopes for my homeboy David Pritchett but the forces against him are mobilizing. Maybe because he has a chance to beat the Democratic insider trio and he has way more to offer than the Van Wolf-backed candidates. (Have you ever listened carefully to Michael Self or Frank Hotchkiss? They are uninformed.) Now Travis Armstrong at the News-Suppress is attacking Pritchett. Watch your back, dude!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
BongHit (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'll be voting for the Democratic Party endorsed candidates (Schneider, House, Chaning & White). As is often the case -- it's the best way to make sure my vote counts in this low-turn out election.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
LC (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's a pretty weak field. What's your PREDICTIONS?
I say,
Mayor: Scheinder ( Steve and Dale cancel each other)
Council: Channing, White, maybe House. ( Van
Wolfswinkel may be using reverse psychology to keep the development-friendly democrats in power, or he's dumb enough to be used as a lightning rod by the press against his supposed candidates.
Measure B: Yes by a landslide. ( no one wants more
ugly tall buildings except developers and architects.)
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Georgy (anonymous profile)
October 22, 2009 at 5:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Defeat the policies of accusation, rumor and innuendo that the Republican Party has used in the past and brought to SB politics.
Remember those who hope to gain from charging others with bogus claims and groundless innuendo and defeat them.
Send this kind of politics back to Texas. Santa Barbara deserves much better.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
JohnMcKnight (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2009 at 6:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"regardless of how critical they at times are of various city policies, they have all enjoyed considerable success painting within the procedural lines by which City Hall currently operates. They may recoil at being tagged City Hall “insiders,” but if they’re not quite “the bums” the conservative slate wants to kick out, they qualify as kissing cousins."
Well said, Nick. None of these clowns will do anything to change the way this City is run despite the fact we desperately need to do so.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Justice (anonymous profile)
October 23, 2009 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Steve C still hasn't confessed to his little "problem" he had @ the Chamber. Wonder when that will come out?
Word has it that he was even renting another office in the same building. Someone want to come forward on this one? The story is out there if you scratch at the surface ever so slightly.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
BeachLivin (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2009 at 6:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Cushman for Mayor. Hotchkiss, Self, and Mccannon for Council. Voila - a centrist government that will work to improve the business climate (the source of all tax revenue), eliminate ridiculous spending on traffic calming devices (and hopefully cut the traffic planning department in half), and direct the police to enforce existing laws for a change.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
October 24, 2009 at 6:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Isn't there another candidate running? Cruzito Herrera Cruz- I saw him on the ballot. Maybe someone could explain why he was not included in this article, i am away from SB at college.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
harborat (anonymous profile)
October 25, 2009 at 6:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment