Critics of Santa Barbara’s regulatory apparatus have long complained about “the People’s Republic of Santa Barbara,” but no one has sought to tag longtime Chamber of Commerce President Steve Cushman, one of five mayoral candidates now vying for the top spot at City Hall, as a practicing socialist. Until now.
A campaign mailer paid for by Texas developer Randall Van Wolfswinkel, titled “From Russia with Love,” shows a grainy, blurry photo of Cushman adorned with a hammer and sickle, long the icon associated with the U.S.S.R, the now defunct Communist nation. The allusion is to the $50,000 campaign donation Cushman received from Russian billionaire banker Sergey Grishin, who has owned property in Montecito for eight years and just purchased the historic Val Verde estate, formerly owned by Dr. Warren Austin, for $15.3 million. Van Wolfswinkel is backing City Council candidate Dale Francisco in his bid for mayor.
Francisco and Cushman are battling it out for the right-of-center voting block against Councilmember Helene Schneider, the mayoral candidate backed by the city’s progressive activist community. (Candidates Isaac Garret and Bob Hansen are also running, but neither works to raise money from donors.)
Cushman, who received the mailer at his home this Friday, joked, “You know, I’ve always wanted to build skyscrapers with onions at the top, and turn Santa Barbara into a communist town.” On a more serious note, Cushman said, “This is like a bad movie. It’s a war. I feel people are going to get mad about the mailers and the nastiness of the campaign.”
The mailer noted that Grishin’s contribution was the largest single donation to a candidate in the history of Santa Barbara city elections. Readers were cautioned to wonder what Cushman had promised in exchange for such a donation. Cushman noted the irony of being attacked by Van Wolfswinkel and his political action committee, Preserve Our Santa Barbara, which have set new campaign spending records of their own, raising $270,000 thus far for the city elections.
Cushman said that Grishin supports him because he’s a businessman and thinks Cushman will bring a pro-business mindset to city government. Cushman said he’d met with Grishin once for 90 minutes earlier this year. Cushman described Grishin as being ardently pro-capitalist, and recounted that Grishin thought there was more capitalism being practiced in Russia today than in the United States. Cushman also said that Grishin did not want to see what happened in his native Moscow happen to Santa Barbara.
After the mailer went out, Cushman said Grishin emailed to see if there was anything he could do help. Cushman said he’ll decline any further donations from Grishin; he said he’d suggest Grishin donate to a worthy charity instead. Cushman said he’s never met Van Wolfswinkel, but that he’d give him the same advice.
Van Wolfswinkel has also sent out mailers attacking mayoral candidate Helene Schneider, likening her to a fiscal Titanic. His political action committee has run TV commercials attacking incumbent City Council candidate Grant House, charging that House was in tax trouble. (House said he got behind with the IRS in 1991, but that he took care of that problem 19 years ago. Since, then, he said, he’s had no problems.) House is the only incumbent out of a field of 13 in the council race.
Besides endorsing Francisco for mayor, Van Wolfswinkel has endorsed Michael Self, Frank Hotchkiss, and Cathie McCammon for City Council. Van Wolfswinkel and his slate of candidates support Measure B, the ballot initiative that would reduce the maximum allowable height of new buildings by one third. House opposes Measure B.
Cushman predicted that the nasty ads would backlash on Measure B, and predicted the initiative would lose. He said surveys he conducted three weeks ago showed that building heights ranked at the bottom when likely voters were asked to list their top concerns. Those results line up with a survey taken in September by the National Association of Realtors that indicated building heights trailed after other issues such as crime, gangs, affordable housing, the budget, and the economy as a priority with likely voters. The realtors’ survey showed that Measure B enjoyed a 6 percent advantage in the polls; it also showed that likely voters—especially Democratic women between the ages of 40 and 65—were apt to change positions when exposed to a series of arguments against Measure B. The realtors' survey suggested that Measure B would fail by a 4 percent margin if opponents could get their message out to voters.
Supporters of Measure B blasted the survey as a “push poll,” designed to serve as a propaganda tool rather than to accurately gauge public opinion. They noted that the pollsters did not expose the pool of 400 voters to arguments in favor of Measure B, but only arguments against. While opponents of Measure B concede that point, they insist the survey was not a push poll. Typically, push polls involve far more than 400 voters and are relatively brief. These surveys took 12 minutes to complete.
Regardless of the realtors’ survey results, Cushman asserted that the tsunami of campaign money has changed the fundamental dynamics of the race. “This is no longer a grassroots campaign,” he said. “It’s no longer a bunch of people who got together who signed a petition because they didn’t like a couple of big buildings. People are looking at all the money and saying ‘Wait a minute, what’s that all about? Why would they do that?’”
Supporters of Measure B have also called foul, taking exception to mailers sent out by the Democratic Party accusing Van Wolfswinkel of trying to “buy” the election and depicting him as an over-the-top Texas caricature flanked by George W. Bush.
Cushman claimed that his surveys—taken three weeks ago—indicated that Helene Schneider enjoyed a six-point advantage over Cushman and that Cushman enjoyed an eight-point advantage over Francisco. (A Police Officers Association survey reportedly showed that Cushman enjoyed greater name recognition than Francisco, but that Francisco enjoyed greater support from likely voters.) Cushman noted that regardless of the rankings, his survey showed that 35 percent of the voters were undecided. “That just shows that the whole thing is up for grabs,” he said.
In the meantime, Cushman said he expects Francisco to ask him to get out of the race. He said Francisco called him yesterday to meet, though the nature of the meeting was not clear. Cushman said he told Francisco that he’d think about it. “But after getting that hammer-and-sickle mailer, I’m not so sure,” he said. “Maybe I’ll meet with him in Moscow.”
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
So the election may well come down to a referendum on whose money has been most effective in spreading the most misinformation.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
pk (anonymous profile)
October 9, 2009 at 5:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
pk: tell me something new.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
binky (anonymous profile)
October 9, 2009 at 5:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How could a billionaire be a Communist?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
October 9, 2009 at 9:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"A campaign mailer paid for by Texas developer Randall Van Wolfswinkel, titled “From Russia with Love,” shows a grainy, blurry photo of Cushman adorned with a hammer and sickle..."
I'm glad to see there's some entertainment value in this election. Those previous local elections were so boring. This is better than watching sitcoms.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 9, 2009 at 9:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Francisco to ask Cushman to withdraw?
Why not the other way around? Francisco is already on the City Council, and IF Cushman were win, they'd both be in clover.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
maven12 (anonymous profile)
October 10, 2009 at 7:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is getting really crazy. A Texas carpetbagger that went to SBHS thirty years ago reckons that he is a local. That same Texan thinks that there is something wrong with a Russian, who has owned a home in Montecito longer than the Texan, donating money to Cush's campaign. Based on the Texan's past donations to the Guliani and Romney campaigns, it is clear that he is very good at picking a loser. All hat no cattle.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2
Herschel_Greenspan (anonymous profile)
October 10, 2009 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
At this point, if Francisco would withdraw he would still have his council seat, Cushman would become mayor, Schneider would be out, and we'd all be better off. Forget about hats and cattle and Moscow - irrelevant nonsense - and think about who will improve our economic health and public safety. Leave the trivia to the small minds.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 2
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
October 10, 2009 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Craig Smith has the inside scoop on Van Wolfwinkel's dirty campaign here:
http://craigsmithsblog.blogspot.com/2009...
Finally, a connection between Francisco and Van Wolfwinkel. Interesting how unions like that are made .. the enemy of my enemies is my friend.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 2:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
God, I am so glad I already voted!
Does anyone actually read that campaign stuff? At our house it goes straight into the recycling, with no regard to who it came from. What a waste of paper and ink and money!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
mtndriver (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So what's with all these huge campaign donations and "independent" advertising bucks coming from Montecito? Last I looked, except for Coast Village Road, no part of Montecito is within the City of Santa Barbara.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There's something strangely appealing about Cushman, though I wish he had run for Council first. Has anyone ever shot right up to mayor, skipping a council tenure? I like his independence. He seems free of the political parties, which are increasingly out of touch with the people they are supposed to serve. Cushman, John Thyne, David Pritchett, Isaac Garrett are the independent candidates this season.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
TeresitaV (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
These Preserve Our Santa Barbara people make me sick. They're turning our elections into a nightmare.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
LC (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 12:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Vote for Helene Schneider and avoid another World War. Helene is what Santa Barbara is all about! You will notice her signs mostly in the front yards of city dwellers who know and love her. As a long time City Council member who is working for a more sustainable & progressive city, she is supported by lots and lots of people who actually live and work in our beautiful city! I just don't trust these outsider contributors who are trying to convince us that their first priority is the welfare of our community.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
vlhamilton (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 1:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Helene Schneider is supported by huge union donations, has already voted for salary increases the city can't afford, and has committed that no city worker will lose his or her job. This in a city that has a government twice the size of comparable cities and a big budget problem. It's not like the other candidates don't value our beauty and welfare; they just propose we do it affordably. Schneider's claim that she voted for a balanced budget is a joke, and a bad one at that. Get beyond your yellow-dog Democrat mindset and vote for a candidate that will no further our slide into bankruptcy.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 4:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh yes, don't forget John Thyne who was convicted of drunk driving and was busted again for having consumed booze prior to getting behind the wheel.
Santa Barbara doesn't need his ilk.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
billclausen (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 8:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thyne isn't running for mayor. But since you've raised that point, there are 13 council candidates - Thyne is only one and I sure won't vote for him. Hotchkiss, Self, Tevis. Independent thinkers, not owned by special interests (BTW the local Democratic machine IS a special interest, in case you missed that - it primarily represents those who make their living off the government, either by employment or handout).
And for those who think "out of town" interests are backing only Francisco and Cushman: where do you think all the Demounion money comes from? Local? Not hardly. In fact, most of the money in this town comes from "out of town" since we have almost no productive industry here. Tax money that pays for all the government and education institutions comes mostly from "out of town". So get off the "out of town" soapbox.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
October 12, 2009 at 9:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Its pretty plain to the average person that the slate represented by Francisco, Hotchkiss, and Self is benefiting from the crappy negative campaigning being paid for on their behalf by Randy Van Wolfswinkel. Although she can't control the content, would Self denounce the BS at today's Westside Center forum?
Nope. Craig Smith has the story here:
http://craigsmithsblog.blogspot.com/2009...
Sure provides some insight into what Self's character is all about.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
October 13, 2009 at 8:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment