The uproar that resulted from the effort to eliminate Carpinteria High School’s mascot, the Warrior, made headlines throughout the county, with students, alumni, and school officials alike debating the appropriateness of a symbol that some community members found offensive to Native Americans. Foremost among those objecting was Eli Cordero, a student of Native American descent who presented his feelings about the mascot at a March 2008 school board meeting. While resulting news stories gave voice to many who thought the historic value of the Warrior should supersede the objections, scant details about Cordero’s day-to-day life at school emerged. This changed on October 30, when the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) released a letter in response to a complaint by Cordero’s mother, Charisse Matisz-Cordero, that the Carpinteria School District did not adequately respond to retaliation by fellow students against her son. The letter dissects how school officials responded to alleged discrimination, not faulting the school for the way they handled the situation, but nonetheless pointing out how it could have done so differently.
Though Cordero no longer attends a district school, his remaining time at Carp High saw two death threats-one in the form of a student remarking that he wanted to kill Cordero and the other in form of the text “I hope u die” scrawled on a play script Cordero had left in the lunchroom. The OCR report notes that school officials contacted law enforcement in both incidents. In the former case, an interrogation revealed that the student who made the threat did not know who Cordero was. In the latter, law and school officials together concluded that it would be “difficult, if not impossible, to identify the person who made the threat,” according to the report. When OCR staff asked whether officials had reminded the student body that such threats were unacceptable, they allegedly responded that they “did not want to call further attention to the student.” The report continues, “From the point of view of [Cordero] and his family, all they knew was that the school told them nothing could be done.”
The report also notes that Cordero was taunted regularly by his fellow students, some of whom would allegedly look him in the eye and spout slogans like “Warrior spirit never dies” and “Go Warriors.” Cordero never reported incidents, allegedly feeling “there was no point in reporting the daily encounters because he did not think the school would do anything about them.” Though the report mentions no policy violations by the School District, it does imply a breakdown in communication. For example, though district officials did tell campus security to keep an eye on Cordero, the student was unaware of this precaution.
The district must now meet three OCR mandates. First, they must draft a “written guidance” to school staff communicating district policies and precautions included in the Civil Rights Act that protect students from discriminatory or retaliatory actions. They must train school staff in how to enforce these rules and punish offenders. And, thirdly, they must post on the district’s Web site a notice of students’ and parents’ right to “assert or protect the rights of individuals free from discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, or disability.”
“We did everything we could to protect the students,” said District Superintendent Paul Cordeiro of the report. Regarding the communication problems that the report hints at, Cordeiro said, “I’m not going to comment except to say that we made the best judgments at the time : and that involves some judgment calls that had [Cordero’s] safety in mind.” Speaking as a representative for United Carpinterians, an organization created to foster education and understanding of Native American issues, Toni Stuart offered this comment on the OCR letter: “The kind of intimidation and threat that created the hostile environment for this student can affect students who are not Native American but who are ‘different’ in some other way. : I would hope that the positive steps the district is taking will help to create an environment in our schools in which all students feel safe.”



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Saying "Go Warriors" is a threat? Wow what the hell happened to this world? Well as long as no Dons get together and complain about that imagery I am fine.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
1. The boy was threatened and that's not all that happened during this issue
2. On school grounds, an elder was threatened and harassed
3.a young native woman was hit with a rock during a march
4. on school grounds, another young native woman was spit upon by a Carp high student
5. a native veteran , who has since been deployed and returned from Afghanistan, was insulted on school grounds by Carpinterians
6. On young native woman had to leave Carp High school due to racial harassment the school did nothing about
The Justice Dept had to be brought in as well as the Office of Civil Rights
There are many other things that happened--so before you blow this off--you might want to think a little harder about the people in Carpinteria who do these kinds of things--unless, of course, you "Dons" approve of this behavior.
KanuMomma (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't think this article said that he was threatened by the statement "Go Warriors" but was taunted by students. If one can remember being in high school, high school students can express themselves in not very subtle ways. The article is aptly named Communication Breakdown. It seems to me the administrators could have set a better tone for students at the school.
kev (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 5:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Correction: a native young person had to leave Carp Hi before all this started--so there's a history there. As well as the kid who was removed from school because he was threatening to hurt other kids due to the bullying he was receiving. That's not the way to handle it--but he probably felt the school wasn't doing anything either. Even other kids got on TV and said he was being bullied. No wonder so many Carpinterians won't send their kids to school there!
KanuMomma (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 5:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Kev, that's exactly what the office of Civil Rights said --and I personally think the Independent is soft-shoeing it. The Office of Civil rights had concerns about the way Carpinteria High handled its bullying problem and the lack of effective action.
Just "doing what you have to" isn't making a positive change.
KanuMomma (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 5:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well much credit to the Native Americans who were above this behavior, and didn't get suckered in to violence. If someone feels offended because they believe they are being dishonered then they should take down that imagery. Of the Natives I know, Chiricua Apaches are proud of their warrior image and are pretty well-known as that. If all Native imagery is off-limits how about honoring our warriors of today like the soldier who represents America? Being a warrior is not always a bad thing.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 9:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Political Correctness
This is what led to Major Hussan killing all those soldiers.
The native americans don't seem to like anything associated with them, even if it is positive.
Go Warriors!
rstein9 (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 6:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
are you kidding ? take your victim teepee and tent it over someone elses happiness ..the indian is
an american emblem of naturalism , i guess the bear will have to be stripped from the flag next ,the eagle , god forbid they should feel humiilated by being honored on a flag . so is that what indians live on now ? victimization ?
how drab ..teach your children to share , that would be a better lesson , old indian lady , kanu mama
harryhaller (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 9:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
HarryHaller, are you kidding me? "... the indian is an american emblem of naturalism"??? Native Americans are people, not animals or emblems. You don't sound like the sharpest tool in the shed. Read a good book, maybe that will help.
boysandgirls (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Talk about Communication Breakdown.Hey if I was a Native I would rather be an emblem of naturalism than the gross polluters we have become. Natives were one of the most harmonious societies to co-exist with the Earth in human history. We are still learning from them, and alot was lost that books did not record.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 10:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's not surprising that people have difficulty understanding how the mascot is ethnicaly offensive, it stems from their inability to empathize and lack of historical perspective. There is a long history of violent discrimination against Native Americans including strategic campaigns to kill and iradicate their existence. The warrior image, much like the terms savage and squaw, are tied to that oppression.
Native Americans as emblems of naturalism! Naturalism is a fallacy as everything in existence is inherently "natural." So that's just a ridiculous notion to begin with but I understand that you're trying to tie it to some kind of hippie, farmer's market, locally grown is teh best stuffz, idiocy. Ask the mammoths how "naturalistic" the North American natives were.
This comment thread is just a playground of stupid.
FightWoo (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 11:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I envision a different outcome for all of this (the opportunity for which has probably long since passed), in which the complaints are actually heard by those towards which they were directed. This is the communication breakdown. No one bothered to actually listen to what was being said by those offended by the representation. Instead, it was all taken as a personal insult and an affront to "tradition". Imagine if the complaints had been heard, and the response had been "what can we do about this", and the offended side saying "let's do this and this", and a back and forth ensues, and, miracle of miracles, a resolution to the issue is found, one that might, just might, even retain most of the positive aspects of the representation and hence uphold the intent of "tradition" and avoid the bulk of personal offense (you'll probably never please everybody). I don't know, one can imagine...
tegrat (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 11:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As Eli's relative, I am proud of this young man for standing up to bigotry. While the word "warrior" is not in itself offensive, the high school's depiction of a hook-nosed Indian stereotype was as offensive as any other racist image out there. That aside, it was the day-to-day treatment of Eli and other Native American students that really cast light on the environment at Carpinteria high school. Some of the more ignorant students (we can thank their parents for that) and some of the more ignorant school administrators perpetuated an environment of RACISM in a public high school. That is ILLEGAL. Eli Cordero was not only brave to make a stand, he was absolutely correct. Not politically correct, mind you. Simply right. Eli Cordero is a righteous young man and should be honored as such.
jcorderolamb (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 11:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So it was the depiction of the native? I guess I can see that, it would be like a picture of a mexican in a zarape and wide brimmed hat taking a siesta. Well those offended should be taken into consideration, and if their image is not what they want up representing them then so be it. There are plenty of positive warrior images that can be used without offending anyone.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 7:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
If those who bullied Eli Cordero would have had to face corporal punishment for their actions, I wonder if they would have done what they did?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 14, 2009 at 3:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
To the narrow minded of the coast:
You're life will grow to be as wide as your head, and so you will always see things from inside your ass. Keep it up, you make me laugh.
AZ2SB, wow. You should stick to watching TV. It's obviously done you good.
a_native_man (anonymous profile)
November 14, 2009 at 7:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well thank yah, thank yah very much. Elvis has left the building.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
November 14, 2009 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What's next? Do we need to change the "Dallas Cowboys" and the "Fighting Irish" ?
There are some pretty discriminating imagery of both these.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
November 14, 2009 at 11:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Loneranger: if the images of cowboys and Irishmen support the perpetuation of a currently hostile attitude towards cowboys and Irishmen in our country, then yes. I wouldn't worry too much about those two groups.
jcorderolamb (anonymous profile)
November 15, 2009 at 11:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I do not see hostile attitudes against Native Indians except for current issues of land use (casinos).
There is more hostile attitudes today against Hispanics than Indians and I do not see Imagery of Matadors going away as school mascots.
I find the only people that practice bigotry and hostility toward a race or class of people are those that have nothing else going for them beside their own race or religion -- which is really nothing at all.
loneranger (anonymous profile)
November 15, 2009 at 2:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The Office for Civil Rights' findings and corrective actions are a validation of what many in our community have been observing for some time: that the Carpinteria Unified School District has taken very little effective action until now in response to reported incidents of bullying, intolerance, cruelty, or intimidation for this or other issues. Many parents have not trusted the school district to handle such incidents appropriately.
It is unfortunate that there is not yet official legislation in California banning the imagery statewide; we must continue to lobby until such legislation is passed (as it has been already in other states) so that other communities will not have to experience the divisiveness and hostility that this issue has prompted.
It is also very ironic that the student was motivated to file the complaint following participation in the first annual District-sponsored Challenge Day program many in our community are not aware of this. The stated goals of this program that were outlined in a letter that went home to parents prior to continuing the program a second year included shifting ":dangerous peer pressure to positive peer support and to eliminate the acceptability of:all forms of oppression, racism, [and] harassment..." The intention was to have the "youth leave feeling bonded, empowered and committed to making a positive difference." It also noted that "at times, youth may need additional support."
Numerous staff members and students pledged to support the complainant both at and immediately following the first Challenge Day event in the Winter of 2008. When it came time to back him, however, staff support quickly vanished. He as well as other students have been the victims of ongoing peer harassment and hate speech for their stance on the issue.
When asked to meet with school staff to address parents' concerns last February, both administration and the main facilitator declined to do so.
There is more constructive action that the district could voluntarily undertake. For instance, it could still do its job to educate/ open up discussion on the topic rather than shut it down. Staff apparently were directed not to discuss the topic with their students out of concern for upsetting them. In addition, other districts have adopted district-wide positive behavioral support/ discipline systems. Finally, there was talk by administration of a Native American Studies course that has yet to materialize.
tortuga62 (anonymous profile)
November 15, 2009 at 5:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
El_Informador (anonymous profile)
November 15, 2009 at 7:22 p.m.