IN THE RED: The parent holding company of Santa Barbara Bank & Trust today announced a $40.7 million third-quarter loss. Teamed with previous losses in the year’s two earlier recession-rattled quarters, Pacific Capital Bancorp has lost more than $411 million in the first nine months of the year. The third-quarter report released Tuesday morning also said that while Pacific Capital was “well capitalized,” the bank’s core capital ratios “were not sufficient to meet the higher levels” that it had voluntarily agreed to with the federal government.
There’s also been a serious human cost this year, as 300 Pacific Capital employees, amounting to 22 percent of its workforce, were laid off in March. And as Pacific Capital’s stock plummeted from nearly $20 a year ago to $1.24 a share today, dividend payments were stopped. That proved to be an especially severe blow to some retiree stockholders as well as to former Bank & Trust officers who had remained loyal shareholders but saw their stock income cut to zero.
A bank spokeswoman did not return The Independent’s calls for comment.
Although unconfirmed rumors that the Pacific Capital was to be sold have swirled for months — including one this week that it had been split in two with Union Bank taking the southern branches and America West Bank taking the northern branches — nothing has been announced. Pacific Capital operates 46 branches under the Santa Barbara Bank & Trust name along with its four affiliated banks to the north: First National Bank of Central California, South Valley Bank, San Benito Bank, and First Bank of San Luis Obispo.
The company’s annual loss, which included a horrendous $362 million second quarter red-ink report, would have been worse except for Pacific Capital’s much-criticized RAL, a national program involving short-term, high-interest loans for those who want to borrow against their tax refunds rather than waiting for the government check. That program showed a $62 million profit, although a recent Vanity Fair article cited critics who called Bank & Trust’s RAL program in poor neighborhoods around the country “predatory.”
Pacific Capital received $180 million in TARP emergency stabilization money a year ago but has not yet paid dividends to the government. It has not said how much money it would take to raise its capital ratio to satisfy the government’s requirements.
In September, a class action suit was filed in L.A. federal court against Pacific Capital, claiming that its officers had issued false and misleading information about its ability to handle losses from loans. The bank denied the allegations.
So what are its options to increase capital? Here are some suggested by knowledgeable business people:
Sell stock. The board recently authorized increasing the amount to stock available from the present limit of 100 million shares to 500 million.
Restructure the balance sheet in part by reducing loans. Many of the big, bad loans are said to have been tract house projects in “soft” markets in the San Joaquin Valley and Reno areas. Its non-performing loans increased to $384.8 million in the third quarter from $348 million in the second quarter.
The bank has hired an investment banking firm to advise it on “strategic alternatives,” but in a conference call today, CEO George Leis said the bank will not comment until it “has something to report.”
Related Links
Barney Brantingham can be reached at barney@independent.com or (805) 965-5205. He writes online columns and a print column on Thursdays
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Barney
I am very disaapointed in the article on Santa Barbara Bank & Trust. In fact, I find that it is a little irresponsible. Yes, it has been a hard year for the bank. It has been a hard year for all Banks. Unfortunately, the negative and alarmist rumors have really done damage.
Responsible reporting would also talk about the fact that when we say well capitalized we are capitalize better then many of our peers. Also, In the 3rd quarter we saw a $1 million increase in pre-tax income reverses the prior quarters $4.6 million loss. The overall loss this quarter was less then this quarter last year. This indicates that aside from the stock price we are improving.
I would also like to point out that SBBT has been very involved in the community ( the second largest contributor to the United Way). Many of our officer serve on various Boards of Non-Profits.
We may have laid off just under 300 employees but we still employee close to 1000. The unfounded heresay about who is buying what and the potential for take over does nothing but upset and worry those who would most be effected. Until the Shareholders are voting there is no sale. We are exploring all possibilites but it ain't over till the shareholders sing.
Perhaps, next time you could practice unbiased reporting rather then repeating rumors. Who knows if people aren't scared out of their minds stock prices could go up.
Oh, did I mention the the increase in deposits over last quarter. Apparently, there are people that still believe in this 50 yr old institution that gave them their first car or home loan.
Sincerely
Urbanholly AKA Tired of Rumors
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 2
urbanholly (anonymous profile)
November 6, 2009 at 5:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
We are in very scary times. SBB&T has a long road ahead for itself.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
slowjoe (anonymous profile)
November 9, 2009 at 9:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
When a stock drops from a 52-week high of 17.47 to a low of (at this moment) 89 cents, don't blame the messengers, blame the managers.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
pk (anonymous profile)
November 9, 2009 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
PCBC has gotten a bit cocky and top heavy over the years. It is truly a shame if they do crash given the rich history on SBB&T in out area.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
slowjoe (anonymous profile)
November 9, 2009 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What would Ralph Raddue, do?
There are thieves, there are scoundrels, and then there are bankers. Ron, call your office!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Achilleus (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2009 at 7:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
That's Rod, not Ron.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Achilleus (anonymous profile)
November 10, 2009 at 8:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
.75 cents a share!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
slowjoe (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2009 at 8:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Closed today at 68 cents. If you wanted to take the risk, you could buy the whole company for a bag of peanuts and probably have a few kernels left over to toss to the elephants. Actually, the elephants would be a better buy--they leave less of a mess.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
pk (anonymous profile)
November 11, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SBB&T will survive one way or another. It's "BRAND" is to strong and well known in our area. I think it is interesting all the bashing going on when know one is pointing out all the good SBB&T has done in our area for almost 50 years.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
slowjoe (anonymous profile)
November 12, 2009 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The bottom line is the price of the stock and that's bad news. The significant fall in stock value has cost:
1) hundreds of jobs (300 layoffs were this year only - layoffs actually started in 2007-2008),
2) financial hardship to long-term stockholders, and
3) loss of retirement savings to existing employees who are well-vested in the company's Employee Stock Option Program.
The battle of the North vs the South continues as Mr Clay Larson continues to lord over the First National, South Valley and San Benito branches and George Leis pretends to be the CEO of Pacific Capital Bancorp.
How many local banks actually took the TARP money? SBBT was one of very few. Deposits may have increased but unless the bank is making profitable loans on the margins between deposit interest & loan interest, it isn't making money,
Being capitalized "better than our peers" is not sufficient if the bank is not capitalized per it's agreement with the Federal Reserve. And a lawsuit is a lawsuit until it is resolved.
I agree that it would be sad to see this institution meet its demise but I also know that it has not met it's value statements of shareholder satisfaction or employee satisfaction.
ps - how many employees or shareholders know that the bank operates a trust office in Treasure Island, FL????
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
anotherbanker (anonymous profile)
November 13, 2009 at 12:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
they have gone into markets they had no business to be in.....hey the stock is up to .80 cents!!!!!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
slowjoe (anonymous profile)
November 18, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment