• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Next News-Press Trial Begins

    National Labor Relations Board Opens Case Against Newspaper’s Management Tactics


    Tuesday, May 26, 2009
    By Barney Brantingham (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    THEY’RE BACK: There was a strong essence of déjà vu when the National Labor Relations Board opened its latest labor law prosecution of the Santa Barbara News-Press on Tuesday.

    Santa Barbara lawyer Barry Cappello was back representing owner Wendy McCaw, just as he did at the 2007 trial. Attorney Ira Gottlieb was there again for the Teamsters Union and newsroom employees, and Steven Wyllie was back as counsel for the NLRB.

    The only new face among headliners at the Santa Barbara College of Law courtroom was that of genial NLRB administrative law judge Clifford Anderson, not to be confused with the Santa Barbara Superior Court judge of the same name. In 2007, ALJ William G. Kocol ruled that eight newsroom union activists fired by McCaw after a legally protected demonstration should be rehired. That’s been on appeal by McCaw ever since and there’s been no word of when the full NLRB board in Washington is likely to hand down a decision. Meanwhile, the eight reporters haven’t been rehired.

    During opening arguments Tuesday, Wyllie accused the News-Press of bad faith during 18 months of fruitless negotiations trying to work out a new union contract; of interfering with NLRB investigations; and of hiring temporary employees to undercut the union, among other charges. Cappello strongly denied the accusations and countered with a claim that the union’s objective was to control the paper’s news content, contrary to the First Amendment. This, Cappello said, was “a central tenet of our case.”

    The NLRB and the newsroom employees have strenuously denied this intent. But Cappello on Tuesday cited federal Judge Stephen Wilson’s decision citing the First Amendment when Judge Wilson refused to order the reporters immediately rehired pending a decision on the NLRB appeal. Judge Wilson’s May 2008 ruling is under appeal before the federal Ninth Circuit appeals court.

    The current trial is expected to last about four weeks. Boxes of files are stacked up in the courtroom and a couple dozen witnesses are expected to testify. One person subpoenaed is former News-Press gossip columnist Richard Mineards, who was bounced from his $75,000-per-year job last January without notice to the union representing him. He now writes for the Montecito Journal, salary not known.

    Sure to be disputed is the firing of sportswriter Dennis Moran, who happened to be a regular member of the union contract negotiating committee. Union members found this to be retaliation for his activism. Wyllie said the reason given by management was that the shrunken sports department didn’t cover a golf tournament. Cappello on Tuesday countered with the charge that Moran gave false information to the public.

    Stay tuned for more to come.

    Barney Brantingham can be reached at barney@independent.com or (805) 965-5205. He writes online columns and a print column on Thursdays.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    LIKELY none of the former N-P staffers nor editor(s) shall be rehired, but a sizable out-of-court settlement would be highly recommended. How much longer can Ms. McCaw continue to stiff her former readership - or the fragment of it still left? Even from a safe distance, no one has made herself more visibly persona non grata than 'her Mc-ladyship' [arguably] from out of town! How many ways can an otherwise patient local populace explain the precise meaning of "deportation" to a huffy local business owner, who still doesn't get it? NO OTHER PERSON, IN LOCAL SOCIETY CIRCLES has done more to give Santa Barbara a bad name - undeservedly,

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    gogosian2001 (anonymous profile)
    May 27, 2009 at 3:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    (This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of use policy.)

    Trying2 (anonymous profile)
    May 27, 2009 at 7:10 a.m.

    75K to cover gossip? is that job still open?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    flamnikita (anonymous profile)
    May 27, 2009 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Let it go...NP operations are wackadoodle and will continue to be so until Wendy is bored and moves on ( hopefully ). Nothing is going to change, no one wins here.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    lordleadbetter (anonymous profile)
    May 27, 2009 at 9 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    See that's the thing flam, they fired, in essence, all of their top paid employees (some just shy of retirement I understand) and hired cheaper, less experienced labor. They also hired many "temps" to avoid paying benefits AND so that the Union wouldn't swell. Ya'll can correct me if I'm wrong, thats just how I've put the pieces together. So to answer your question, no, there isn't a 75k job opening, LOL.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    crissyslucky7 (anonymous profile)
    May 27, 2009 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    61.0°
    Wind:
    6 SSE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Sexile
    6. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.