From a vantage point about a mile and a half up Highway 154, at a point with a view directly into Maria Ignacio Canyon and toward the Windy Gap fuel break, Independent reporter Ray Ford filed the following story. He called it in on his cell phone at 11:45 a.m. on Saturday, May 9.
The fire did cross Highway 154 a little bit, above where the turnout is—the one with a number of rock outcroppings where climbers go bouldering. The fire crossed into the east fork of Maria Ignacio Creek. However, it is still at least a mile from the Trout Club, and there is no fire moving in that direction at all.
There is still one fork of Maria Ignacio, one canyon, that the fire would have to cross before getting to Old San Marcos Pass, so it’s still a long way away; and the marine influence is coming in and starting to push the fire lightly uphill away from the Trout Club.
On the other hand, it is on the east slope of Maria Ignacio, moving very quietly uphill, just across from the Painted Cave area. It is still quite a way from the Painted Cave area, but Painted Cave nonetheless has more cause for concern—should the fire turn back to the west—than the Trout Club.
Right now, because of the marine influence, the weather has gone from warm, further down, to slightly cool. I am almost at the top of the marine layer, just below the rock art site. In fact, I just got a nice cool blast of air. And what that’s doing is carrying the smoke and the little spot fires up a canyon toward the Windy Gap fire break. There’s still concern for Painted Cave, but the fire is starting to move away.
There are probably 20 hand crews down below starting to cut off those spot fires, so there’s lots of activity over here. In addition, the larger bombers, the four-engine planes, are just beginning to drop retardant on the ridge between the Painted Cave area and the spot fires.
So, you’ve got four good things happening: The marine influence coming in; the cool wind causing fire to move east and away from Painted Cave; the huge number of hand crews cutting line; and larger bombers laying down retardant.
As for the DC-10, I don’t think it could drop here because the bombers are diving right down into the canyon, parallel to the ridge lines, at 30-degree angles.
Ford will continue to report on the Jesusita Fire throughout the day. He plans to move along East Camino Cielo to the fire's eastern end as well.
Related Links
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Ray: What are the chances that the fire on the Goleta front can jump over Camino Cielo, and what is currently in place to prevent that?
GoletaResident (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It appears that this 'tongue' of the Jesusita fire that stretched west towards the Gap fire fuel break created a missing link for future fire protection for us in Goleta.
Hey ~ just looking at things from the bright side.
GoletaResident (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have no idea how Ray finds the resources, access, and energy to file these reports but I am very grateful for them. I will never forget an adventure I went on that was led by Ray about 15 years ago. He's now leading thousands of us on a serious and important adventure as stands near the fiery mouth of the big, scary dragon. Thanks Ray and thank you Indy!
Don Lubach
DonLubach (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
First thing: Thank you to all supporting the community in this emergency. Secondly, as a native Californian I'm grateful for any defenses used against fire threats to California communities (whatever the financial cost)...but there's always various "costs"Â to consider...I was wondering if there's a limit to how much fire retardant can be dropped in Jesusita's proximity to the creeks & ocean? I read that it can be toxic to fish...in what amounts and how long until it wears off?source: http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/Projects.aspx?P...
payattention (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 1:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Fire, fire rising higher...
Reaching for the mountain crest.
Ever, ever flames are climbing...
Until no more brush is left.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(written by GoletaResident, today)
GoletaResident (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 2:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There is some toxic affect from Silv-Ex and Phos Chek G75-F, but I tend to think it is essential in this case for us to get the fire out, and as fast as possible. Such massive firestorms can denude the entire watershed and fill what streams there are with mud and totaly destroy aquatic habitat far more.
CGerlach (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 2:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Many thanks, Ray, for your fine reporting on this fire. Your extensive knowledge of, and love for, the back country of Santa Barbara has given those of us who are far away the kind of details and accurate information sadly lacking in much of the other fire coverage. As someone who grew up in SB and hiked extensively throughout the areas burned, I appreciate your stellar coverage and fine photos even as I agonize for the people and critters fleeing the flames. My heart is with you, Santa Barbara, and mahalo to Ray and the Indie for keeping us so well informed.
Arbolado (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 2:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Once again a heartfelt thanks to the wonderful Indy for the coverage. The County should step up next time we have a fire event (which hopefully won't happen), instead of depending on our media sources to get out the info. The County kiosks were pathetic, as was their Web site.
Ray, and all the Indy reporters, you are priceless to the community! Thanks to the hard work of our firefighters!!
Lets hope that Painted Cave and the homes on the Pass are safe. Take good care, everyone!!
CAVELA (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Re the first comment asking about the fire burning over the top of the Santa Ynez mountains: The chances are very low because 1) there is a fair firebreak up their to backfire from, 2) there are lots of brush engine and hand crews on hand to jump on most spot fires that might start, 3) there's little other fire in socal so we have good air support to knock down a slop-over , 4) fire weather is forecast to be pretty good the next few days, 5) any slop-over would be burning down hill in vegetation with higher moisture content and lower solar heating because of the northern exposure. But never count mother nature out when she's only down.
sbhobo (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 8:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Talking about the bright side......While no wild fire is a good one to those who lose homes, cars, animals, or otherwise suffer, looking at this fire from a community perspective, it is a good fire. { I wouldn't say that if the state/county/city/voters would support and implement proscribed burning after the rains when intentionally set fires will burn controllably. } While last year's Gap fire (no homes lost) shows old fuels can have slow enough fires we can suppress without lost of property, the most likely outcome for the fuel between the Gap and Tea fires (which hasn't burned since 1990 or 1964), is something like last year's Tea Fire (200 homes lost in the first 4 hours), the 1990 Paint fire (600 homes lost in the first 3 hours), or the circa 1977 Sycamore fire (350? homes in 4 hours). This is because: a) Santa Barbara and Noleta have many more homes in the foothills than Goleta, b) many of Goleta's most vulnerable homes are protected by large orchards or range lands. Furthermore: c) historically most of the burned acreage occurs during the large fires, and d) statistically the large fires are so because they started and spread during worse fire weather than the Gap or Jesusita Fires had (much worse sundowner winds -- hotter, faster, lasting longer, and directed more into the city), and e) with lower fuel moisture than the Jesusita Fire. Last point -- The Jesusita fire didn't have to compete with any other major fires so we received all the crews we could use. In summary, the odds are great that if this fire wasn't happening now, some or all of this acreage would of fed one or more fires that would of raged into the city and suburbs, burning more than a 1000 homes. That's no consolation to those who experienced loss now (My sincere condolences.), but it is to the rest of us who now have much lower risk for the next ten years.
sbhobo (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 10:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment