• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Strickland Votes Against Cigarette Tax Bill

    Opponents Note Money He’s Received from Tobacco Companies


    Friday, June 26, 2009
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    State Senator Tony Strickland has voted against a bill that would increase the state tax imposed on the sale of cigarettes as well as measures that would increase penalties on vendors who sold tobacco products to minors. Strickland, an ardent anti-tax Republican, rejected the tobacco tax — which would generate $1.2 billion a year — in keeping with his conservative anti-tax philosophy. In addition, the two measures making it tougher to sell tobacco to minors were blasted by the California Chamber of Commerce as job killers.

    Strickland’s critics noted that the state senator has received $91,000 during the course of his political career from cigarette companies.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Strickland, and others, strict adherence to a philosophy driven by a thinly veiled disdain for their fellow human beings will eventually kill the state of California unless we act quickly to repeal the supermajority rule. Even on issues which make economic sense, such as supporting single-payer healthcare financing which would reduce and control healthcare costs for the state, political neanderthals like Strickland simply cannot see past their group mentality. But certainly he'll claim that all that tobacco money isn't clouding his thinking.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    tegrat (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 1:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    How did California get into this huge debt?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 2:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    No, No , NO,

    The best way to pay for healthcare is to impose a 10 cent per Tampon Tax!

    Just think about it for realsies. Who's the biggest user of healthcare? Fertile or pregnant women. You know it's true. Prenatal care, multiple trips to the Docs office, C-sections at 10K a piece, post pregnancy complications, neo natal units, post partum depression treatments..Tax Credits for Breast Feeding???

    Why should my healthcare payment rise 33% to pay for all that? Not to mention all the low income types who get the State to pay for all of it...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    sa1 (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 2:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Cig taxes are blood money.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    spyfly2 (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 4:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Discrimination. Why not tax health food? People who smoke know it's unhealthy. Why punish them more?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    East_Fork (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I have to takes on this: At one end, if one is taking money from certain organizations, obviously they will likely be beholden to that contributor. (To wit, when Bob Dole managed to say--with a straight face--that he wasn't sure if cigarettes were addictive while taking money from tobacco industries)

    The second point is that this taxing of cigarettes is a form of de facto prohibition. In the end, if you make them so expensive as to be unaffordable, they become Black Market items just as booze did under prohibition with all the attendant Black Market crime.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    June 27, 2009 at 3:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "I have *two* takes on this"

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    June 28, 2009 at 2:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    The biggest user of healthcare is most certainly NOT fertile or pregnant women. It is old, sick people. By sa1's logic, we ought to put a surtax on Depends.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    SezMe (anonymous profile)
    June 29, 2009 at 12:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Broken Clouds
    Temperature:
    55.0°
    Wind:
    5 ENE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Sexile
    6. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.