• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    The Winners (and Losers) Are…

    Statewide Scorecard for Governor’s Race, Senate Snafus, Budget Woes, and the Mad Media


    Thursday, June 25, 2009
    By Jerry Roberts (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Here’s a look at the best and worst performances of the week in California politics.

    Gubernatorial Groupies

    California attorney general Jerry Brown
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    California attorney general Jerry Brown

    Winner: Jerry Brown. L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s announcement that he will not enter the 2010 governor’s race gives a boost to erstwhile Boy King Brown, seeking to become the first person to be both the youngest and oldest person elected California’s chief executive. One of the first politicians to recognize the coming political power of Latinos, the attorney general is well-positioned to capture the bulk of Villaraigosa’s cultural and geographic political base.

    San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom

    Loser: Gavin Newsom. Strategists for the 41-year-old San Francisco mayor insist that Villaraigosa’s withdrawal gives them exactly what they wanted all along: a two-man race focused on generational change against the 71-year-old Brown. But a new L.A. Times poll shows Newsom sucking wind big-time in L.A. Worse news came in the form of a sordid sex scandal, involving Nevada Republican Senator John Ensign, which carries echoes of Newsom’s own messy affair with the wife of his closest adviser a few years ago.

    Senatorial Dis-Courtesies

    Winner: None.

    Loser: Dianne Feinstein. DiFi, who portrays herself as a policy wonk standing above the messy money-grubbing of politics, stepped into a big puddle of political embarrassment when aides sent out invitations to lobbyists for a fundraising lunch that all but put a price tag on her committee assignments. The invite said the menu would include: “The Select Committee on Intelligence for the first course, followed by your choice of Appropriations, Judiciary or Rules committees,” a case study of the kind of soft-core influence peddling that’s a daily occurrence in Washington. Feinstein cancelled the lunch after it got publicized, to “avoid misunderstanding.” Right.

    Loser: Barbara Boxer. Boxer made herself instant fodder for TV comics when she went all diva at a committee hearing, demanding a military officer who was testifying address here as “Senator” instead of “Ma’am.” Republicans seized on her self-important display as evidence of liberal contempt for the armed forces, while those who knew her when she was just another supe schlepping zoning decisions in San Rafael could only shake their heads at how she long ago forgot where she came from.

    Budget Follies

    Winner: The California Commission on the 21st Century Economy. With Sacramento bogged down in yet another tiresome round of partisan finger-pointing over the state’s budget deficit, a tax reform commission appointed by Gov. Arnold and Speaker Karen Bass has moved quietly and efficiently towards sweeping recommendations to revise California’s Industrial Age tax code. Given their assignment, the commission’s final report will no doubt have something for everyone to hate; it also will have pose real solutions to the problem of boom-or-bust tax collections that swing wildly along with the business cycle.

    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    Loser: Barack Obama. At a time when the U.S. government is generating debt at the speed of light, the president and his posse condescendingly dismissed California’s plea for loan guarantees to get the state through a looming cash crunch. The guarantees wouldn’t cost the Treasury a dime and, as Joe Matthews noted at foxandhoundsdaily.com, California taxpayers now effectively subsidize the feds, with only 80 cents in federal funds returned to the state for every dollar sent to Washington.

    Media Mavens

    Winner: Timm Herdt. As the governor and Legislature slash billions from schools and the most vulnerable people in California, the Ventura County Star’s man in Sacramento churned out a well-reported piece detailing $2 billion worth of corporate tax cuts that got slipped into the budget behind closed doors. Day in and day out, the veteran Herdt is one of the toughest reporters in the Capitol, and his “95% Accurate” (blog) is a must-read for keeping track of what Central Coast lawmakers are up to in the River City.

    Loser: CNN. A revolution is unfolding in Iran, unemployment’s soaring, and the epic battle over health care is joined in Washington, but Wolf Blitzer’s heavy breathing big exclu this week is…the mayor of L.A. is not running for governor of California. State political junkies, all 112 of us, were glued to the sets for Wolf’s sloppy wet kiss interview with Tony V., but the rest of the nation, probably not so much. And “the most trusted name in news” wonders why it’s losing the battle on cable.

    Capitol Letters thanks all our contestants for playing.

    Related Links

    • More Capitol Letters columns

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Timm (cq) Herdt ?
    cq?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    June 27, 2009 at 7:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    "cq" is newspaperese for "sic," used as note to editors to confirm spelling or usage which is unusual, here referring to double m in Herdt's first name. .

    jerryroberts (Jerry Roberts)
    June 27, 2009 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    probably short for "cheque"

    Now here's one that has always confused me (ei) or (ie) ?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    sa1 (anonymous profile)
    June 27, 2009 at 8 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    woops. the cq slipped thru this time, but i don't think it made it to print though. it actually means the opposite of "check" or "cheque," as in:

    "Hey editors,
    I know this spelling is correct, so don't mess it up.
    Thanks,
    writer

    P.S. Don't print the cq either!"

    And it's i before e except after c, except for some other instances.

    Matt (Matt Kettmann)
    June 27, 2009 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    According to an article in the LA Times, "educators" are now recommending the i b4 e rule be eliminated from English instruction. Too many exceptions. Funny, but in over 60 years I haven't noticed many at all.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
    June 27, 2009 at 11:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Tsk tsk, buy ya books, send you to school and this is what we get...

    I before E except after C except when it sounds like A as in neighbor and weigh.

    I got music and shop class too and didn't have to pay for extracurricular sports...Real shame what's happening to our school system

    Lest I be too judgemental, I misstated my occasional confusion of using exempli gratia (e.g.) or id est (i.e.)

    Rather then test you('r patience) I'll simple share freely:

    When you mean “for example,” use e.g. It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase exempli gratia. When you mean “that is,” use “i.e.” It is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase id est. Either can be used to clarify a preceding statement, the first by example, the second by restating the idea more clearly or expanding upon it. Because these uses are so similar, the two abbreviations are easily confused. If you just stick with good old English “for example” and “that is” you won’t give anyone a chance to sneer at you. If you insist on using the abbreviation, perhaps “example given” will remind you to use “e.g.,” while “in effect” suggests “I.E.”

    Since e.g. indicates a partial list, it is redundant to add “etc.” at the end of a list introduced by this abbreviation.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    sa1 (anonymous profile)
    June 27, 2009 at 12:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    72.0°
    Wind:
    6 WSW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. Teacher in Trouble
    4. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    5. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    6. My Swine Flu Experience
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.