• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Sierra Club Chapter’s Election Invalidated, Again

    More Significant Voting Irregularities Cited in the Recount Election


    Thursday, June 25, 2009
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    The Sierra Club’s national headquarters announced on Wednesday it would not be considering the ballots cast in the ongoing recount election for the Los Padres Chapter of the Sierra Club, citing significant voting irregularities that could change the outcome of the election.

    “The ballots will not be counted because there is no purpose in declaring winners and losers in an invalid election,” wrote Greg Casini of the national Sierra Club. The deadline for submitting mail-in ballots was June 25 for the recount election, which was initiated after the national Sierra Club invalidated the results of last December’s race for the Los Padres board in which more than 40 percent of the ballots cast were deemed questionable.

    In addition, Casini stated in an email communication that he was recommending to the national board of directors that the Los Padres chapter be suspended for four years. The national board has yet to act on that recommendation.

    According to Casini, enough questionable new ballots had been received for the recount election “to materially impact the outcome of the election and that the integrity of this election has already been severely compromised.” The bulk of those, said Casini, are related to the Sespe Group of the Los Padres Chapter. Likewise, in the December election, candidates supported by activists from the Sespe Group benefited by the questionable ballots cast. Sespe activists have been focused on efforts to protect Ormond Beach and, for the past four years, the Sierra Club has paid an outspoken Sespe leader, Al Sanders, $30,000 a year to agitate and organize on behalf of Ormond Beach restoration efforts. In recent months, Sanders’ pay has become an issue of considerable controversy; twice in the past seven months, the Los Padres board has taken action to discontinue Sanders’ pay.

    Among the latest voting irregularities, Casini said he was troubled by the fact that 53 new joint voting memberships had been purchased since January by members of the Sespe Group. A joint membership — typically for a husband and wife — counts for two votes, not just one. Casini noted that no group memberships had been purchased by anyone in the Sespe Group in the prior seven months, and only three had been purchased elsewhere throughout the Los Padres Chapter. One address alone had six joint memberships, meaning it possessed 12 ballots. Sixteen addresses have multiple memberships for a total of 89 votes. Of those, all but one had been secured by someone in the Sespe Group.

    With the recount invalidated, Casini said current members of the Los Padres Executive Committee could remain. (For more background on this dispute, see the June 18 Angry Poodle Barbecue, headlined “Bark Not, Want Not.”)

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    This is getting too stupid. Were the multiples, perchance, at Rincon Point addresses?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    GregMohr (anonymous profile)
    June 26, 2009 at 4:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    70.0°
    Wind:
    9 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    4. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    5. My Swine Flu Experience
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.