I’m sure you get this a lot, but I was so excited to elect you last November. Ever since your speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, I’ve been talking about how I couldn’t wait to cast my vote for you. On November 4, I felt so honored to be part of your historical journey to the White House.
That day, I also voted against Proposition 8, the ballot initiative that stripped millions of Californians of their right to marry simply because they’re gay. And even though the initiative narrowly passed, I’ve been trying to focus on the positives. I was doing rather well until your announcement that Rick Warren would be delivering the invocation at your inauguration on January 20.
Gay Girl / Straight World
I know, I know—you’re trying to end the era of divisive politics in Washington. You’re trying to show that everyone has a place at the table in your administration. I get that, and, frankly, I applaud your apparent dedication to that theme of change. I certainly wish a lot of people who were ignored when trying to be heard during Dubya’s eight years were given the same opportunity. I like that you seem to abide by the Golden Rule of doing unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Interestingly enough, I learned about this scripture and many others as a member of Pastor Warren’s evangelical congregation at Saddleback Church in south Orange County. For a long time I really liked Saddleback—it wasn’t very “churchy,” what with our pastor in Hawaiian shirts and services done in giant tents with lots of contemporary sounding music. But, like many Americans, my world changed after 9/11, and when I came home from college in Santa Barbara one weekend to see a giant American flag on the side of the church, I knew I couldn’t continue to worship there. After all, God is not American, and I certainly don’t think God condones the atrocities George Bush has committed in God’s name.
President-elect Obama, I think we can agree that Warren’s collusion of religion and politics in that tumultuous time was unwise. Similarly, I would argue that his heavy involvement in Proposition 8 was more divisive than anything else. He was one of the first people to argue—erroneously—that if Prop. 8 failed, pastors could be charged with hate speech if they spoke against homosexuality. Most thinking people didn’t fall for that assertion (largely because most thinking people realized that Prop. 8 was about a civil, not religious, issue), but a good number did. Not only did Warren adamantly and vocally support Prop. 8, he told Steven Waldman, editor of beliefnet.com, in an interview that allowing gay marriages is similar to condoning incest, pedophilia, and polygamy.
As a gay woman who is none of the things Warren contends I am, and as someone who had the right to marry on November 3 but not on November 5, I’ve got to say, Barack, I’m a little upset with your invocation choice. Of course you’re not saying Warren is your spiritual adviser (and history has shown that the person giving the invocation doesn’t play a major role in a president’s choices), but couldn’t you have picked someone who is a bit more middle-of-the-road? Warren may be moderate on the evangelical scale, but that’s not saying a whole lot, since many right-wing Christians think global warming isn’t real and dinosaurs never roamed the Earth. I’m willing to bet that if Warren had advocated repealing a right from women or Jews or any other minority, he wouldn’t have been asked to speak at your inauguration. Maybe that helps to explain why your selection of Pastor Warren feels like such a slap in the face, especially to someone whose first piece of Obama flair was a rainbow-stripped button with your silhouette that I purchased at L.A. Pride last year.
You can’t please all the people all the time; perhaps this is just a small setback in an administration that will consistently fight for minorities’ rights. You are, after all, more of a friend than a foe to the gay community. I will continue to hope, as you have inspired us to do, for an America where all citizens are treated equally. Please don’t break our hearts.
Related Links
Penny Patterson writes an online column about gay life in Santa Barbara called Gay Girl/Straight World. See independent.com/gaygirl for more.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
With a little help for my friend.
The fear of
the darkness
again disappears
when my
memory lives,
saving the pleasure
of a natural life;
and a thanks
overcomes, like
a delicate bird
near a shining
fountain.
Francesco Sinibaldi
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1
Sinibaldi (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2009 at 12:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
alexquinn (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2009 at 5:33 p.m.
Oh, and nice job, Penny, writing about an interesting dilemma--thrilled about Obama, but deeply disappointed about Warren. I know the feeling.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
alexquinn (anonymous profile)
January 17, 2009 at 5:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Gay mafia ? I guess you don't know know all Americans are allowed to voice their opinion. Dictating is what happens when people do not speak out.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
cubathecat (anonymous profile)
January 18, 2009 at 6:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Actually, AShaw, I did listen to and read his ideas. Contrary to what you want people to think, he has them, and they are quite clear. I know it may be comforting to you to think he got elected by a bunch of dummies, but the truth is scarier--there are a lot of smart, thoughtful people out in America who want a lot of things that are very different from the things you want.
You can try to deride change as something empty and meaningless, but the truth is far more threatening to you I'm sure--and helps to inspire all the vitriol you spew on here: the truth is that there are some clear changes that are needed and that are coming.
And of course it's not the first or last time Obama will disappoint me. I don't expect perfection. But I do know that his views and policies more accurately reflect my own than do any of the things done in the last 8 years of VERY BAD MANAGEMENT. Change is here and it's about time. Sorry 'bout your bad luck.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
alexquinn (anonymous profile)
January 19, 2009 at 4:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Barack is the anti-Bush, and to many who voted for him, that's all that matters.
What people need to realize is that the enemy of your enemy is not always your friend.
What his supporters don't like to talk about is the fact that he sat in the pew of Jerimiah Wright's church for twenty years and had no problem with what Wright was saying about America until the press got wind of it. Let me also remind the readers (knowing I'm sounding like a broken record) that Obama voted for reauthorization of the Patriot Act in 2006, and I just heard on the news last night that he plans to step up the attack in Afghanistan (peace lovers take note) which is part of his sixteen-month war plan.
Whether or not you are for the war or the Patriot Act, the fact is Obama was touted as being for "hope and change" and he has never made a secret about his plans but his supporters chose to sweep this under the rug.
Good luck folks, and turn off the light when you leave.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 22, 2009 at 2:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Yes and never has race been more of an issue than it is now. Rev Lowry at the inaugural calling for 'White to do right' " -AShaw-
AShaw: Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the Bible, isn't only God called "Reverend"? If that's the case, why do all these "Reverends" call such attention to themselves? (And for the naysayers who want to attack Christianity, I bring this point up because these people who call themselves "Reverend" are claiming to believe in the God of the Bible)
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2009 at 4:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Here is the Lowery's speech, from a link to the venerable Chicago Times.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/01/...
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2009 at 6:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I don't know what he means by Brown sticking around, but it is clear that his call for yellow (Asians) to be mellow, and Whites to do right is clearly racist P.C. hypocrisy that passes itself off as part of the new progressive world order.
As a "Christian" pastor, he should call on *all* to repent, not just White folks, but the bottom line of the message is Black good; White bad; and he hides behind the cloth to spew this.
Here is the uncomfortable truth: In addition to what we already know about slavery/lynching/W.A.S.P.-inflicted discrimination, there has always been a counter-movement against this, and it was already in place with the then-unconventional actions of John Adams, Ben Franklin and others who had very strong convictions of social justice. Despite this, there are those who prefer to sweep that under the rug and only talk about all the horrible things the White race. not white *individuals" did. "Reverend" Lowery is a bigot because he sees us not as individuals, but as people who are marked by the immutable quality of our racial origin, which is an accident of birth and not a choice we make.
Martin Luther King gave his life for his dream where his children would not be "judged by the color of their skin, but for the content of their character", but the Freedom Train has been hijacked by those such as Lowery who talk out one side of their mouth about justice, but keep telling us that if we should feel guilty simply because of our skin color.
And as AShaw pointed out, didn't the White race already do right by electing Obama?
Don't kid yourself folks, the professional race-baiters such as Lowery and others such as him will be no sooner placated by the endless concessionary gestures of self-loathing Whites as the KKK will be impressed by people of color who live their lives in a dignified manner. While through the sheer force of numbers and economic advangage White bigots have done far more damage than bigots of color, the bigots of color are just as hateful, and given the same opportunities, would inflect the same damage.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2009 at 6:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Afghanistan is the graveyard of superpowers and Obama is about to start a quagmire there paralleling Vietnam. Were you listening?" -AShaw-
No, they weren't listening and they don't want to listen. The way it works is this: If Bush uses our military to go overseas and kill people, he's a warmonger; when Clinton did it and Obama is planning on it these people remain silent.
Such is the American electorate.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 24, 2009 at 9:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think Bush Jr.'s conflict in Iraq is a questionable decision.
I don't think anyone has considered his involvement in Afganistan as being better or worse than any other president's. Quite the opposite, since that was where Bin Laden was supposed to be hunted down and taken.
However, I agree w/ AShaw's comment about Afghanistan being a "graveyard of super powers" as somewhat true. They were able to withstand the Russians well enough, that they were probably a large factor in the breakup of the USSR. The irony is, that the US (we) armed and trained the Afghanis!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
January 29, 2009 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment