I’ve been stopping off at Smart & Final quite a bit in the past few days. I’m not opening a restaurant, so vats of cooking oil may appear to be an odd purchase. And I’m not planning a water drinking party, so filling my cart with flats of bottled water and multiple packages of toilet paper and paper towels may seem a bit bizarre.
In reality, my multiple rounds of in-bulk buys are because of one man: Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Gay Girl / Straight World
You see, a little over a month ago, everyone’s favorite Terminator utilized his line-item veto power to slash $52 million from state AIDS funding just one week after the California Legislature made its own $30 million in cuts. In seven days, a total of $82 million was eliminated from core HIV services.
Although times are lean and companies across the country are making difficult decisions to lay off employees, cut hours, and eliminate services, the governor’s actions hurt some of the most vulnerable people in our state—the homeless, the mentally ill, field workers, monolingual Spanish-speakers, and economically disadvantaged families and children.
When I spoke with a distraught and reeling David Selberg, Pacific Pride Foundation’s (PPF) executive director, a few days after Schwarzenegger’s veto, he expressed concerns about the individuals his organization assists on a regular basis. But he was also vague, saying he was not aware of the extent to which his staff, offices, and services would be impacted. PPF may be known simply as the county’s gay and lesbian resource center and HIV/AIDS services center, but it’s also the largest provider of such services between L.A. and San Francisco, meaning Selberg has since been working tirelessly to secure some modicum of funding from a variety of sources.
The intervening month has seen a sharp change in tone; anger and frustration have replaced shock, and Selberg is no longer vague but very blunt and specific about what his nonprofit needs. At a town hall meeting last Wednesday, Selberg reported that the combined cuts made for a loss of more than $600,000 to PPF’s HIV/AIDS services, 65 percent of its budget for that work. And, although the cuts came at the end of July, they were effective the first of that month, meaning PPF immediately had to lay off 11 employees in order to not go bankrupt. In addition, the budget for the food pantry was reduced by half, and PPF’s offices need to be downsized drastically.
Feeling enraged, helpless? Yeah, me too. Fortunately, there are some very simple ways everyone can help. The first of these is to go to PPF’s Web site (pacificpridefoundation.org) and sign up to connect your Ralphs or Vons grocery-store club card to the nonprofit. Every time you use your club card, the stores donate a portion of your total bill to PPF; since it’s free to sign up for the club cards, this method of getting PPF more funding won’t cost you a dime. Next, the food pantry’s supplies are running out—fast. There’s a shopping list of needed goods at PPF’s Santa Barbara offices (126 E. Haley St.) and on its site, so next time you are at the store, pick up something that’s on the list and donate it to the pantry. (Hence my bulk purchases at Smart & Final.)
The county’s Board of Supervisors, although facing its own budget shortfalls, needs to know we will not stand idly by in such a crisis situation, so tell the board that portions of the General Fund should continue to be used for HIV services. A standardized letter in support of this is available at PPF’s office and Web site.
Last, but certainly not least, is the AIDS Walk on October 3. This needs to be a hugely successful event, which means everyone must be diligent in his or her fundraising efforts. As an added incentive, Santa Barbaran Kevin Harder, a longtime supporter of PPF, has generously offered to match $100,000 of contributions made by October 3. And, at the town hall meeting, Cox Communications’ David Edelman promised $5,000 from his company if PPF can match that amount by the end of October with new donor contributions.
It’s time to do your part by pledging to donate your time and money to help PPF.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
You can't have it all. Communities will have to decide if this important enough or other more vital services. It's tough times and belts are being tighthened. It has nothing to do with a person.. it's just the situation we are currrently in.
I hope that those that can contribute personally can.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
BeachLivin (anonymous profile)
September 1, 2009 at 3:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Beach, it's simple econ 101: If the $$$ ain't there, it just ain't there. There's MANY programs that benefit "WHS" (White Hetero Sexual) folks that are on the chopping block as well. It is tough times, what'll help is creativity, generosity & kindness, finding or creating niches :) henry
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
hank (anonymous profile)
September 14, 2009 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Pronunciation: \ˈprīd\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English prȳde, from prūd proud — more at proud
Date: before 12th century
1 : the quality or state of being proud: as a : inordinate self-esteem : conceit b : a reasonable or justifiable self-respect c : delight or elation arising from some act, possession, or relationship <parental pride>
2 : proud or disdainful behavior or treatment : disdain
3 a : ostentatious display b : highest pitch : prime
4 : a source of pride : the best in a group or class
5 : a company of lions
6 : a showy or impressive group <a pride of dancers>
(http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionar...)
OK, I know that I am *way* late on posting this, but I must.
In addition to what Hank says, I will point out how hypocritical Pacific Pride by wanting it both ways.
Of the many diseases that kill us, AIDS is an especially bad way to die. Another bad way to go is lung cancer, and in many cases, both are behavior-related.
When people die of lung cancer and it is found that they were smokers, there are no parades, no Hollywood celebrities wearing ribbons to "raise awareness" about the disease, but rather a collective thought of "too bad, he/she was a nice person, but they brought it upon themselves". For some reason however, when the deceased dies of AIDS, there are memorials and tributes even if the person's demise was related to their sexually promiscuous lifestyle. Why the double standard?
Let's connect the dots: Selberg and Edelman, who represent Pacific Pride, along with "reverend" Mark Asman, (Doesn't the Bible--which is the user's manual to which Asman refers, only refer to God as "reverend" and doesn't it also speak of the dangers of pride?) are complaining that there isn't enough money to help those suffering with AIDS, yet on Pacific Pride's web site there are several links as you scroll down the page and one of them is to "gay wired". The gay wired link is one of very sexually graphic images of men, and nestled among the pictures is the suggestion "I think with both heads", yet somehow neither Patterson, Selberg, Asman, Edelman, nor anybody else associated with this organization make the connection. In short, having such a link is like having an organization that is trying to prevent smoking-related diseases while at the same time having links advertising cigarettes.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2009 at 8:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
(part 2 of 2)
Then there is the issue of "Pride". The argument rages "Are gay people born that way, or do they choose to be that way?". Taking this to the next step: Is the promiscuity that Pacific Pride promotes on its web site something that is learned by being told that it is ones right to be that way, or is it an inherent part of being gay? If it is inherent, what is Pacific Pride proud of, and if it is learned, why is Pacific Pride encouraging behavior which results in people acquiring a lethal, incurable disease?
We hear about "AIDS education" but when we take the left-wing politically correct approach of telling people that they are victims of society rather than telling them that they must account for their behavior, we are doing them no favors.
If Pacific Pride is so concerned about people dying of AIDS--not to mention the financial toll the illness takes, they would stop flaunting the lifestyle that is largely responsible for the spread of this disease in the first place.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
September 29, 2009 at 8:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment